He's fine as a 6/7D for insurance. Anything above a 4th or 5th is an overpay though.he sucks. Hopefully nothing more than a 6th round pick
He's fine as a 6/7D for insurance. Anything above a 4th or 5th is an overpay though.
For Kulak. I will settle for a 3rd.On the Flames he may have been, on the Habs he's been better. He's been a good 5/6. Basically moved up one spot in the lineup.
BTW the rumored ask was a 2nd for Kulak from the Habs.
Not the same price. My guess is MTL asks for a 2nd for Kulak but a 3rd should be enough I believe (Dermott got a 3rd and I'd prefer having him over Dermott any time of the week)I'd prefer Soucy over Kulak..
Well of course, he's a better player. But the cost might be the kicker there. If Seattle got a 2nd for Lauzon, then they might be aiming even higher for Soucy, which would be a big overpay. If the price of Kulak is more reasonable (if its a 2nd, it isn't, ha ha), then it makes sense to look at Kulak. I was hoping for a better veteran option though.I'd prefer Soucy over Kulak..
I just don't want Holland to dish out a 2nd for Kulak. That's all, I'd rather have Niemelainen as #5D..Not the same price. My guess is MTL asks for a 2nd for Kulak but a 3rd should be enough I believe (Dermott got a 3rd and I'd prefer having him over Dermott any time of the week)
You will be surprise about Kulak. He has been decent in the playoff last year. Kulak can move the puck and provide some offense but he sometime will make stupid mistake. He will be decent on the 3rd pairing.Well of course, he's a better player. But the cost might be the kicker there. If Seattle got a 2nd for Lauzon, then they might be aiming even higher for Soucy, which would be a big overpay. If the price of Kulak is more reasonable (if its a 2nd, it isn't, ha ha), then it makes sense to look at Kulak. I was hoping for a better veteran option though.
I'd prefer if we did not do that.
The issue is that I was hoping for someone to help out our 2nd pairing - although it was 2RD I was really wanting help with and we're not even rumoured to be looking for that. That said, Kulak on Calgary wasn't good, but if he can bring the guy he was in the playoffs instead, I'd be okay with that.You will be surprise about Kulak. He has been decent in the playoff last year. Kulak can move the puck and provide some offense but he sometime will make stupid mistake. He will be decent on the 3rd pairing.
he sucks. Hopefully nothing more than a 6th round pick
This. I would easily take a 4th. Anything really.Don't think we'll get more than a 3rd or 4th for Kulak but I'll take it
He cost Montreal nothing at the time of acquisition, but is an ok 7th-8th defenseman. The type of guy you can acquire for a "conditional 7th" or "future considerations". So, anything recouped seems like it would be a win.
Probably a decent depth guy for a team like Edmonton who has a tough luck finding good defenders.