, I got the right video for you. But who doesn't love really ? He's like a future fan favorite !!
Everything about him is underrated. For me, one of the most projectible players in the draft. If you have a pick in the 6-8 range I don't know how you pass on him.
Both draft year risers but pretty different players I would say. Quinn had better hands and shot. Bear is less flashy but plays with way more motor/tenacity and still has good offense but I'd say relies more on getting to the net.
I usually suck at comps in my videos but that's exactly who he made me think of.
Nah, you take Bear 100% before Mrtka.
That is my thought too. If Seattle drops out of the top-5, I can certainly see them go for him. He would be the kind of winger who would be a good fit next to Beniers or Catton and play the type of game their lines need. That plus Seattle seems to spend a lot of time scouting the local WHL teams and would have a pretty good idea about him.
I think it's quite different. Primarily because a torn Achilles is likely the result of a combination of degeneration of the Achilles and surrounding stucture, and a trauma, which result in many points of failure for the Achilles. A laceration, depending on the severity, is going to be a much cleaner cut, and additionally, Bear's Achilles could have been otherwise healthy.
Krebs was a rough one too
