Juxta Position
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2006
- 2,417
- 2,097
I don't believe that's what it is, In fact, the NHL had much better "plausible deniability" when there was only one ref on the ice to manage the game. Game management has always been a thing, the 70's and 80's were the wild west in the NHL but with only one ref on the ice the NHL could always use the excuse of "one man can't see everything going on out there". With two refs, one in the play and one behind it, they can't use that excuse anymore and fans have noticed how truly crooked the NHL officiating is when there are eyes on everything now.I've said many times before. Going to a 2 ref system sent the system into serious decline.
Expansion has not only meant a shortage of players but a shortage of capable refs. There doesn't seem to be enough to go around.
It's not a question of competency with the refs, it's mandate. the league tells the refs how they want the games officiated to create the most "excitement" and maintain Bettmans wet dream of league parity, and those refs are, in the NHL's eyes, knocking it out of the park.
Gary Bettmans job is not to protect the integrity of the game, it's to make money for the owners, plain and simple, he does not give two squirrely poo's about the game, the players, or anything else that does not directly involve making the most money he can for the owners. It's a business and he's there to make money, the reffing will never improve until the owners start to not care about profits, which will obviously never happen.,