C/LW Anton Lundell - IFK Helsinki, Liiga (2020, 12th, FLA) Part2 | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

C/LW Anton Lundell - IFK Helsinki, Liiga (2020, 12th, FLA) Part2

Man you told me Kakko was the most NHL ready prospect there ever was and would be a ppg player. And You made a separate burner account to try and reinforce the point...
You not replying to what I said above means that you in fact do not have any examples of Jokke Nevalainen being biased towards Finns. Can we assume you just pulled that out of your ass?

By the way, I've not made any new accounts. PM a mod and ask how many accounts have used this IP.

Pretty sure what you said about me is also not true, although I do think Kakko will be a PPG player. 99% of the time I spent talking about how Hughes was not nearly as good as people thought he was, my Kakko hyping was quite limited in comparison - though the vast majority of people, including you, thought I was putting Hughes down for the sake of pumping Kakko up, which wasn't the case. I just thought Hughes was quite disappointing and overhyped.

Nevertheless, it's curious how you continue being so obsessed with Finnish prospects.
 
Last edited:
Getting Boldy/Crouse vibes from this dude. Is he really a beast ? or just some safe bottom six nhler ? I need answers people !
 
Getting Boldy/Crouse vibes from this dude. Is he really a beast ? or just some safe bottom six nhler ? I need answers people !

For the life of me I cannot figure out why
 
Both Boldy and Crouse are wings, though i would argue pretty different types of players. Lundell is a C. I would say that those three players are pretty dissimilar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ippenator
Both Boldy and Crouse are wings, though i would argue pretty different types of players. Lundell is a C. I would say that those three players are pretty dissimilar.
as in high floor prospect / safe prospects. even if they don't hit they should be at least bottom six nhlers, thats what i mean. can you read ? or even try and put 2 and 2 together? hmm guess that answers my question that lundel is just a safe nothing burger prospect. total flop of a player.
 
Crouse- Big, physical power forward who plays with an edge.

Boldy- Smart, skilled offensive winger with good size. Not particularly physical.

Lundell- Smart, true two way C with good size. Offensive upside open to question.
 
Getting Boldy/Crouse vibes from this dude. Is he really a beast ? or just some safe bottom six nhler ? I need answers people !
I get Radek Faksa vibes from him which is still a valuable player but not someone who you'd wanna select in the top 10 IMO.

Good IQ (especially defensively) but overall has a very average offensive toolkit and probably below average skating as well to (although apparently is has improved but how much?)

One of the older players in the draft as well, only being 18 days off from being eligible in the 2019 draft as well, so thats probably something to keep in mind as well.
 
I get Radek Faksa vibes from him which is still a valuable player but not someone who you'd wanna select in the top 10 IMO.

Good IQ (especially defensively) but overall has a very average offensive toolkit and probably below average skating as well to (although apparently is has improved but how much?)

One of the older players in the draft as well, only being 18 days off from being eligible in the 2019 draft as well, so thats probably something to keep in mind as well.
Thanks for the honest take DIon, love you buddy !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dion TheFluff
I get Radek Faksa vibes from him which is still a valuable player but not someone who you'd wanna select in the top 10 IMO.

Good IQ (especially defensively) but overall has a very average offensive toolkit and probably below average skating as well to (although apparently is has improved but how much?)

One of the older players in the draft as well, only being 18 days off from being eligible in the 2019 draft as well, so thats probably something to keep in mind as well.
Radek Faksa isn't really a good comparable IMO. I think Lundell has him beat in most catgeories. I also don't know of the upside with him but I would say its definitely higher than Faksa who wasnt even a great junior player.
 
You not replying to what I said above means that you in fact do not have any examples of Jokke Nevalainen being biased towards Finns. Can we assume you just pulled that out of your ass?

By the way, I've not made any new accounts. PM a mod and ask how many accounts have used this IP.

Pretty sure what you said about me is also not true, although I do think Kakko will be a PPG player. 99% of the time I spent talking about how Hughes was not nearly as good as people thought he was, my Kakko hyping was quite limited in comparison - though the vast majority of people, including you, thought I was putting Hughes down for the sake of pumping Kakko up, which wasn't the case. I just thought Hughes was quite disappointing and overhyped.

Nevertheless, it's curious how you continue being so obsessed with Finnish prospects.

I mean its not tough to tell where his bias lies taking 5 minutes to scroll thru his twitter.

im sure a mod would disclose that....

You spent your time bashing Hughes and saying Kakko was a far superior prospect, and would have a more successful rookie year easily. He didnt

im not obsessed with Finnish prospects. I am curious about their fanboy poster’s delusions though
 
  • Like
Reactions: STLBLUES44
I think who ever gets Lundell, its Sebastian Aho all over again situation; awesome prospect, but for some reason falls in the rankings, ergo;
doesn't get drafted early as should of. Now Aho felled to the 2nd round, for some reason, Lundell is gonna get drafted in the 1st round thou.
 
I mean its not tough to tell where his bias lies taking 5 minutes to scroll thru his twitter.

im sure a mod would disclose that....

You spent your time bashing Hughes and saying Kakko was a far superior prospect, and would have a more successful rookie year easily. He didnt

im not obsessed with Finnish prospects. I am curious about their fanboy poster’s delusions though
Man you 2 should really get a room already
 
Floor of Radek Faksa, ceiling of Mikko Koivu. Split the difference and you get a 2C who scores 40-50pts. in his prime and plays vg+ defense. Not sexy, but very useful.
 
Floor of Radek Faksa, ceiling of Mikko Koivu. Split the difference and you get a 2C who scores 40-50pts. in his prime and plays vg+ defense. Not sexy, but very useful.

That is a very low end 2C. That's more of a high end 3C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sick Nuzuki

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad