Brutal goal call in the Q

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

I think these officials are ready for prime time.

Click to read more...

 

[BTO]

Wait, they reviewed it? That’s brutal.

 

[The Crypto Guy]

Ok well first off do they have video review in that league? If not then it is what it is, ref probably was caught in a bad sightline. If they do then clearly the staff shouldn't be doing games.

 

[BLNY]

Ok well first off do they have video review in that league? If not than it is what it is. If they do than clearly the staff shouldnt be doing games.

They do have review for goals. My French isn't good enough to know if the announcers provided any context of review process.

 

[missionAvs]

Wait I need more context here. Was it reviewed? If so, did the goal stand?

 

[895]

It says it was called no goal after the second review.

So what are we mad about?

 

[Khelandros]

It says it was called no goal after the second review.

So what are we mad about?

Probably the fact that it even needed to go to second review.

 

[Mr Kot]

See, if you throw empty cans at refs, you CAN get your way

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

Wait I need more context here. Was it reviewed? If so, did the goal stand?

That they reviewed it and then needed a second review to realize how much of a dummy they are.

Though I should have added they eventually did get it right, that's on me

 

[Warden of the North]

NHL probably offered the refs jobs immediatly after the first review, then rescinded the offer once they got it right

 

[SEALBound]

Absolutely brutal and the team and fans were right to be pissed.

I also think there is some onus on the other team to go to the refs and be like, "Hey, that hit the post, it didn't go in," just from a pure sportsmanship POV. I was disappointed to see them cheering and celebrating when they clearly knew they got away with one.

 

[Voight]

See, if you throw empty cans at refs, you CAN get your way

It worked in the NCAA a month ago

 

[Tryblot]

Absolutely brutal and the team and fans were right to be pissed.

I also think there is some onus on the other team to go to the refs and be like, "Hey, that hit the post, it didn't go in," just from a pure sportsmanship POV. I was disappointed to see them cheering and celebrating when they clearly knew they got away with one.

What? This isn't house league playing for participation trophies. They want to win. It's not their job to make sure the refs do it correctly. Who gives a f*** about sportsmanship in this situation.

 

[SEALBound]

What? This isn't house league playing for participation trophies. They want to win. It's not their job to make sure the refs do it correctly. Who gives a f*** about sportsmanship in this situation.

Some of us believe in honesty and integrity, others don't I guess?

To each their own.

 

[missionAvs]

That they reviewed it and then needed a second review to realize how much of a dummy they are.

Though I should have added they eventually did get it right, that's on me

To the first point, are you saying that they reviewed it initially and still said it was a good goal and then they reviewed it again to call it a no goal? That's unbelievable if true and very lol-worthy.