Toggle sidebar

C Dylan Strome (2015, 3rd, ARI; traded to CHI) III

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
93LEAFS said:
He measured exactly 6'3 at the combine in 2015. He also seems to be listed at 6'3 most places (elite, nhl.com, ohl).
Click to expand...

Still looks way smaller to me on the ice. Probably his skating posture. I feel like he hunches his shoulders inward and it makes him look 5'11.
 
Strome should develop into a fine 1C. The coyotes are not in any rush so I don't have a problem with them easing Strome along. He'll likely make the opening night roster or at the very least be the first callup. The only reason he is getting picked apart is because Connor McDavid and Jack Eichel went ahead of him and Mitch Marner went right after him and is having an excellent rookie season. In a vacuum Strome is doing just fine. Strome is the perfect example of being too good for the OHL but unable to play in the AHL. I think the league needs to add an exception for certain players who should be in the AHL prior to turning 20.
 
93LEAFS said:
If he can clean up 3 things then he should be able to be an impact player next year. Primary focus for him should be improving his skating, particularly his acceleration. On top of that, he needs to get noticeably stronger. He'll never be an elite skater, so getting stronger so he can hold on to the puck longer to buy time for a shot or pass will be very important. He's a tall guy, but he hasn't really filled out. Finally, he needs to improve his release. His shot is great in regards to power and accuracy, but he telegraphs his wrist shots too much. He's a good kid and he works hard, I hope for his and Arizona's sake that he can make these improvements.
Click to expand...

You hit the nail on the head.
 
La Cosa Nostra said:
Strome should develop into a fine 1C. The coyotes are not in any rush so I don't have a problem with them easing Strome along. He'll likely make the opening night roster or at the very least be the first callup. The only reason he is getting picked apart is because Connor McDavid and Jack Eichel went ahead of him and Mitch Marner went right after him and is having an excellent rookie season. In a vacuum Strome is doing just fine. Strome is the perfect example of being too good for the OHL but unable to play in the AHL. I think the league needs to add an exception for certain players who should be in the AHL prior to turning 20.
Click to expand...
Totally agree, most CHLers have to spend 2 post draft seasons in the CHL, which is fine for the majority of them, but for other guys there's a clear wasted year or two. Strome is definitely in that "tweener" category, too good to learn much in the CHL, not good enough to make the NHL just yet.

Re: "Strome should develop into a fine 1C", not sure I agree. 1Cs are a rare breed, only the best of the best get there. I think Strome has a chance, for sure, but I'd guess he'll be more of a 2C. He's got high hockey IQ, good hands and a very hard/accurate shot, but is mediocre in a lot of other areas. He's not particularly strong, he's an average skater, the release on his shot is slow, and his compete level and defensive game is just so-so. He's certainly a very good prospect, and a dominant player at the CHL level, but I'm not sure I see him being a good 1C at the NHL level. He may play some 1C, but I don't think he'll be a good one, more of a natural 2C who might fill that role at times (kind of a toss up for how Dvorak vs. Strome vs. Keller will shake out, and Keller could possibly end up on the wing).
 
Last edited:
Strome's shot release varies depending on situation. He leans on wrist shot a lot to throw off goalies. I don't see his shot as a problem. Strength and intensity are the issues for me. He can fix the former, time will tell on the latter.
 
I think he is going to surprise some people next year when he is a rookie. He is almost forgotten this year in terms of the 2015 draft class of great prospects. I'm expecting a great rookie season from him. Wouldn't be shocked at all.
 
Yasuo said:
not really usefull i saw a lot of player who played less than 30 games in that list
Click to expand...

All 5 of them that are ahead of Strome and had under 30 games? and those 5 being Quinn, Lindros, Allison, Andreychuk and Spezza who are pretty safe bets to say they would likely have continued their production or close to it.

But i agree it's not a useful way to judge a player, i was just correcting the guy that said Strome only had 15 guys average 2.21 PPG before him
 
Jakey53 said:
Yeah, you guys are right. He should be getting at least 3PPG.:sarcasm::shakehead
Click to expand...

McDavid in draft year was 2.55 PPG, Strome at D+2 should be better than 2.21 IMO. He should be a better junior player than an 17-18 yr old McDavid at this age.
 
Pi said:
McDavid in draft year was 2.55 PPG, Strome at D+2 should be better than 2.21 IMO. He should be a better junior player than an 17-18 yr old McDavid at this age.
Click to expand...
Tavares never got past 2ppg. Strome's numbers are fine for what he is. The only other player in recent memory to get anywhere near McDavid's is Patrick Kane. I don't think we should expect anyone to put up McDavid like numbers in the OHL. McDavid was a ppg player as an 18-year-old and is a top 5 forward (being conservative) at 19. I don't think anyone even expects Strome to be a 60 point player in the NHL next year, so I don't know why you'd expect him to have numbers better than McDavid in juniors.
 
How has he played in the playoffs so far? He has 21 points in 15 games, but isn't in the top 5 in playoff scoring. Do you guys think he not meeting expectation?
 
MichaelFarrell said:
How has he played in the playoffs so far? He has 21 points in 15 games, but isn't in the top 5 in playoff scoring. Do you guys think he not meeting expectation?
Click to expand...

He had the flu in the first series against London. He is playing alright in the second. He hasn't dominated, but he hasn't been bad. Just doing his cerebral center thing. Absolutely brilliant with the puck, kind of rough and floaty away from it.

He's at least winning faceoffs for Erie. And the team winning is what I want to see, as Strome racking up points is not necessarily an indicator that he's playing as he should.
 
I see him being the player who manages to stay in the NHL producing or not. Though I think he'll average 50 points a season.
 
Erie wins the OHL title, Strome assisting on a game tying goal as the extra attacker and on the OT winner. Pretty happy with his play overall. Skating looks improved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom