Post-Game Talk: Build The Wal

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Come on, Tkachy! We're all waiting for you to tell us that McDrai failing to deliver is the biggest reason why we didn't win it all!

You have so many people on your side right now, you won't get this opportunity again!

Teams that scored one goal were 3-34 in the playoffs last season. One of those wins was actually a Skinner shutout in the first round.

Blaming a goalie for losing a game in which his team only scored one goal is objectively crazy, especially when the team is supposed to be built around its offence like ours is. We aren't the dead puck era New Jersey Devils, our forwards need to show up if we are going to win. Saying that Draisaitl and McDavid (and every forward outside of Janmark) failed in game seven doesn't diminish what they did throughout the rest of the playoffs, it's just a fact. It's very, very hard to win playoff games when you score one goal.

If a person who could see the future told HFOil that Skinner would only allow two goals in game seven the people on here would've been celebrating. If the same person instead told us that McDavid, Draisaitl, Nuge, Hyman etc. would have zero points we would've said we're f***ed. Skinner did his job by putting the team in a position to win. The forwards didn't show up. That's just the reality of the situation.

Sorry you missed the game and didn't see that weak goal get by. Guess what would happen if that goal didn't get by?

The team would have another 20-minute period with a chance to score. It's called overtime.
 
Last edited:
Teams that scored one goal were 3-34 in the playoffs last season. One of those wins was actually a Skinner shutout in the first round.

Blaming a goalie for losing a game in which his team only scored one goal is objectively crazy, especially when the team is supposed to be built around its offence like ours is. We aren't the dead puck era New Jersey Devils, our forwards need to show up if we are going to win. Saying that Draisaitl and McDavid (and every forward outside of Janmark) failed in game seven doesn't diminish what they did throughout the rest of the playoffs, it's just a fact. It's very, very hard to win playoff games when you score one goal.

If a person who could see the future told HFOil that Skinner would only allow two goals in game seven the people on here would've been celebrating. If the same person instead told us that McDavid, Draisaitl, Nuge, Hyman etc. would have zero points we would've said we're f***ed. Skinner did his job by putting the team in a position to win. The forwards didn't show up. That's just the reality of the situation.
Yup...for 3 games this team scored 0.67 goals per game. Not enough to win anything.
A little bit of objective truth.

I think we know how well that is going to go over on here. :nod:
 
  • Like
Reactions: OilerTyler
we will see what Necas gets, one thing that Rantanen has over Necas is playoff success and numbers (59 GP - 11 G, 19 A for 30 P) for Necas, while Rantanen is (81 GP - 34 G, 57 A for 101 P) - This isn't even close. Rantanen is 2 years older, sure, some of it is playing in Colorado with 29 and 8, but not all of it. Rantanen is a stud, even more so in the playoffs. I think you're reading into a small Rant in Carolina and Necas in Colorado sample size. Rantanen is the better player, and if Necas gets 10 million per plus, I dont see that deal being better than Rantanen at 12 million per. 13 poor games with a new team in Carolina after getting blindsided by a trade does not undo how good Rantanen is.
Just another comment but Rantanen EV goal scoring is really down this year at only 18. A further footnote is that this season Rants has 7 ENG. So that it distorts whats been a pretty shitty finishing year for him. he's a player that gets fed premium looks constantly and he's not delivering this season. Mirage or is this his goal scoring starting to slide?

Who knows what Necas gets but young faster and I think more topside still. Necas is an excellent player.

Necas has matched Rantanen production all season. Not just in short sample. He's blazing fast and stretches D. Necas gives the whole offense more room and thats really suited to Colorado as well.

Credit AV's for finding a guy wherein they don't miss Ranta much. Hard to replace a guy like that but they did. Carolina are dunces. Parlayed Necas-Rants-> NOTHING. Hilarious fireable asset management on part of Canes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iCanada
I thought his recent play lowered the number of Stu Simps, but they were just in hiding and came out in full force on deadline day, and are still thumping their chests over an .840 that was not, in any way, shape, or form, his fault, guys! Any shot that is hard to stop cannot and will not be stopped by any goalie in this league, period. Anyway, none of the goals were really muffins so I didn't feel the need to argue with them. Just glad the team won. Besides, my neck is still sore from shaking my head over all the donkey-brained clown world takes on deadline day...
Yeah they hide when Stu stinks and come out punching the moment he makes some stops. That said Ott was terrible yesterday and once again managed to be worse than Skinner. Really if I'm Ott I'd be ashamed how poorly he's matched up against Skinner of all goalies. Its one of the only matchups where we get better goaltending. Ott can catch fire at anytime but he can doom a team anytime too. he even lost in playoffs to the Flames a few years back.
 
You are 100% correct but because you are stating the obvious and going against the "Hate Skiner cult" you open yourself up for attack/insults.

Its a black and white issue after all...no nuance...no room for discussion. One side against the other...lol

No appetite for actually looking at a play objectively.
3 goals in the 3rd period....must mean Skinner is to blame. No room for discussion here.
Either you blame everything on Skinner or you are part of the "Love Skinner Cult"...."Skinner simps"...etc.
Such a joke.

All the while I see posts like..."checking with the legs means no hitting"...."Knoblauch is coaching the team to be soft"...etc.
Posts that are so f**king ridiculous and yet they merit discussion. LOL

On the other hand trying to understand the reason for a goal...things like how a play broke down and discuss what really happened is forbidden conversation lest you be branded as a Skinner Simp.

This place is like Junior f**king High School sometimes.
/rant
I think at one time there was a nuanced debate and discussion around Skinner and his play. People also recognized that Stuart was new to the league and they cut him some slack on that front.

But he’s no longer a new goalie. He’s been here for a while. He continues to have minimal consistency in his starts which should have been something that came around by now.

And then all of this has been shrouded in the constantly displayed lack of accountability that he has developed for some reason. It’s been off-putting for a lot of people, myself included that group, who have just had enough. It’s one thing to be confident (every NHL players needs to have a level of basic confidence) but a player who is letting in weak goals game after game, not holding the fort for his team, showing some gaps in his fundamentals and then comes out in the post game scrums saying how well he played without any recognition of where he could have been better, rightly turns people into non supporters and/or worse.
 
Teams that scored one goal were 3-34 in the playoffs last season. One of those wins was actually a Skinner shutout in the first round.

Blaming a goalie for losing a game in which his team only scored one goal is objectively crazy, especially when the team is supposed to be built around its offence like ours is. We aren't the dead puck era New Jersey Devils, our forwards need to show up if we are going to win. Saying that Draisaitl and McDavid (and every forward outside of Janmark) failed in game seven doesn't diminish what they did throughout the rest of the playoffs, it's just a fact. It's very, very hard to win playoff games when you score one goal.

If a person who could see the future told HFOil that Skinner would only allow two goals in game seven the people on here would've been celebrating. If the same person instead told us that McDavid, Draisaitl, Nuge, Hyman etc. would have zero points we would've said we're f***ed. Skinner did his job by putting the team in a position to win. The forwards didn't show up. That's just the reality of the situation.
Gee we havent heard about game 7 SC final enough times. keep bleating on about it in every f***ing thread.

WTF kind of talking point. Gee show us highlights for more misery. Most people want to forget about it.

Tyler: remember when we lost game 7 scoring 1 goal....bleh
 
Yeah they hide when Stu stinks and come out punching the moment he makes some stops. That said Ott was terrible yesterday and once again managed to be worse than Skinner. Really if I'm Ott I'd be ashamed how poorly he's matched up against Skinner of all goalies. Its one of the only matchups where we get better goaltending. Ott can catch fire at anytime but he can doom a team anytime too. he even lost in playoffs to the Flames a few years back.

Well, now we all know that Tkachy isn't the only one pinning the lion's share of blame on generational players whose only mistake was not be able to outscore Gretzky and Lemieux, and not being able to score on a goalie standing on his head...all to defend the goalie who let in the one softie all game.

It's so hilarious to see Tobias bitch about the goaltending again while also liking posts that contradict what he's saying... I wonder how much of his reaction score are unwanted laugh reacts?

Seeing them all try to take me on feels like I wandered into a flat earth conference. Yeah, I'm in the minority, but...
 
End of the day, all I care about is if our tender is better than the goalie at the other end of the ice and if we won the game. Analyzing every goal against and getting irate after every game, win or lose, is a sure way to go stir crazy. I would have preferred an upgrade in goal, but we I can't change the fact that we are set in goal for the rest of the year. Have a couple of choices as fans, accept that fact, and cheer for the team and hope for the best, recognizing that our goaltending isn't our strong point, and it is what it is, and that posting the same angry verbiage a half dozen or so times a day isn't going to change that, or go full burn the village 24/7, and lose focus of what you actually started cheering for in the first place. I went thru my rage stage when Eakins was here, and finally realized how self destructive it was, how being obsessed with that was missing the forest for the trees.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, another 5 minutes and Dallas likely scores and it head to OT. That's how little faith I have in Stu Skinner now. Whether the goals were his fault or he had a chance is besides the point. He does this all the time. If it's not giving up 3 goals in a period, he's not doing the little things like swallowing up easy shots, giving away the puck etc. It is what it is but as a fan you just have to shake your head. You don't feel comfortable with him in net because there's zero trust. And I guarantee a lot of his teammates feel the same way. Hard to accept it when you know come playoff time he's going to blow games. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12
Being in Ontario I only caught the first half of the game too. Walman looked like a #1 dman out there. It honestly reminded me of Ekholm's first game here when it was a shock for us to see what a real dman could look like. If Ek is back to form when he returns, look out!

Coming to Edmonton for a few home games the week after this. Hoping this team keeps building back in the right direction.
Remember all those years between 2018-2022 that Gregor and co tried to convince us that Nurse was a top pair Dman and thus should be paid like one? Then Bouchard developed. Then we got Ekholm. And now we see with Walman. No shot at Nurse, he's always been an average 2nd pairing guy, but the local media saying he's a #1 all those years is hilarious.
 
End of the day, all I care about is if our tender is better than the goalie at the other end of the ice and if we won the game. Analyzing every goal against and getting irate after every game, win or lose, is a sure way to go stir crazy. I would have preferred an upgrade in goal, but we I can't change the fact that we are set in goal for the rest of the year. Have a couple of choices as fans, accept that fact, and cheer for the team and hope for the best, recognizing that our goaltending isn't our strong point, and it is what it is, and that posting the same angry verbiage a dozen or so times a day isn't going to change that, or go full burn the village 24/7, and lose focus of what you actually started cheering for in the first place. I went thru my rage stage when Eakins was here, and finally realized how self destructive it was, how being obsessed with that was missing the forest for the trees.

I'm pretty sure everyone bashing Skinner actually cheers him on at these games. I know I do. And we actually want to be proven wrong, in contrast with the other side of this debate, who seem to take more joy in showing us up and "riding and dying" than actually seeing our team reach its full potential.

It becomes even more pathetic when you read the posts above and see these self-proclaimed Oiler fans who would rather throw McDrai under the bus than admit the problem in net.

You know why players actually want to play here now? It's not because of the city and its "beautiful River Valley." And I'm sorry, but it's not the fans either. It's pretty much entirely because of Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl (Oh, and our generosity with NMCs...). And you know why we aren't enduring yet another decade of darkness like Buffalo is? Take a wild guess.

After enduring decades of mediocrity and outright failure, this team is (was?) not only a contender but has generational talents doing shit we haven't seen since Mario and Wayne, and it couldn't be any more clear what is obviously holding us back, based on every possible shred of proof that seems to exist, and should be plain as day to the vast majority of us...yet somehow isn't because some people here think that blind obedience is synonymous with fandom. Or are strangely devoted to an objectively mediocre goalie.

The problem is, this is year 3 of the Skinner experiment. He's played in six playoff rounds, imploded in three of them, and is looking worse than ever this season. Can you blame actual fans of this team for being a little concerned and even upset that our most glaring weakness wasn't addressed going into a critical year for the McDrai era?
 
Last edited:
What goal was on Oettinger? Two breakaway goals, McDavid skating him and the defense out of position for a Hyman tap-in, the rocket one-time to the corner by Arvidsson, or a wide open net gimme because his defenseman blocked a pass right back to Brown?

He also saved numerous in close attempts that the Oilers should have cashed in. Edmonton could have had 5-6 goals after the first period alone.
You can’t blame him for those going in, but statistically speaking most goalies will stop at least two of them. Edmonton’s xGF yesterday was a touch above 3 and Oettinger let in 5. Again, you can’t blame him, but if you give him do-overs then he’ll more than likely stop two of those.

For the poster that said Stu played “great” last night. No he didn’t. He let in one goal above expected and couldn’t shut the door when we needed to clot off the bleeding. I’ll completely agree though that’s it’s not all Stu’s fault. He’s a backup goalie, paid like a backup and he’s now the #1 on a cup contender. That’s on management for putting him in that position by crapping the bed with Campbell and not getting someone else this season. It doesn’t mean Stu’s let off of the hook for everything though. His numbers are still worse than the backups for many teams.
 
I'm pretty sure everyone bashing Skinner actually cheers him on at these games. I know I do. And we actually want to be proven wrong, unlike the other side of this debate, who seem to take more joy in showing us up and "riding and dying" than actually seeing our team reach its full potential.

It becomes even more pathetic when you read the posts above and see these self-proclaimed Oiler fans who would rather throw McDrai under the bus than admit the problem in net.

You know why players actually want to play here now? It's not because of the city and its "beautiful River Valley." And I'm sorry, but it's not the fans either. It's pretty much entirely because of Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl (Oh, and our generosity with NMCs...). And you know why we aren't enduring yet another decade of darkness like Buffalo is? Take a wild guess.

After enduring decades of mediocrity and outright failure, this team is (was?) not only a contender but has generational talents doing shit we haven't seen since Mario and Wayne, and it couldn't be any more clear what is obviously holding us back, based on every possible shred of proof that seems to exist, and should be plain as day to the vast majority of us...yet somehow isn't because some people here think that blind obedience is synonymous with fandom. Or are strangely devoted to an objectively mediocre goalie.

The problem is, this is year 3 of the Skinner experiment. He's played in six playoff rounds, imploded in three of them, and is looking worse than ever this season. Can you blame actual fans of this team for being a little concerned and even upset that our most glaring weakness wasn't addressed going into a critical year for the McDrai era?
This post captures a lot of the thoughts on this. Good rundown!

You mean superskinner is not why players come here?

Its the thing. Watching year after year of subpar depth or goaltending has killed off the first decade of the best players in hockey being here. We should be able to talk about two cups by now. Instead its maybe if Stu turns into some fascimile of a goalie we maybe have a chance. jebus.

if this org keeps screwing the pooch it would go down in infamy as the two best players never to lift a cup. Why? Oilers management. Thats it, thats all.
 
I think at one time there was a nuanced debate and discussion around Skinner and his play. People also recognized that Stuart was new to the league and they cut him some slack on that front.

But he’s no longer a new goalie. He’s been here for a while. He continues to have minimal consistency in his starts which should have been something that came around by now.

And then all of this has been shrouded in the constantly displayed lack of accountability that he has developed for some reason. It’s been off-putting for a lot of people, myself included that group, who have just had enough. It’s one thing to be confident (every NHL players needs to have a level of basic confidence) but a player who is letting in weak goals game after game, not holding the fort for his team, showing some gaps in his fundamentals and then comes out in the post game scrums saying how well he played without any recognition of where he could have been better, rightly turns people into non supporters and/or worse.
I get where you are coming from here.
Apologies in advance for the long resposne but I need to provide some context.

One of the things thats very apparent on here (and with most fans) is that they are very impatient. It is likely even worse with Oilers fans because we have lived with bad teams for a lot of years.
Its easy for all of us to get caught up emotionally with the reality of a recent game or recent string of games. Its happened to me too which is why I try (if possible) to wait a while before posting after a game.

So when evaluating a player I do try (not always successful though) to take a 20,000 foot view of things. Thats what I have tried to do with the team overall this season. Try to get some clarity regarding why we are seeing the results on the ice. Obviously that applies to evaluating players.
With forwards the evaluation process is shorter so we can get a sense about a forward (especially a winger) much quicker than other positions.

Defence and Goaltending require more time though. In terms of the defence I think that Emberson is doing really well considering that he hasnt quite played 100 NHL games yet. I thought one of the best comments on here (cant remember the poster) was about how young Dmen usually fade over the course of their first full season because they havent yet adjusted to the grind. Great comment IMO and I hope that a lot of posters saw that and take it into consideration if and when Embersons games starts to fade.

With Goalies its similar but because they are the last line of defence there is obviously more pressure on them to perform well each game. So in most cases (unless the goalie is uber talented) it takes time cultivate the mental toughness necessary to be a starter. So they are a backup at the NHL level for a significant period of time. That was the thinking for Skinner as well.
Due to the Campbell signing that plan was overturned. Skinner got exactly 13 games as a backup in 2021/22 and then was forced into the starting role in 2022/23.

Kevin Woodley is someone I really respect when it comes to breaking down goalies and in his opinion it takes multiple seasons (20 -30 games a season) as a backup in the NHL to properly prepare to be a starting goalie in the NHL.

Again...Skinner had 13 games. So if we remember that Emberson comment...players playing a tough position like defence and goalie can do well to start and then fade for a bit until they can adjust mentally to the grind.
That process is amplified for a goalie and Skinner didnt even have the luxury of having a couple of seasons to ramp up to adjusting to the mental and physical grind of being a starter.
He was thrust into it.

So the first year he was IMO very good. He started 48 games and had a sv% of 0.914 which is very good in the NHL for any starting goalie much less a rookie who was thrown into the position well before he should have been. He started 12 games in the playoffs (0.883 sv%) and he struggled under the heightened pressure and expectations. To be expected.

The next year he started to struggle a little here and there...started 57 games and had a sv% of 0.905.
In the playoffs he started 23 games and had a 0.901 sv%.
Now here we are in year 3 for Skinner as a starter and he has had trouble (like the entire team) at maintaining a high level of play.

When I take a 20,000 foot view of this player I have to include his very unconventional pathway to being an NHL starter. Virtually no mentering prior to being an NHL starter and the mentoring he did have was from Jack 'sadsack' Campbell. Not exactly ideal at all. As a matter of fact I would say that it was detrimental to have Jack Campbell involved in mentoring Skinner in any capacity. He was a dark cloud hanging over himself, Skinner and the team IMO.

So I think that also likely explains why Skinner has such a casual approach to any negativity...call it the anti Jack Campbell approach who used to have post game pressers that were cringeworthy to listen to.
So I if thats how Skinner can deflect from putting too much pressure on himself then I dont much care about it. I dont beleive for a second that he doesnt care.

So getting back to his play in net...again I defer to Kevin Woodley who sees an NHL starting goalie in Skinner. What he really needed was a capable starter ahead of him for a couple of seasons and the Campbell failure made sure that didnt happen.
As a plan B he needed a capable 1A/1B starter to help him adapt to being an NHL starter.
That didnt happen either. That is on management not Skinner.

So now we get to this teams defensive play.
I watch the games quite carefully and I usually have the game archived so I can watch things more than one time. I dont do that every time but I do look at plays more than once quite a bit especially when it comes to the goals against because I want to try and determine where the breakdown occured and who was responsible. Thats when I started to see just how many uncontested shots this team gives up. Then when I checked the HDSC stats I could see how they just werent granular enough. They werent providing accurate information. Those numbers didnt differentiate between a puck being slammed into a goalies pads fron 6 inches away from a shot in the mid to low slot. They also didnt differentiate between a contested and uncontested shot.
So the HDSC stats are almost (not quite) useless in determining with any accuracy the actual high danger events in a game. Thats when I realized how limited those stats were and yet they were being thrown around on here as definitive. They are anything but definitive...they are as I said barley useful.

So all of that leads me to looking at Skinners game a little differently. The defensive breakdowns this team has this season (for approx 2 and a half months so far) are mostly caused by poor puck magament (causing a odd man rush against) or poor coverage (causing an uncontested HD shot against).
These are scoring opportunities you just dont see contending teams like Florida and vegas giving up all that often...so their goalies dont have to deal with the fallout nearly as much.
Not with the Oilers though...Skinner has had to deal with a ton of that nonsense and when I factor in that he is still a goalie learning how to be an NHL starter (he has played 147 regular season games as a starter) I tend to cut him a little slack.

Thats why I find this repeating narrative on here blaming Skinner for everything so myopic.

Apparently though, on here, that justifies name calling because I (and some other posters) are not part of the collective negative opinion on Skinner. So we get attacked...lol
It really is like Junior High School. Agree with the group or pay the price!!!

I am going to highlight this part because it will surely get ignored....for me it wouldnt matter if the goalie was Skinner or any other goalie when I look at the big picture I would cut them some slack.
Its not about being a Skinner fan its about critically looking at everything in play.
Everything I detailed above.
When you do that its very clear....management f**ked this up.


Lastly you have to consider the pay sacle...Skinner isnt even getting paid to be a legit NHL starting goalie and yet thats the expectation. If this team was so concerned about goaltending then they wouldnt have the lowest allotment of cap space left for their goaltending....yet thats what they have.
They would at least be willing to pay for a capable 1A/1B starting goalie to support their still very inexperienced starter.

So why would I get pissed at Skinner for that?
That is also on Management.

I have no problem being in the minority on here so IMO I think Skinner does have enough tools to be a starter. I think he needs to trim his weight by 20 lbs (to help his lateral movement) and I also think that he needs a better quality tandem goalie to help mentor him but apparently the team doesnt feel that way.

So now we have Skinner and Pickard in net going into the playoffs. The ONLY way I see that working is for this team to start playing the structured hockey they have shown that they are capable of playing.
I have said this many times...if this team can play shitdown hockey they have more high end offensive talent than any other team so they should win most games.

That for me is the key to winning in the playoffs so I am trying to focus on looking forward...not back.

Good for you if you managed to hang in there until the end of this post.
Fire away. :D
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bellagiobob
You can’t blame him for those going in, but statistically speaking most goalies will stop at least two of them. Edmonton’s xGF yesterday was a touch above 3 and Oettinger let in 5. Again, you can’t blame him, but if you give him do-overs then he’ll more than likely stop two of those.

For the poster that said Stu played “great” last night. No he didn’t. He let in one goal above expected and couldn’t shut the door when we needed to clot off the bleeding. I’ll completely agree though that’s it’s not all Stu’s fault. He’s a backup goalie, paid like a backup and he’s now the #1 on a cup contender. That’s on management for putting him in that position by crapping the bed with Campbell and not getting someone else this season. It doesn’t mean Stu’s let off of the hook for everything though. His numbers are still worse than the backups for many teams.
Both goalies weren't much last night and Skinners puck play with 2mins left was a typical dunce play. I mean Rantanen was right there and he's freezing there with the puck. Another whoops I f***ed up again. Guess what we're talking about if thats the tying goal. Well we are anyway because we've seen this guy create a GA out of nowhere so many times and at worst times.

Ott was real bad last night but 15X a season he steals games for his team on off nights. We almost never get that here.
 
I get where you are coming from here.
Apologies in advance for the long resposne but I need to provide some context.

One of the things thats very apparent on here (and with most fans) is that they are very impatient. It is likely even worse with Oilers fans because we have lived with bad teams for a lot of years.
Its easy for all of us to get caught up emotionally with the reality of a recent game or recent string of games. Its happened to me too which is why I try (if possible) to wait a while before posting after a game.

So when evaluating a player I do try (not always successful though) to take a 20,000 foot view of things. Thats what I have tried to do with the team overall this season. Try to get some clarity regarding why we are seeing the results on the ice. Obviously that applies to evaluating players.
With forwards the evaluation process is shorter so we can get a sense about a forward (especially a winger) much quicker than other positions.

Defence and Goaltending require more time though. In terms of the defence I think that Emberson is doing really well considering that he hasnt quite played 100 NHL games yet. I thought one of the best comments on here (cant remember the poster) was about how young Dmen usually fade over the course of their first full season because they havent yet adjusted to the grind. Great comment IMO and I hope that a lot of posters saw that and take it into consideration if and when Embersons games starts to fade.

With Goalies its similar but because they are the last line of defence there is obviously more pressure on them to perform well each game. So in most cases (unless the goalie is uber talented) it takes time cultivate the mental toughness necessary to be a starter. So they are a backup at the NHL level for a significant period of time. That was the thinking for Skinner as well.
Due to the Campbell signing that plan was overturned. Skinner got exactly 13 games as a backup in 2021/22 and then was forced into the starting role in 2022/23.

Kevin Woodley is someone I really respect when it comes to breaking down goalies and in his opinion it takes multiple seasons (20 -30 games a season) as a backup in the NHL to properly prepare to be a starting goalie in the NHL.

Again...Skinner had 13 games. So if we remember that Emberson comment...players playing a tough position like defence and goalie can do well to start and then fade for a bit until they can adjust mentally to the grind.
That process is amplified for a goalie and Skinner didnt even have the luxury of having a couple of seasons to ramp up to adjusting to the mental and physical grind of being a starter.
He was thrust into it.

So the first year he was IMO very good. He started 48 games and had a sv% of 0.914 which is very good in the NHL for any starting goalie much less a rookie who was thrown into the position well before he should have been. He started 12 games in the playoffs (0.883 sv%) and he struggled under the heightened pressure and expectations. To be expected.

The next year he started to struggle a little here and there...started 57 games and had a sv% of 0.905.
In the playoffs he started 23 games and had a 0.901 sv%.
Now here we are in year 3 for Skinner as a starter and he has had trouble (like the entire team) at maintaining a high level of play.

When I take a 20,000 foot view of this player I have to include his very unconventional pathway to being an NHL starter. Virtually no mentering prior to being an NHL starter and the mentoring he did have was from Jack 'sadsack' Campbell. Not exactly ideal at all. As a matter of fact I would say that it was detrimental to have Jack Campbell involved in mentoring Skinner in any capacity. He was a dark cloud hanging over himself, Skinner and the team IMO.

So I think that also likely explains why Skinner has such a casual approach to any negativity...call it the anti Jack Campbell approach who used to have post game pressers that were cringeworthy to listen to.
So I if thats how Skinner can deflect from putting too much pressure on himself then I dont much care about it. I dont beleive for a second that he doesnt care.

So getting back to his play in net...again I defer to Kevin Woodley who sees an NHL starting goalie in Skinner. What he really needed was a capable starter ahead of him for a couple of seasons and the Campbell failure made sure that didnt happen.
As a plan B he needed a capable 1A/1B starter to help him adapt to being an NHL starter.
That didnt happen either. That is on management not Skinner.

So now we get to this teams defensive play.
I watch the games quite carefully and I usually have the game archived so I can watch things more than one time. I dont do that every time but I do look at plays more than once quite a bit especially when it comes to the goals against because I want to try and determine where the breakdown occured and who was responsible. Thats when I started to see just how many uncontested shots this team gives up. Then when I checked the HDSC stats I could see how they just werent granular enough. They werent providing accurate information. Those numbers didnt differentiate between a puck being slammed into a goalies pads fron 6 inches away from a shot in the mid to low slot. They also didnt differentiate between a contested and uncontested shot.
So the HDSC stats are almost (not quite) useless in determining with any accuracy the actual high danger events in a game. Thats when I realized how limited those stats were and yet they were being thrown around on here as definitive. They are anything but definitive...they are as I said barley useful.

So all of that leads me to looking at Skinners game a little differently. The defensive breakdowns this team has this season (for approx 2 and a half months so far) are mostly caused by poor puck magament (causing a odd man rush against) or poor coverage (causing an uncontested HD shot against).
These are scoring opportunities you just dont see contending teams like Florida and vegas giving up all that often...so their goalies dont have to deal with the fallout nearly as much.
Not with the Oilers though...Skinner has had to deal with a ton of that nonsense and when I factor in that he is still a goalie learning how to be an NHL starter I tend to cut him a little slack.

Thats why I find this repeating narrative on here blaming Skinner for everything so myopic.

Apparently though, on here, that justifies name calling because I (and some other posters) are not part of the collective negative opinion on Skinner. It really is like Junior High School.

I am going to highlight this part because it will surely get ignored....for me it wouldnt matter if the goalie was Skinner or any other goalie when I look at the big picture I would cut them some slack.
Its not about being a Skinner fan its about critically looking at everything in play.
Everything I detailed above.
When you do that its very clear....management f**ked this up.


Lastly you have to consider the pay sacle...Skinner isnt even getting paid to be a legit NHL starting goalie and yet thats the expectation. If this team was so concerned about goaltending then they wouldnt have the lowest allotment of cap space left for their goaltending....yet thats what they have.
They would at least be willing to pay for a capable 1A/1B starting goalie to support their still very inexperienced starter.

So why would I get pissed at Skinner for that?
That is also on Management.

I have no problem being in the minority on here so IMO I think Skinner does have enough tools to be a starter. I think he needs to trim his weight by 20 lbs (to help his lateral movement) and I also think that he needs a better quality tandem goalie to help mentor him but apparently the team doesnt feel that way.

So now we have Skinner and Pickard in net going into the playoffs. The ONLY way I see that working is for this team to start playing the structured hockey they have shown that they are capable of playing.
I have said this many times...if this team can play shitdown hockey they have more high end offensive talent than any other team so they should win most games.

That for me is the key to winning in the playoffs so I am trying to focus on looking forward...not back.

Good for you if you managed to hang in there until the end of this post.
Fire away. :D
tl/dr

I know you won't see this but imagine thinking somebody is going to read a 5page long post. Nobody would.

Stop writing War and Peace. Not even Oilerbears posts were this long. scroll scroll scrolll

hf could need another server just to show your several page long posts. I'm on computer here. Imagine trying to read your posts on a smartphone. lol
 
Last edited:
tl/dr

I know you won't see this but imagine thinking somebody is going to read a 4page long post. Nobody would.

Stop writing War and Peace. Not even Oilerbears posts were this long. scroll scroll scrolll

hf could need another server just to show your several page long posts. I'm on computer here. Imagine trying to read your posts on a smartphone. lol

This is a little harsh, but if I'm being honestly, I didn't read it either.
 
This is a little harsh, but if I'm being honestly, I didn't read it either.
Nobody would. Its the whole point. Not really that harsh either. I'm verbose, but this guy is over the top. MOST of his posts are over a page long and basically because he's typing in free form thought not composing, editing, or even knowing what he's going to write. Its like watching Skinner in net not knowing what he's doing next. lol

seriously its 150lines of text. Trying to break a record.
 
Lastly you have to consider the pay sacle...Skinner isnt even getting paid to be a legit NHL starting goalie and yet thats the expectation. If this team was so concerned about goaltending then they wouldnt have the lowest allotment of cap space left for their goaltending....yet thats what they have.
They would at least be willing to pay for a capable 1A/1B starting goalie to support their still very inexperienced starter.

So why would I get pissed at Skinner for that?
That is also on Management.

I have no problem being in the minority on here so IMO I think Skinner does have enough tools to be a starter. I think he needs to trim his weight by 20 lbs (to help his lateral movement) and I also think that he needs a better quality tandem goalie to help mentor him but apparently the team doesnt feel that way.

So now we have Skinner and Pickard in net going into the playoffs. The ONLY way I see that working is for this team to start playing the structured hockey they have shown that they are capable of playing.
I have said this many times...if this team can play shitdown hockey they have more high end offensive talent than any other team so they should win most games.

That for me is the key to winning in the playoffs so I am trying to focus on looking forward...not back.

Good for you if you managed to hang in there until the end of this post.
Fire away. :D

Nobody is actually upset with Skinner the person here. We are upset with management for forcing him into a situation where he's in over his head. I mean who would expect any professional goalie to turn down an opportunity to be the starting goaltender for the team they grew up watching?

He's living his dream and that's great for him, but for many of us it's creating new nightmare scenarios...
 
Nobody is actually upset with Skinner the person here. We are upset with management for forcing him into a situation where he's in over his head. I mean who would expect any professional goalie to turn down an opportunity to be the starting goaltender for the team they grew up watching?

He's living his dream and that's great for him, but for many of us it's creating new nightmare scenarios...
He grew up watching Mario Bros and Donkey Kong. Lets be real. ;)
 
tl/dr

I know you won't see this but imagine thinking somebody is going to read a 5page long post. Nobody would.

Stop writing War and Peace. Not even Oilerbears posts were this long. scroll scroll scrolll

hf could need another server just to show your several page long posts. I'm on computer here. Imagine trying to read your posts on a smartphone. lol

I feel bad laugh-reacting at that! Sorry Guymez!

Just a suggestion, Guymez, but it might help breaking up your manuscript into chapters and adding a TOC. I think there's an app for that.

Sorry! I couldn't help myself!!
 
Nobody is actually upset with Skinner the person here. We are upset with management for forcing him into a situation where he's in over his head. I mean who would expect any goalie to turn down an opportunity to be the starting goaltender for the team they grew up watching? He's living his dream and that's great for him, but for us it's creating new nightmare scenarios...
100%.
I have taken positions in my life that I knew inside that I wasnt quite ready for because I was confident in my ability.
I knew that I could figure it out given the opportunity.

I have no doubt thats something along the lines of what Skinner is thinking.
This was a dream opportunity for him...in his home town no less.

I just wish that Management would have been a lot more diligent in supporting him since 2022/23.
I mean its a very important position so the fact that they didnt prioritize it is really baffling.
 
Last edited:
This post captures a lot of the thoughts on this. Good rundown!

You mean superskinner is not why players come here?

Its the thing. Watching year after year of subpar depth or goaltending has killed off the first decade of the best players in hockey being here. We should be able to talk about two cups by now. Instead its maybe if Stu turns into some fascimile of a goalie we maybe have a chance. jebus.

if this org keeps screwing the pooch it would go down in infamy as the two best players never to lift a cup. Why? Oilers management. Thats it, thats all.

Actually it doesn't. That poster isn't mature enough to understand being objective, as is demonstrated by his post history.

A game can be won or lost by a goalie, but it can also be won or lost by the rest of the team. Or sometimes bad luck or bounces

He attacks anyone who doesn't blame Skinner 24/7 for every single goal and calls them simps when they point out facts and logic.

Saying a game or a goal was not indeed Skinners fault doesn't make them a Skinner groupie or apologist. That ironically makes someone the actual simp as its childish mentality

Last nite was a perfect example. All those goals were far from his fault and legit goals. That's not apologetic..that's just reality

Ironically, again, only a real simp would break down an entire game into just one position...constantly
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MessierThanThou
Nobody is actually upset with Skinner the person here. We are upset with management for forcing him into a situation where he's in over his head. I mean who would expect any professional goalie to turn down an opportunity to be the starting goaltender for the team they grew up watching?

He's living his dream and that's great for him, but for many of us it's creating new nightmare scenarios...
I'd even say that at 26, that is young for a goalie, and maybe Skinner does put the final pieces together sooner rather than later. He was better last year in the playoffs than he was the year before. He might still have room to grow
 
Actually it doesn't. That poster isn't mature enough to understand being objective, as is demonstrated by his post history.

A game can be won or lost by a goalie, but it can also be won or lost by the rest of the team. Or sometimes bad luck or bounces

He attacks anyone who doesn't blame Skinner 24/7 for every single goal and calls them simps when they point out facts and logic.

Saying a game or a goal was not indeed Skinners fault doesn't make them a Skinner groupie or apologist. That ironically makes someone the actual simp as its childish mentality

Last nite was a perfect example. All those goals were far from his fault and legit goals. That's not apologetic..that's just reality

Holy shit do I ever live in your head.

I'm actually starting to get cozy here. So much empty space!
 

Ad

Ad