TopShelfGloveSide
Registered User
- Dec 10, 2018
- 18,572
- 35,048
Unless it’s high stick or off side most reviews are a bit subjective.The trouble is plays can be complex involving many things. Its not debatable there was a push. its not debatable the player fell into Skinner. The part thats more subjective is whether Bennett fell too much. At some level thats the determination. Its not a 100% clear one. Its about surmising whether a player play acted the stumble or really stumbled.
I do feel it was a 50/50 or at least that it was going to be goal stands or a chance of that. Even if its 60/40 in favor of callback I don't make that challenge. I don't defer to the probability in this I defer to hockey being a momentum game and so if a team scores don't give them an immediate chance at another. Don't compound it.
LA made a mistake with their challenge and the Oilers did too. The difference is this club was good enough to bail out the error.
Another odd thing in the commentary is people say they don't trust the officiating to get the call right and yet they support the coaching challenge in purview of that. I can't reconcile the views on that. There was a considerable chance the Oil wouldn't be getting this call.
Corey Perry? How many times did this board complain about one of his goals when he wasn't an Oiler.
Perry is a perfect example actually. We got a goal when he “accidentally” interfered with Dallas but the then the next time he pulled it they called him on it… which is totally fair. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. History should absolutely factor into decisions.