CharasLazyWrister
Registered User
Half point per game on one of the weakest rosters in the league.
I don’t see the problem at all.
I don’t see the problem at all.
If it were up to you, when would you approach him about an extension?Can I expand on this?
I know you mentioned coach's preference, but that needs some detail.
Monty is a lame duck coach who enters the year without an extension. When was the last time the Bruins had that?
He needs wins, especially in the playoffs.
Damn straight coach's preference will play a big role. I could argue the biggest role.
Check his scoring at even strength. His pts came on the pp. Which of Marchand, Pasta, Lindholm, Zacha do you see him displacing?Half point per game on one of the weakest rosters in the league.
I don’t see the problem at all.
Nope.If it were up to you, when would you approach him about an extension?
I think we're all just happy to have some think to5 pages in 21 hours.
You’d think the bruins just gave him a 3x$5m contract. Not a PTO
I think we're all just happy to have some think toarguetalk about that isn't Sway's extension lol
I don't, I expect him to push Lysell and bring a veteran voice to camp. At worst he stays and helps Providence, best he has something left. 18-15-33 in middle six isn't a reach, question becomes is Lysell better or a career AHLer.that's his analytics from the past 3 seasons. Yes, all those Hawks teams have been very bad but I just think it's a bad bet to expect a 34 year old Johnson to suddenly turn into a player we haven't seen him be in like 4-5 years.
Well where is he playing in the middle 6? He's both undersized and has been terrible defensively in recent years, so is that a guy you're comfortable playing with Poitras?I don't, I expect him to push Lysell and bring a veteran voice to camp. At worst he stays and helps Providence, best he has something left. 18-15-33 in middle six isn't a reach, question becomes is Lysell better or a career AHLer.
that's his analytics from the past 3 seasons. Yes, all those Hawks teams have been very bad but I just think it's a bad bet to expect a 34 year old Johnson to suddenly turn into a player we haven't seen him be in like 4-5 years.
He ha 29 goals 6 years ago, sound defensively ummmGotta love this place sometimes…
Last year we bring in a guy on a PTO who had 22 points the previous year and some welcome him with open arms….
This year we bring in a guy who had almost as many goals -17 - As that guy had points the previous year and it’s somehow a bad move?
Furthermore, the guy who came here last year and was lauded as a huge success with 36 points only had 5 more points than the guy they’re bringing in this year.
Lol
I know points aren’t everything but brining in a veteran who has scored 29 goals twice and is sound defensively for FREE is a no brainer.
If he can play and help the team great!
If not, no harm done, and maybe he pushes a young kid to work a little harder or to focus more on something they need to improve on, or may even teach them something that helps them stick.
No lose situation.
5 pages in 21 hours.
You’d think the bruins just gave him a 3x$5m contract. Not a PTO
He ha 29 goals 6 years ago, sound defensively ummm
Check his scoring at even strength. His pts came on the pp. Which of Marchand, Pasta, Lindholm, Zacha do you see him displacing?
Doubtful he makes the team, if so an extra fourth liner at best
Huh? At least December?It shows how much faith management has in the providence players. I agree with them good move much better than hoping a providence player is gonna make an impact. With poitras not around until at least December they are paper thin up front
I
I stand corrected.
Posting from the car and was going on memories from his TB days.
Also I’m not comparing him to the much younger Heinen….just comparing people’s attitudes about the situation.
Many of us were insulted for calling his PTO bad or unnecessary based on his abysmal 22/23 season but now many are against Johnson when his production numbers were better seems kind of rash.
It’s a long season and injuries happen, and people don’t produce as expected .
This is a no risk move, IMO.
He might be washed but 17 goals is still 17 goals.
I don't put a ton of stock in analytics for players on really bad teams. We've seen lots of players go from "terrible" (based on their cards) to good after switching from a terrible team to a good one. I would expect most players on Chicago to look bad defensively on paper."sound defensively"
View attachment 904441
Again, I really can't get worked up about a PTO. But this dude is WASHED washed.
Completely different scenario then bringing in a 27 year old Heinen, who was coming off a bad finishing year but still had decent underlying stats with a recent history of being a plus defender.