Now, answer the question. Do you believe pitchforking a pad into the net should count as a goal, because factually, and within the rules it isn’t. What was there that changed the cut and dry rule?
You’re completely out to lunch here, man.He played the puck. Watch the replay, the puck was visible hence the whistle wasn’t blown. 100% a good goal
Something from Fugazi is way more crowd-friendly IMOSweet Caroline needs to die.
Do you happen to be legally blind?He played the puck. Watch the replay, the puck was visible hence the whistle wasn’t blown. 100% a good goal
LolThe 1st one: 100% goal
The 2nd one: whistle wasn’t blown, the replay I saw the puck was visible and the US forward played the puck.
Agree to disagree. I paused the replay.. puck was thereYou’re completely out to lunch here, man.
Good for him then they were both illegal goals then.You’re kidding yourself if Canada had those goals called back you’d be in your moms basement shedding tears and wiping your wet snots on your autographed John Tavares jersey
Sure. No one is denying where the puck was, you legitimately cannot push a pad into the net. It’s cut and dry.Agree to disagree. I paused the replay.. puck was there