Buffalo Sabres have lost 11 in a row.

KeyserSoze81

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
1,854
2,360
Rochester, NY
And if they’d stayed they would’ve had success together.
But they wouldn't have, specifically because they surrounded them with terrible coaching, substance abuse-addled veterans (ROR, Robin Lehner), and immature morons like Evander Kane. Buffalo had a limited window to turn things around with Eichel and Reinhart, and they missed it. Eichel wanted out, and Reinhart wanted out after Eichel was leaving.
They managed to alienate their best player by not listening to his wishes. The injury might have been unlucky, the way they handled it was idiotic.
Eichel had requested a trade a year before. It was already over. The injury was a vehicle by Eichel's camp to push the issue to a head - if they were on better ground, I guarantee that they would have reached a reasonable reconciliation (despite gross mismanagement by the Sabres).

I am not excusing the Sabres; indeed, I hate them and want the franchise to fold rather than ruining the few good memories of the sport that I still possess. But you cannot keep unhappy talent around forever and somehow achieve success.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,742
51,665
What did Sakic's org do until getting their grubby little mitts on a certain Patrick Roy and Mike Keane? As a Habs fan I remember that trade. 29 years later and I still remember. Maybe you're just too young to remember.
I remember it well.

What they didn’t do was trade Joe Sakic.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,742
51,665
But they wouldn't have, specifically because they surrounded them with terrible coaching, substance abuse-addled veterans (ROR, Robin Lehner), and immature morons like Evander Kane. Buffalo had a limited window to turn things around with Eichel and Reinhart, and they missed it. Eichel wanted out, and Reinhart wanted out after Eichel was leaving.
Okay. But giving away those players certainly didn’t help. So why would they want to repeat those mistakes?
Eichel had requested a trade a year before. It was already over. The injury was a vehicle by Eichel's camp to push the issue to a head - if they were on better ground, I guarantee that they would have reached a reasonable reconciliation (despite gross mismanagement by the Sabres).
Sure. Bad luck and they made it worse. I’m not defending what went down there. Just saying that people using this as an argument against rebuilding are missing the point- it’s not rebuilding if you trade your best player/prospects away. That’s an aborted rebuild and it sucks.
I am not excusing the Sabres; indeed, I hate them and want the franchise to fold rather than ruining the few good memories of the sport that I still possess. But you cannot keep unhappy talent around forever and somehow achieve success.
Sure. That was a unique case and as I said, it’s bad luck - whether they exacerbated it or not.
 

Panthaz89

Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
Dec 24, 2016
14,079
6,342
Buffalo,NY
Hey, I still remember Tim Murray's interview at the 2015 draft saying you can't be upset walking into the offseason with Eichel and newly acquired E. Kane and Ryan O'Reilly. This was after his rant about losing the McDavid lottery.

That 2014-2015 Buffalo tank was insane. Anyone who could make a save was shipped out immediately and Sabres players were visibly upset when Sabres fans were cheering goals against at home.
No they weren't they were traded shortly before the deadline and the Sabres lost like every game in January. Literally any other GM would have accepted those trades if the team offered it to them at that point of the season they shipped out two below average goalies and got another one back. People were just mad because McDavid was available that year.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad