snipes
How cold? I’m ice cold.
- Dec 28, 2015
- 55,837
- 64,376
Just a great win.
This was a true team effort. O Canada.
This was a true team effort. O Canada.
Well, when it counted Hart was good.
Very pleased with that and he proved me wrong in the biggest game.
They played the Canadian way and just kept plugging away.
Feels good man.
It feels ****ing GREAT. Back on top.......................where we belong.
It's our game.
Can't wait until snipes jr. is old enough to skate, alas I will be pulling him in the sled tomorrow on the rinks.
Enjoy man!!! Do your best to make him into a hard ass d-man.
Make sure you get out on the ice too buddy if you're not snowed out in the east.
To be eligible to play for a country under IIHF regulations, there’s a number of requirements a player must meet, such as citizenship, certain amount of time residing/playing in the country in question, so on. You can look it up online. It’s funny, because Logan Brown wanted to and could have gone the Hockey Canada route a couple years back, but didn’t make the cut and thus went to USA Hockey. And yes, Hughes will be playing for the USAI’m actually asking how can Foote play for Canada if he was born in the US. I’m guessing that Hughes will be playing for the US?
Man that is a weak group of forwards. I just don't see where they think they are going to get goal scoring from.
I don't think I have ever remembered a tournament where Canada wasn't the best team (usually by far) but this year I would be shocked if they won a medal.
This always was a bit of a down year for Canada but they made it much worse with the selections.
Quelle surprise.Well, Baxterman, I can say you were completely wrong.
Well, that was a successful tournament for Canada. I am surprised by the gold medal game though. I can't remember a worse winning performance by Canada, but I'll take it, especially after Canada gave away a gold medal in the same building in 2011. The team had a good system and utilized its strengths well. Ducharme and company mostly picked the right players, and some of the off the map picks like Comtois and Formenton really did pay off. I would have changed the defencemen a bit but in the end winning is always enough.
I would like to highlight a few players who I think were really key for Canada. First off, Batherson. I've watched him in junior this year and his ascent was quite impressive, but I still didn't expect him to even make this team. In the end I think that he was Canada's best forward in the semi finals and the finals. No Canadian forward was as engaged and won battles as Batherson did against Sweden. Really great job for him. People have been comparing him to Stone, but I think that's influenced by the team that drafted him. His WJC performance and style, and his status as a late riser, remind me far more of Benn. I don't think that he will be as good as Benn but I do think that he could be a similar style player. I am happy for him, no one seemed to have a better attitude. I also really liked what Comtois brought. Comtois brought a classic Canadian element to this team and it was sorely needed. I didn't think that there was a spot for him after seeing him in junior several times but once again I am happy to have been wrong.
Mete was a critical addition to this team. I don't think that Canada wins if Mete wasn't loaned and other defencemen played more prominent roles. I think that he was Canada's best defensive defenceman and his skating was a legitimate asset. I also think that Timmins turned out to be critical and improved throughout the tournament to the point that he was critical in the final game. I didn't like Timmins' performances in the pre-tournament games or the Finland game, but he grew on me.
In the end I am of course pleased with this result. In my mind I connected this team to the 2017 team, partly because the teams shared players but mostly because of Ducharme. Canada played a very different style (compared to tradition) these past two tournaments and in the end it has been pretty successful. I was annoyed by losing in 2017 because I felt that Canada gave the gold away. I don't mind Canada losing when outplayed by a better team, but the 2017 situation left a bad taste in my mouth. This happened in 2011 as well. For me 2018 was almost a reverse, and I find going 1/2 out of these past two tournaments a fair result. Canada has underperformed at the WJC this decade with unacceptably poor results, so getting a tournament win was a relief. I will enjoy this win and I will remember this particular team as a very solid team that was one of the most balanced that Canada has sent to this tournament.
Now on to 2019.
Makar ended up being the "star" I guess one could say. The forwards all came together and did their job. It was good to see a team come together like that, maybe the sum was greater than the parts. What a gold medal winning team should be.Great to see a blue collar type Canadian team win it all, yes we were lacking that stand out star(s) but it was a balanced team with 4 quality lines and great goaltending. We're back on top of the Junior hockey world folks! enjoy it!
Feels like these golds mean so much more now that there is so much parity at this level. Which makes me value Canada's 2015 and 2018 golds very much..never know how long it will take to win another and that's good for the sport.
Good write up.
RE: 98 D-men. which one would you select to go to the WHC in May, Chabot (97. but a rookie) Girard, Mete or Makar? Chabot could probably play a legit number 7 D, limited minutes/PP time. but I'd like to see one of the 98s taken to get in a pre-tournament game and perhaps in a real game v 1 or 2 of the weaker teams.
The '98s pulled it off...after years of me fretting they wouldn't sniff a medal at this tourney. I'm shocked, thrilled, and as always, glad to be wrong. It was a fantastic game, not quite at the level of a Canada v USA GMG, but an A-. Clearly they were the 2 best teams of the tournament...could have gone either way...we just managed to pull it out.
I'm a little concerned now that Hockey Canada will follow this formula of a predominately 19 year old team. I would rather they not do that. I love Gold Medals, but tournament success and player development has to be worked into the cake as well. and that means high end draft eligible and draft+1 players. 1 part of the formula they can follow each year...I do love a team that can skate. I'm so tired of watching the Dylan Stromes of the world plot around on the ice time and time again.
but hey, I can't criticize Hockey Canada too much on player selection when they deliver the goods.
The good news, I'm not particularly high on the 99s either. so, that bodes well for next year's team.
I took a peek into the GDT...and as expected not worth anybody's time reading that nonsense.