Ray Kinsella
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2018
- 2,105
- 955
I think you make a good point about calling people bots. When you see it, feel free to report it for moderator review and I'll endeavor to address it whenever I see it as well.
How dare you! I take offen... oh wait... but I am a bot... but I said I agree calling posters bots is bad... but I am a bot.. but I said that calling posters bots is bad... but...Does this mean I can’t call you Micklebot?
We already have 2 7+M players , soon to be 3. OEL is one guy. I am not really comparing Ottawa to them because I was assuming , at that time, Karlsson would get Subban money and up. Not to mention the likes of Stone, Turris etc...that needed raises too.
I have always felt that this team could compete with anyone based on a maxed out revenue scenario i.e. full , paid building. I think it will once , or if, that ever happens
We already have 2 7+M players , soon to be 3. OEL is one guy. I am not really comparing Ottawa to them because I was assuming , at that time, Karlsson would get Subban money and up. Not to mention the likes of Stone, Turris etc...that needed raises too.
Next year we will only have one and I am sure Dorion will be instructed to do everything in his power to attach the Ryan contract to the Stone or Duchene trade.
Your argument still isn't valid and you really didn't answer my post. You claim the Sens are unable to sign their key players because of the poor attendance and you blame the fanbase for this, but why are the Arizona Coyotes able to keep their key players and attract free agents with an attendance that's about half of what the Sens get AND they have had no playoff revenue in what 5 years? (please don't say weather, I know someone will)
Resigning OEL was a non issue, I am sure resigning Galchenyuk will also be a non issue. Only in Ottawa do we not retain our star players because according to you and a few others, we are bad fans. .
Hmmmm, imagine if we didn't give both of our goalies big money extensions , or if Zach Smith was allowed to walk or was moved instead of signing a multi year multi million dollar extension with a big picture plan of saving money so that we could resign Karlsson, Turris/Duchene, Stone, etc. Imagine if this organization actually had a "plan" and not this mythical non-existant "plan" Dorion keeps referring to.
I could go on, imagine acquiring draft picks to help this supposed "rebuild" instead of a 4 million dollar player in the downswing of his career. Another 4 million saved for a supposed "budget team" where we could use the money to pay Stone or Duchene or even Karlsson for that matter....not trading for Burrows would have meant even more money saved...
Lots of bad bad contracts handed out to marginal players throughout the years, yet not enough money to resign our stars! Fantastic business model!
BEERS!?
No to hot water, and , honestly, with 12K in attendance, ushers seem pleniful!I'd be down for "hot water in the washroom" themed nights; or "fully staffed event employees" theme nights. Have those returned, serious question, for those who are going to games presently?
I am not sure about next year yet.
I did answer your question. You just didn't like it or agree. Ryan is within a million of OEL's extension. Stone too. Ottawa has had decent revenues but going to the next step of signing Stone and Duchene, and to a lesser extent Dzingel, will rely more on revenues. Arizona singed one guy. One. Ottawa can do that. three is a different challenge. That requires better revenues than Arizona. And Arizona receives the highest equalization payments in the NHL, with Ottawa soon to join that sorry group. No one knows how that will help the Sens, as I imagine it will. I have seen numbers as high as 10M.
We can revisit this when we see what happens with Stone and Duchene.
Heck, even Free Wifi night wouldn't be so bad.No to hot water, and , honestly, with 12K in attendance, ushers seem pleniful!
No to hot water, and , honestly, with 12K in attendance, ushers seem pleniful!
Thanks.
When I held tickets in the more recent years (as late as last year), I'd make a point of interacting with people who work there, casually: ushers, aramark/vendors employees, custodians, security, etc. The message was clear over numerous interactions, but specific to the ushers who you singled out, that they were woefully understaffed (yes, I would ask). From my own observation, the reduction in ushers had happened before attendance numbers dropped off. I verified this one game in talking with an older usher (I assume from her presumed age, she had been there a while, anyway), who said they were cutting back on event staffing for several years. She toed the line carefully (I don't blame her), but she was nonetheless candid.
The ushers must seem plentiful now, but this is another chicken/egg thing: from my experiences, staff cuts were happening at all levels for longer than would allow the argument to support the link between attendance and staffing cuts. I mean, Melnyk himself said they were running a bare bones front office. We also know they were running a bare-bones game day operations staff, to me, to the detriment of those who went. Hearing these people, themselves, validate the speculation, although not surprising, was telling.
My seats for regular season games were mostly 100s and 200s corners/ends, while I tended to shift up higher for playoff games (aside from treating myself to a game or two down low in the spring). I noticed, going back to 2013 at a minimum Sens/Habs ECQF, that there were no ushers in many sections of a sold out venue. It definitely impacts the experience, as generally the masses are ignorant, hence the need for flow-control.
No, this is not why I'm not buying tickets currently, but many, many scalpel nicks (some sharper than others) are the reason.
To be honest, I'll give them credit for trying new things with the whole "date night" or whatever it is. I mean, I think it'll fail, but I recognize that they're trying SOMETHING. I'm glad they are trying new things; that's a start. I do agree with those who said it smells kind of like the Renegades "mardi-gras" nights - I know it's not - but it still seems a bit tone deaf to what actually needs fixing, which is the parallel I'm drawing. I don't think boobs will be popping out at CTC - though this is Melnyk's team - you never know what the next idea might be.
In any case, without a doubt, they were slashing these types of things for a long time. Longer than can be explained away correlating it to attendance. I know you didn't say this in your post, I just have a tendency to springboard when I post lol.
Thanks.
When I held tickets in the more recent years (as late as last year), I'd make a point of interacting with people who work there, casually: ushers, aramark/vendors employees, custodians, security, etc. The message was clear over numerous interactions, but specific to the ushers who you singled out, that they were woefully understaffed (yes, I would ask). From my own observation, the reduction in ushers had happened before attendance numbers dropped off. I verified this one game in talking with an older usher (I assume from her presumed age, she had been there a while, anyway), who said they were cutting back on event staffing for several years. She toed the line carefully (I don't blame her), but she was nonetheless candid.
The ushers must seem plentiful now, but this is another chicken/egg thing: from my experiences, staff cuts were happening at all levels for longer than would allow the argument to support the link between attendance and staffing cuts. I mean, Melnyk himself said they were running a bare bones front office. We also know they were running a bare-bones game day operations staff, to me, to the detriment of those who went. Hearing these people, themselves, validate the speculation, although not surprising, was telling.
My seats for regular season games were mostly 100s and 200s corners/ends, while I tended to shift up higher for playoff games (aside from treating myself to a game or two down low in the spring). I noticed, going back to 2013 at a minimum Sens/Habs ECQF, that there were no ushers in many sections of a sold out venue. It definitely impacts the experience, as generally the masses are ignorant, hence the need for flow-control.
No, this is not why I'm not buying tickets currently, but many, many scalpel nicks (some sharper than others) are the reason.
To be honest, I'll give them credit for trying new things with the whole "date night" or whatever it is. I mean, I think it'll fail, but I recognize that they're trying SOMETHING. I'm glad they are trying new things; that's a start. I do agree with those who said it smells kind of like the Renegades "mardi-gras" nights - I know it's not - but it still seems a bit tone deaf to what actually needs fixing, which is the parallel I'm drawing. I don't think boobs will be popping out at CTC - though this is Melnyk's team - you never know what the next idea might be.
In any case, without a doubt, they were slashing these types of things for a long time. Longer than can be explained away correlating it to attendance. I know you didn't say this in your post, I just have a tendency to springboard when I post lol.
We've had the usher with the mohawk for as long as I can remember.
Oh, that's Mark, I believe.
You lucked out, he's one of the best ushers in the building. Dude's been there forever, and always looks out for the folks in his sections.
That's right, Mark! In our section. We have a lot of seniors and he is sure to look after them.
At what point does the NHL have to step in and investigate?
If there's any links to the Sens, this isn't a good image for the NHL. Using Russian/Trump tactics to attack the local media and spew false facts.
Brutal.
To be honest, I’m finding the media just as silly (as whoever is responsible) to be emphasizing on this.
To be honest, I’m finding the media just as silly (as whoever is responsible) to be emphasizing on this.
To be honest, I’m finding the media just as silly (as whoever is responsible) to be emphasizing on this.
... the media just as silly (as whoever is responsible) to be emphasizing on this.
To be honest, I’m finding the media just as silly (as whoever is responsible) to be emphasizing on this.
Why?
Disinformation campaigns are a big deal right now. We can't afford to let it just become an acceptable thing.