- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,024
- 20,866
Eriksson Ek and Brodin for Peterka and Byram
+ something if needed
You are way off
Eriksson Ek and Brodin for Peterka and Byram
+ something if needed
Where is this stud two way 2c you speak of?In what world do you think wild are going to trade their 1c and stud two way C for a winger? LOl Not happening. Ek isn't getting traded and he's not waiving
wild aren't trading Brodin for Byram. Ek is beyond Untouchable
I still think calling Thompson purely a winger is hilarious if he stayed healthy two years ago we wouldnt even be talking about a playoff drought anymore since he easily would have put up 50/50 that season and we were only 1 point shirt of the playoffs with him at Center.If Faber is scoring 50+ points, Buffalo is adding significantly to Thompson. Faber’s primary function is defensive ability. Scoring 50+ along with that would make him a top 5 dman in the league. Those are never traded for wingers… Even the 40+ goal scoring kind.
Eriksson EK is the stud two way C. He had a down year offensively because he was injured and missed more than half of the yearWhere is this stud two way 2c you speak of?
So why has he been playing wing then?I still think calling Thompson purely a winger is hilarious if he stayed healthy two years ago we wouldnt even be talking about a playoff drought anymore since he easily would have put up 50/50 that season and we were only 1 point shirt of the playoffs with him at Center.
You really don’t want to know what it would cost to get Eriksson Ek.Eriksson Ek and Brodin for Peterka and Byram
+ something if needed
They wanted to see how Kulich was at centerSo why has he been playing wing then?
They wanted to see how Kulich was at center
So then you think Rossi is a 1c?Eriksson EK is the stud two way C. He had a down year offensively because he was injured and missed more than half of the year
Honestly, it was the defensive responsibilities. He needs to clean it up or have a defensively responsible winger step into the 1F position in their own zone.So why has he been playing wing then?
did I say anything about Rossi?? Or can't you see people are talking about EK? If you don't watch him, you shouldn't be talking and trying to bait anyone into an argument like you always do.So then you think Rossi is a 1c?
Let's go with '- something, because it is needed' instead. Eriksson Ek can be completely removed from any trade proposal.Eriksson Ek and Brodin for Peterka and Byram
+ something if needed
This is spot on. That said, I have no problem with Thompson at center if he's properly utilized. He's a unicorn with his size/skill combo. If Buffalo gets to a point where their depth at center pushes him to wing then thats a good problem to have. I don't think he's "strictly a wing" though, he's just not a very good defensive player, so I can see shuffling forwards around to account for that.Honestly, it was the defensive responsibilities. He needs to clean it up or have a defensively responsible winger step into the 1F position in their own zone.