- Sep 16, 2020
- 782
- 807
We must be watching vastly different players.I have watched dozens and dozens of games of his before finally realizing yesterday who he reminds me of so much. Jean Béliveau. It is not a perfect comparison especially because I mostly watched Le Gros Bill later games, when he was older and more mature and complete. But I’m convinced this is the kind of player Gauthier can become with the right attitude, if he’s driven adequately by the right motivations. I have rarely seen someone with that particular of skillset. It seems so effortless for him because he has such a physical advantage over his opponents, but his biggest asset is his brain. The speed at which he process information is very similar to Béliveau, and then, there’s the size obviously. He is a typical dual threat, great shot, but if he can unleash it it’s because the opponents know they have to respect his playmaking abilities. Béliveau was also a very underrated defensively useful guy.
If he can put behind him the trade distractions he’s gonna be a star in the league : not calling him a future hall of famer, multiple Stanley Cup winner, best captain in the history or anything like that. But he plays like Béliveau and he will score goals like he did and punish other teams.
Special.
Honestly, a physical shooter that is hard to play against is exactly what the Ducks are missing. That would be perfect.We must be watching vastly different players.
I see Gauthier play a very direct, relatively uncreative "shoot first, shoot often, shoot more" offensive game. He does stand out for his physicality, and he does have a very hard shot. But he reminds me more of a poor man's Ovechkin. Shots, shots, shots, some of which are snipes and some of which are just spraying it to the net over and over again.
I do think he'll be a pain in the ass to play against but I'm way far away from thinking he has a shot at being the kind of player you're describing.
I know... as a Sharks fan, I'm fully expecting to really dislike Gauthier. He also just has that smugness asshole factor. Not quite punk status like Perry, but definitely a little bit of that Getzlaf swagger (to be clear I do not think he is a Getzlaf level prospect).Honestly, a physical shooter that is hard to play against is exactly what the Ducks are missing. That would be perfect.
Gauthier is absolutely a player who will fit the Ducks well, I don’t think anyone can deny that. In fact, I think he’ll benefit from not having to be “the guy” and not having to play center.Honestly, a physical shooter that is hard to play against is exactly what the Ducks are missing. That would be perfect.
Gauthier is playing on Smith’s wing tonight, so it should be a good preview for Ducks fans for what he could look like on Zegras’ wing some day.
Gauthier's issue isn't the defensive zone responsibility, he's plenty good enough there and responsible there. He's BC's go to match up defensively to shut down the best forward on the other team and does a good job at it. It's carrying the puck up the ice and neutral zone where he makes a lot of mistakes. I just don't think he doesn't have the vision and poise for it as a #1 center but I think he has all the skills needed for a top line winger. Ultimately it becomes, what do the ducks think they can develop, Zegras's defensive zone presence or Gauthier's neutral zone/transition gameI don't know why a team with that much forward talent to choose from would put a weaker defensive player (Zegras) in the position where he has to defend down low in his zone. Gauthier would be better at it. Really with Carlsson and McTavish there's no need for either to play center.
Gauthier's issue isn't the defensive zone responsibility, he's plenty good enough there and responsible there. He's BC's go to match up defensively to shut down the best forward on the other team and does a good job at it. It's carrying the puck up the ice and neutral zone where he makes a lot of mistakes. I just don't think he doesn't have the vision and poise for it as a #1 center but I think he has all the skills needed for a top line winger. Ultimately it becomes, what do the ducks think they can develop, Zegras's defensive zone presence or Gauthier's neutral zone/transition game
I agree it is not appropriate. Obviously Gretzky is betterGauthier is absolutely a player who will fit the Ducks well, I don’t think anyone can deny that. In fact, I think he’ll benefit from not having to be “the guy” and not having to play center.
But the Jean Beliveau comparison suggests the hype is a little out of hand.
Gauthier is playing on Smith’s wing tonight, so it should be a good preview for Ducks fans for what he could look like on Zegras’ wing some day.
You obviously dont have to be in agreement with me and your evaluation of his play is as good as mine. However as someone like me who believes in reincarnation I’m struck by the parallels, it’s uncanny.Gauthier is absolutely a player who will fit the Ducks well, I don’t think anyone can deny that. In fact, I think he’ll benefit from not having to be “the guy” and not having to play center.
But the Jean Beliveau comparison suggests the hype is a little out of hand.
Gauthier is playing on Smith’s wing tonight, so it should be a good preview for Ducks fans for what he could look like on Zegras’ wing some day.
You’re totally right, it’s really been fans of other teams. Every Ducks fan I’ve seen has been very reasonable about Gauthier, to be honest.I agree it is not appropriate. Obviously Gretzky is better
But seriously, I don’t think any Ducks fans are expecting anywhere close to that and if they are then that’s on them.
These went from 0 to Weird really fastYou obviously dont have to be in agreement with me and your evaluation of his play is as good as mine. However as someone like me who believes in reincarnation I’m struck by the parallels, it’s uncanny.
Every time I watch his game, I’m fazed by the way the puck always end up on his stick even though he is never looking at the puck. He always keep his head up, always picking his spot, visualizing his shot in his head, always thinking 10 seconds ahead, that reminds me of the great Béliveau.
It’s like the puck is watching him. In some ways I feel like there’s a spiritual connexion between Gauthier and the puck, like they are fundamentally linked some way in the universe.
Very impressed by that goal on the PK, create the turnover with his big body, anticipate the trajectory of the puck (where most individuals could only guess where a puck will bounce, he knows right away its future, like a medium reading the destinies in the palms), get it and score. This is Cutter Gauthier to me.
We already built him a statue in front of Honda center, whachu talking boutYou’re totally right, it’s really been fans of other teams. Every Ducks fan I’ve seen has been very reasonable about Gauthier, to be honest.
3 point game!
Including this snipe..
Zegras at center is not the same as Smith at center. Fun concept but don't think its a good idea.I don't know why a team with that much forward talent to choose from would put a weaker defensive player (Zegras) in the position where he has to defend down low in his zone. Gauthier would be better at it. Really with Carlsson and McTavish there's no need for either to play center.