- Feb 24, 2018
- 6,764
- 7,307
This has been talked about in other thread, respectfully no need to create another oneJust spit balling ideas. Buffalo allegedly is moving on from some players, some other teams have players out there.
Who adds to each of these trades?
Dunno about adding, but subtracting Byram out of the MN trade is a start. As mentioned. Very little need whatsoever for defense for the Wild. Scoring is the need. Centers & wingers.Just spit balling ideas. Buffalo allegedly is moving on from some players, some other teams have players out there.
Who adds to each of these trades?
I don't think that makes Buffalo a better team so why would they do it?Just spit balling ideas. Buffalo allegedly is moving on from some players, some other teams have players out there.
Who adds to each of these trades?
No, take out Byram and Brodin out of this deal.Peterka & Byram
For
Rossi & Brodin
NMC drops off completely once July 1st hits this year. Could be an interesting twist.I honestly wouldn't have that much of an issue with Brodin being dealt. While I wouldn't say I'm looking for them to get him gone, I personally think they should (for once) trade a player while they can still get good value for him. He's getting older. While I wouldn't call him fragile, he's not had a full season in a good while. I think he'd be a good trade to a team that's deeper into their window. The Wild aren't quite there yet. So if they can get a good young defenseman for him that can slot into the top 2-3 spot sooner rather than later, then you do that. To me, Byram isn't it. At the very least, he's not what they should be after. I think he's more risk than reward at this point.
The other important detail is, he [Brodin] has a NMC. So, unless it's to a team that's in the thick of things, he's probably not doing that. And Buffalo ain't it.
Expires July 1.I honestly wouldn't have that much of an issue with Brodin being dealt. While I wouldn't say I'm looking for them to get him gone, I personally think they should (for once) trade a player while they can still get good value for him. He's getting older. While I wouldn't call him fragile, he's not had a full season in a good while. I think he'd be a good trade to a team that's deeper into their window. The Wild aren't quite there yet. So if they can get a good young defenseman for him that can slot into the top 2-3 spot sooner rather than later, then you do that. To me, Byram isn't it. At the very least, he's not what they should be after. I think he's more risk than reward at this point.
The other important detail is, he [Brodin] has a NMC. So, unless it's to a team that's in the thick of things, he's probably not doing that. And Buffalo ain't it.
What exactly does Buffalo need outside of a defensive RHD?There are other threads these could gave been put in as separate posts
Peterja>>Nemec
Byram~Rissi
Buffalo dies not need Rossi
I got some really, really bad news for youDunno about adding, but subtracting Byram out of the MN trade is a start. As mentioned. Very little need whatsoever for defense for the Wild. Scoring is the need. Centers & wingers.
Picks & defense are not interesting.
Coach, GM, and owner. Not necessarily in that order.What exactly does Buffalo need outside of a defensive RHD?
Everyone needs those most in a 6'2 220lb frame, but those players aren't common. But when it comes to what you're giving up to get him in this hypothetical scenario, Peterka doesn't have those either.
Yeah? Tell me less.I got some really, really bad news for you
What exactly does Buffalo need outside of a defensive RHD?
Nuh. They don't. Buium is likely that answer. Thanks anyway.I actually like this for all teams. Nicely done.
Minny needs a pp1 guy and that can be Byram. Let Faber be the all around guy and spurgeon isn’t the best there.
Not many successful teams have a 19-year-old running their power play.Nuh. They don't. Buium is likely that answer. Thanks anyway.