JA
Guest
Based on what I've seen, it seems that Connor McDavid's skill set is not as diverse as Sidney Crosby's. His weakest attribute is his shot. He doesn't appear to score many goals with his shot nor does he take too many long-distance shots. Everything is scored from around the net.He is not better then Crosby overall. Crosby is a once in a lifetime athlete which we might not see again in the history of modern era Hockey.
The hype will die down after people realize McDavid's talents are generational but even he will not reach the level of play of #87.
His entire 2014-15 playoff goal reel consists of him speeding down the right wing and cutting towards the net, hanging around the crease and behind the goal line, breakaways, and occasionally a chance in the low slot. He needs to be around the net to score goals.
His assists, meanwhile, seem to come off the rush, as well as from quick, blind passes from behind the goal line or at the side of the net to his teammates.
Connor is a sneaky, accurate passer with great speed and a very quick, deceptive hands. He has a few primary tendencies, but his strategy of attack is not particularly varied, and his arsenal is not all that diverse.
The greatest NHL players are unpredictable; they have a variety of different skills that they can rely on, and possess exceptionally creative minds. Connor risks being a predictable player. NHL coaches and the league's top defensemen will figure out how to neutralize their opponent's tendencies; that never stopped the best players of all time from being extremely effective, but I don't know if Connor's talents are diverse enough for him to overcome those obstacles and to ever meet the ridiculous expectations that have been placed on him.
As I was looking through video today of the McDavid reports, one scout said that Connor was a cross between Rick Nash and Patrick Kane. Kane himself is a pretty tricky hockey player, and while Connor is a faster skater, Kane has two skills that McDavid lacks -- a great slap shot and a deadly wrist shot.
I have to ask myself how much better Connor could be than Patrick Kane. Kane can rifle the puck, which makes him dangerous anywhere in the offensive zone.
Connor might be one of the better offensive players in the NHL when he reaches his prime, but I just see him being another very skilled player among the NHL's roster of impressive talents. I don't think he is at all "The Next One."
Last edited by a moderator: