-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Ziggy Stardust
Master Debater
It basically means that a player will be passing up his eligibility for unrestricted free agency when he signs a contract that "eats up UFA years." Hope that makes sense.
As soon as a players contract is expired he's a UFA, unless he's an RFA which brings a whole different set of rules. So how does a players UFA years disappear unless he retires?
SLang
Registered User
I think an example would be, say a player is eligible to be a UFA at age 28, but at, say 25 he's a RFA and signs a 5 year deals that expires when he's 30. He will have eaten up 2 of his UFA years (years 28-30).
Reclamation Project
Cut It All Right In Two
- Jul 6, 2011
- 34,135
- 3,783
If he's an RFA at 25, that has nothing to do with being a UFA at 28; he has yet to sign a contract stating how many years he will be employed by that franchise. Should I quit?
The Slap Shop
Shop Like a King
- Dec 23, 2002
- 3,806
- 2
Every player hits his UFA Year when he turns 27. Only exception to this is players who start playing in the NHL when they are 18 or 19, then they have to play 7 seasons to accrue UFA Status(Doughty is one King who had this)
So now when Doughty got off his Entry Level Contract(Known as an ELC) which is automatically 3 years. He was 21 years old and was headed towards free agency at the ripe age of 25.
When Doughty signed his gigantic contract 8-year contract, he cut into 4 years that are considered his "UFA" years.
What many considered changed the landscape of how contracts are handled is when Kevin Lowe gave Dustin Penner his huge RFA Offer Sheet which Anaheim refused to accept(Taking a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Round Pick). Teams could no longer ease a player into his 2nd contract(Ideally take a player who just got off his ELC of 3 years, then try to sign him for another 3 years which would leave him 1 year short of becoming an UFA)
So now when Doughty got off his Entry Level Contract(Known as an ELC) which is automatically 3 years. He was 21 years old and was headed towards free agency at the ripe age of 25.
When Doughty signed his gigantic contract 8-year contract, he cut into 4 years that are considered his "UFA" years.
What many considered changed the landscape of how contracts are handled is when Kevin Lowe gave Dustin Penner his huge RFA Offer Sheet which Anaheim refused to accept(Taking a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Round Pick). Teams could no longer ease a player into his 2nd contract(Ideally take a player who just got off his ELC of 3 years, then try to sign him for another 3 years which would leave him 1 year short of becoming an UFA)
King'sPawn
Enjoy the chaos
- Jul 1, 2003
- 23,150
- 24,009
It means that for a certain period of time, a player's rights are owned as a restricted free agent. I don't know the specifics, but at a certain time, a player becomes an unrestricted free agent, and can sign with any team on the open market (presumably for more money, as open market leads to max # of bidders).
So eating up UFA years is when a player is currently a restricted free agent, but the length of the contract takes them beyond when they first would hit the open market, thus "eating up" those years.
For example, if a player is 22 and he would be a UFA at 25, and he signed a 7 year deal, the contract would "eat up" 4 UFA years since his contract goes 4 years past the time he first becomes a UFA.
So a player will be an RFA until he's 27 no matter what kind of contract he signs? And if player X signs a 6 year contract when they're 24, they will have eaten 3 years into their UFA years? Am I getting this correctly?
Vamos Rafa
Registered User
When exactly does the 27-years old rule apply? A player born in 1986 turns 27 in this calendar year, but that player's birthday is in October. Would he be a UFA in this offseason?
The Slap Shop
Shop Like a King
- Dec 23, 2002
- 3,806
- 2
You can also be a UFA at the age of 25(If you started in the NHL at the age of 18) and 26(If you started at the age of 19)
There are some other rare exceptions to UFA Rules, like a Group 5(hard to actually do) or Group 6(Actually possible, but it's a long explanation) free agent
Reclamation Project
Cut It All Right In Two
- Jul 6, 2011
- 34,135
- 3,783
The Slap Shop
Shop Like a King
- Dec 23, 2002
- 3,806
- 2
The Slap Shop
Shop Like a King
- Dec 23, 2002
- 3,806
- 2
Since I didn't remember this either. Other ways you can be a UFA.
Bought out(See Nathan Gerbe)
Did not get qualified(See Gulliaume Latendresse)
Then again if either of these things happen, you probably suck.
Bought out(See Nathan Gerbe)
Did not get qualified(See Gulliaume Latendresse)
Then again if either of these things happen, you probably suck.
Thanks for the clarification. I get the basics of it. Just when it comes to the CBA details I'm lost.
The Slap Shop
Shop Like a King
- Dec 23, 2002
- 3,806
- 2
understandable. I try to read the CBA and pray I understand the damn thing. I just spent the last 30 minutes working on Waivers and signing undrafted players.
Rorschach
Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Well bottom line is when both the sides, player and organization, get together at the bargaining table, they both already know exactly what year the player will qualify to become a UFA (if he has no contract with the organization that had owned his rights).
So when any new contract signed by the player as either a new contract when he's a RFA or an extension, whatever years go past RFA and into UFA are considered UFA years "eaten."
Basically everyone knows a player makes less money as a RFA because he can't go to the highest bidder while an UFA can do exactly that. So those years are considered years that he should have gotten paid more.
In Dustin Brown's case, he gave every single UFA year up to the Kings for much less money that he could have gotten and thus a lot of the members on HFBoards who said the Kings got a good deal, good value, good signing, they're right and it's because of so many UFA years that DB gave to DL, making sensible money instead of making Zach Parise money. So you can say pretty much he and his family are committed to the Kings for (his playing) life. And I guarantee if either Luc or Dean are still there 10 years from now, he will have a job with the organization for sure.
So when any new contract signed by the player as either a new contract when he's a RFA or an extension, whatever years go past RFA and into UFA are considered UFA years "eaten."
Basically everyone knows a player makes less money as a RFA because he can't go to the highest bidder while an UFA can do exactly that. So those years are considered years that he should have gotten paid more.
In Dustin Brown's case, he gave every single UFA year up to the Kings for much less money that he could have gotten and thus a lot of the members on HFBoards who said the Kings got a good deal, good value, good signing, they're right and it's because of so many UFA years that DB gave to DL, making sensible money instead of making Zach Parise money. So you can say pretty much he and his family are committed to the Kings for (his playing) life. And I guarantee if either Luc or Dean are still there 10 years from now, he will have a job with the organization for sure.
