GeeoffBrown
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2007
- 6,132
- 4,725
No. Ottawa was 6th and 2 points from 4th in the conference...they shouldn't be playing in a play in.
The east is back to be the weakest division by a margin but before you get all stuck up, it's just all it goes it swing back and forth every couple of years.
How much more betrayal can kadri take
Any team with a negative goal diff. doesn't belong in the playoffs.The Flames won 1 more game in regulation and 1 fewer game in ROW than Utah.
No, they absolutely did not deserve to make the playoffs.
East has a winning record vs West, and the worst team in East has 76 points while the worst in west has 52(3 under 76), but "East is the weakest."The east is back to be the weakest division by a margin but before you get all stuck up, it's just all it goes it swing back and forth every couple of years.
worst team in the East (Boston) had 76 points.This is a fallacy as they would’ve played different teams a different amount of times, and the three bottom teams on the west provided the most “gimmie” points by far.
CGY did not have a better regulation or coin flip recordKinda harsh that Calgary finished with a better regulation record than both the Blues and Wild, but they got torpedoed by a poor record in the coin flips (10-14 in OT/SO) while St. Louis was 12-8 and Minnesota was 12-7.
Calgary is weak.... the only reason they were in the playoff race is because they were 9-1 against SJ, Chicago and Nashville.The east is a perpetual joke lol. There was a stretch where all those teams competing for WC2 were below .500 in their last 10, all losing to each other
You played a lot of bad teams down the stretch and teams that were resting players in garbage timeCalgary's 27 regulation losses were also tied for the 7th fewest overall. Not bad for a team in Year 1 of a "rebuild."
This team absolutely deserved to make the playoffs.
What? You're missing the point.No chance? Montreal isn't THAT much better than them.