Camera angle from behind the net during live play

Its great for power plays. If you are a student of the game, you can see things develop and get a sense of how time and space are used.
 
Like it for replays. Love it for a powerplay/penalty kill. The rest of the time I really don't like it.

The play can come into and out of the zone too fast/often to make a cut to that angle and back. That makes it disorienting. But for a PP situation you know there will probably be sustained pressure, and nothing much to see if the puck comes out. So it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kryten
Am I the only one who hates when a broadcast uses the camera angle that's behind the net during live play and not a replay? 85% of the time it's rarely a sequence that improves the viewing experience and sometimes you can hardly tell WTF is going on.

Let me know if I'm the minority here
1745958816873.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
Honestly I like the idea, although the execution is often kind of blah when the camera is too low and the goal obscures things.

In general though, how on earth we are still stuck with the bland sideview as default in 2025 is a crime. There should be cameras all over the ice in configurations like sliding rails just above the end zone glass, and the broadcast should use puck tracking to switch smoothly between views as the play develops.

Even 50 f***ing years ago broadcasts used to do more innovative things like tighter zooms on faceoffs, goals, and an inset view of a player jumping out of the penalty box. (I think I remember seeing inset views of goalies going to the bench for an extra skater as well)

The entire point of why new fans find it hard to enjoy hockey on tv is because the puck is hard to follow without instinctively recognizing context clues from the players. Giving them more angles to see the game from will make that easier
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad