Fraser28
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2013
- 2,401
- 2,513
goalie didnt have control of the puck, wasnt pushed into the goal, how is it not a goal?
Uhh what? That is a blatant lie.
goalie didnt have control of the puck, wasnt pushed into the goal, how is it not a goal?
This game will be known as the Halifax screw job
there's a clear difference when he calls college hockey games.I mean I get how intense he is for the USA, its really comical
Game being played… in Canada
Game being played… in Canada
US might want to try scoring without goaltender interference. Generally a better strategy.
Or, the American screw up.This game will be known as the Halifax screw job
True, but refs will give you a pp, they're not going to start counting goals that shouldn't count because of it.They know it’s not a goal but who is going to advocate against their own team?
Can’t blame them for trying to get some PPs.
Refs were paid off apparently.
The refs are doing a good job of thatCanada needs to go for the kill shot. That probably took a lot of life out of the US.
sham of a team gonna win a sham of a game to win a sham of a tournament
celebrate your bullshit Canada.
To be fair, the USA coach pretty much underlined the problem with hockey rules in general by putting two fingers up. Because the first one should have counted, he obviously felt the refs owed them a goal that I'm sure he knew should not have counted. Game management/make-up calls are going to happen when you have a sport with such vague and seemingly fluid/arbitrary rules.Some posters are really outing themselves as not knowing the rules of hockey.