Seravalli: - Buffalo may not have a choice but to trade Peterka | Page 24 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Seravalli: Buffalo may not have a choice but to trade Peterka

You don't know that. Peterka could sign a bridge contract. I wouldn't count on having same production numbers being a plus for Batherson considering he is 4 years older.
You think that makes it remotely comparable to Krebs for Brady? Drakes numbers have improved year over year, every single year and there is no guarantee JJP will do the same. Besides, 4 seasons ago, if not for a donkey play by a Sabres goalie, Drake would have easily surpassed 68 points at the same age. And if you think JJP is signing for less than 5, even on a bridge, idk what to tell you, but I think you'll be VERY disappointed
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: xVol
You think that makes it remotely comparable to Krebs for Brady? Drakes numbers have improved year over year, every single year and there is no guarantee JJP will do the same. Besides, 4 seasons ago, if not for a donkey play by a Sabres goalie, Drake would have easily surpassed 68 points at the same age. And if you think JJP is signing for less than 5, even on a bridge, idk what to tell you, but I think you'll be VERY disappointed

I have no idea what you are talking about in this rant. What does Krebs and Brady have to do with anything? I have no idea what you are talking about with Batherson being able to surpass 68 points 4 seasons ago because of one "donkey" play by a Sabres goalie????

I never said Peterka would get less than 5 million on a bridge deal. He would probably get anywhere from 5 to 6... that still isn't some huge difference between Bathersons 5.
 
I have no idea what you are talking about in this rant. What does Krebs and Brady have to do with anything? I have no idea what you are talking about with Batherson being able to surpass 68 points 4 seasons ago because of one "donkey" play by a Sabres goalie????

I never said Peterka would get less than 5 million on a bridge deal. He would probably get anywhere from 5 to 6... that still isn't some huge difference between Bathersons 5.
Maybe take a look back at who I was responding to and what they typed, in the message you responded to then, that should kinda go without saying if you're so confused. I literally quoted it in the message you obviously read & responded to. You don't remember your goalie getting suspended? Not exactly a common occurrence
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JackieDaytona
Batherson and JJP had the exact same amount of points and Drake will be making alot less than JJP over the next 2 years, so you're just being ridiculous, Drake and the Sabres 2nd are not that far off from a fair deal
Hes also 3 yrs older. Peterka > batherson
 
Maybe take a look back at who I was responding to and what they typed, in the message you responded to then, that should kinda go without saying if you're so confused. You don't remember your goalie getting suspended? Not exactly a common occurrence

Why.. I was responding to what you wrote.. I have no knowledge of your previous conversation with someone else.

I took your comment at face value and responded accordingly.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Barsky
Why.. I was responding to what you wrote.. I have no knowledge of your previous conversation with someone else.

I took your comment at face value and responded accordingly.
It's not your first time on here and I quoted what I was responding to in the message you responded to, come on man
 
It's not your first time on here and I quoted what I was responding to in the message you responded to, come on man

Stop being daft. My response was in connection of the Batherson + 2nd comment being a good deal. You know.. the comment that you "liked". It had nothing to do with another posters sarcastic comment about Krebs for Tkachuk.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Barsky
Stop being daft. My response was in connection of the Batherson + 2nd comment being a good deal. You know.. the comment that you "liked". It had nothing to do with another posters sarcastic comment about Krebs for Tkachuk.
I'm not the one being daft, you responded to me when I was responding to someone else and then pretended you had no idea what I was talking about. I also didn't say it was a "good deal" so I'm really wondering about your reading ability now or if you're intentionally just trying to be inflammatory
 
  • Like
Reactions: xVol
I’d offer a 1st, 2nd and 3rd and if Buffalo says no I’d put a 9.3M 1 year deal in front of JJP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky
I'm not the one being daft, you responded to me when I was responding to someone else and then pretended you had no idea what I was talking about. I also didn't say it was a "good deal" so I'm really wondering about your reading ability now or if you're intentionally just trying to be inflammatory

I didn't say that you said it was a good deal.. I said you "liked" the comment from the poster that did say it.

My reading ability is fine.

All I did was counter your point about Batherson is going to have such a better contract than JJP. I said you do not know that.
 
I didn't say that you said it was a good deal.. I said you "liked" the comment from the poster that did say it.

My reading ability is fine.

All I did was counter your point about Batherson is going to have such a better contract than JJP. I said you do not know that.
He will be making less money and you know that. Take care
 
If you say so haha
It would leave the Sabres with 14M to sign Quinn, McLeod, Byram, Levi and that’s simply to have a 21 man roster without any buffer. This is assuming Pegula spends to the cap.
 
It would leave the Sabres with 14M to sign Quinn, McLeod, Byram, Levi and that’s simply to have a 21 man roster without any buffer. This is assuming Pegula spends to the cap.

Byram is likely being traded. Quinn is likely getting a small bridge... he is probably the one most at risk of being offersheeted. Levi isn't getting anything substantial.. McLeod will have a modest in the 5's... and other trades are possible with moving out undesirable contracts.

It isn't an issue at all.
 
Byram is likely being traded. Quinn is likely getting a small bridge... he is probably the one most at risk of being offersheeted. Levi isn't getting anything substantial.. McLeod will have a modest in the 5's... and other trades are possible with moving out undesirable contracts.

It isn't an issue at all.
Okay. Will the owner spend to the upper limit ?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad