Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Brooks: Tampa after Shattenkirk

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember there was some bad blood when Callahan left, I'm not so sure management wants him back.
 
nyr2k2 said:
Cally was my favorite forward during that era. I don't want him back. He can **** off. I know it's business but **** off. I don't think he'd want to come back, either.
Click to expand...

Cally's got one more year after this one. Shattenkirk has two. He's not the glue holding our defense together and he's not been a huge offensive threat either. We're not going anywhere with Cally either but we'd be out from under in one year instead of two. The team gets younger faster and picks up other assets. Works for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buchnevich89
eco's bones said:
Cally's got one more year after this one. Shattenkirk has two. He's not the glue holding our defense together and he's not been a huge offensive threat either. We're not going anywhere with Cally either but we'd be out from under in one year instead of two. The team gets younger faster and picks up other assets. Works for me.
Click to expand...
It makes plenty of sense from a hockey move perspective. I just don't want Callahan on my team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZiGOODejad and eco's bones
DanielBrassard said:
What if it's a different RHD defenseman they are scouting, one not named Shattenkirk or ADA.
Click to expand...
9e9.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: LORDE, ZuccsFluffierFluffer, ZiGOODejad and 2 others
Trxjw said:
It'd have to be a pretty sweet deal for something like that to happen. Especially if we're retaining on Shattenkirk.
Click to expand...

I mean a guaranteed #1 this year, a chance for another next year and at worst a #2 then Raddysh who is having a great rookie year in the AHL as a 20 y/o is a good return.

@bobbop mentioned in his update this morning that the Rangers were looking to potentially move someone that hasn't really been discussed in some rumors. Shattenkirk really hasnt been talked about. Also an "unconventional" move and wanting to to save some space for a move.

Edit: oh and we need their 7th in 2020 since the Rangers are trying to monopolize all the picks in that round in that year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LORDE and jt80
nyr2k2 said:
It makes plenty of sense from a hockey move perspective. I just don't want Callahan on my team.
Click to expand...

Overall he was a good Ranger. I don't blame players for not giving a discount. That's pretty much why we moved him. He couldn't live up to his new contract and I don't forsee us giving him another. Anyway worse comes to worse we can buy him out but generally he's always been a team oriented kind of player. I expect the effort will be there but probably not a lot of points.
 
Shattenkirk at 50% retained. Remove the condition from this year’s pick, and make it a guaranteed 1st. Also, we’ll take year’s 2nd rounder, and maybe a Tammela or a Volkov if they value him highly. Personally, I would dump Shattenkirk at 50% retained for a 1st rounder and that’s it. But I doubt it happens.
 
UAGoalieGuy said:
I mean a guaranteed #1 this year, a chance for another next year and at worst a #2 then Raddysh who is having a great rookie year in the AHL as a 20 y/o is a good return.

@bobbop mentioned in his update this morning that the Rangers were looking to potentially move someone that hasn't really been discussed in some rumors. Shattenkirk really hasnt been talked about. Also an "unconventional" move and wanting to to save some space for a move.

Edit: oh and we need their 7th in 2020 since the Rangers are trying to monopolize all the picks in that round in that year.
Click to expand...

That's a package I'd do. That being said, I think McQuaid might be a guy they're more interested in.
 
Look this is rabid speculation by Brooks and more than likely he’s being the mouthpiece again because it makes less than ZERO sense.

But Cally coming back for a yr isn’t the worse thing ever.

That being said, if we are helping them, AGAIN I want a damn good prospect NOT conditions of a pick we may already own! Not to mention that they can’t trade their 1 or 2 because of that condition.

They have to give us someONE really good to get those conditions removed
 
Tawnos said:
The bad blood is entirely in the minds of a bunch of deluded fans.
Click to expand...

Yeah I don’t get that. When there were rumors last summer, He even said that he’d welcome a trade and would feel comfortable in the organization, if he came back to the Rangers. He doesn’t want to leave a contender but if he has no choice, nothing he can do.
 
Shatty @50% for Cal Foote and a first round pick (which becomes a 2020 pick if we get their 2019 pick as a result of hitting the McDonagh trade condition). And their 2020 7th rounder because we collect those. If they fail to win the Cup this year, they don't need to send us their second rounder to complete the McDonagh trade.

So if they fail to win the Cup, it's Shatty @50% and a second rounder for a first and Foote; if they do wi the Cup, then Shatty @50% for Foote+#1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom