Yeah no. Stutzle is great but the guy looks like he has never played defense is his life. In 2017 Hischier came bursting on to the scene. Both Pettersson and Makar are better players but they took longer to develop like Byfield will. As for Sanderson, Drysdale is tracking better than him and I still think it was a mistake to reach for a defenseman in weak class. When their were better players on the board.
You do realize that you completely contradict your first statement with your second one. I'm of the belief that success in higher leagues out of the gate does count for something and Drysdale should be praised (same with Stutzle), but you are being ridiculous preaching patience for one person then bringing up Drysdale/Sanderson, it's either one or the other you can't pick and choose when to count early production and when not to. It's like when fans hype up the WJC when a prospect does well and then downplay it when another one doesn't (a common thing on this board)
I don't understand why fans trash on other prospects as a way to defend or hype up theirs. I don't know why my fellow Kings fans are so hesitant to give credit to Stutzle credit for his fantastic start, people bring up defense, yeah, he's terrible defensively in the NHL, Byfield is terrible defensively in the AHL, again so what, these are players who haven't asked to play defensive roles at any time in their lives. Montreal and Edmonton fans arguing over Caufield and Holloway, they are both great prospects who had fantastic seasons, one is more well rounded, one is more offensive, but we can't just say both are great?
Next year will be the big year for Byfield, he needs to establish himself as an NHL'er next season with the expectation that he is ready to start really making an impact as a 20 year old, if he keeps that path he will be fine, if he doesn't then we might have a problem.