Nharris31
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2013
- 4,433
- 225
Deal kind of concerned with Klefbom injuries though.What about deal 1for1 with Oilers? Klefbom for Brodin.
Deal kind of concerned with Klefbom injuries though.What about deal 1for1 with Oilers? Klefbom for Brodin.
I think Brodin, Coyle and Ennis for O'Reilly and McCabe is the closest we've come on that one.O’Reilly for the pair?
Well, we would then have the highest scoring D corps in the league...
Of course the GA's against might get ugly.
It's not an insulting offer, but what would Gardiner cost to sign?
One reason among many that i treasure Brodin is that he can play both sides. Gives a lot of flexibility, should a trade that can't be refused for Spurge/ Dumba be offered
Hey 57special. We had some great conversations during the off-season and leading up to the expansion draft about Brodin and the Bruins.
Alot has happened since then, but I've always really like Brodin. The two teams I don't think match up that well, but if you had to deal with just the B's, would kind of package would you be looking for? Either Brodin or Brodin+Coyle.
Hey 57special. We had some great conversations during the off-season and leading up to the expansion draft about Brodin and the Bruins.
Alot has happened since then, but I've always really like Brodin. The two teams I don't think match up that well, but if you had to deal with just the B's, would kind of package would you be looking for? Either Brodin or Brodin+Coyle.
Not the guy you were asking for, but I'm a Wild and Bruins fan. I could see a deal based around Heinen+2nd for Brodin or Heinen+Frederic+small add for Brodin+Coyle
Assuming that EK is gone, Brodin would be perfect to babysit Chabot, who might end up being a wonderful Dman. Not a big fan of trading a 24yo dman who can play both sides, though. Especially when the rear LHD situation is all of a sudden thin, with Scandella traded and Suter seriously injured.I'd love to see Brodin in Ottawa if the Sens don't win the lottery.
I am not on the trade Brodin train, at all, unless he is packaged for something really special, or something potentially special. Suter's return to health is not a sure thing, and I think it's madness to consider trading Brodin till we know that Suter is back, and fully healthy.
I like Heinen in the few times I've seen him, but he isn't special, to me. Debrusk also looks good...but I think that they are more of the same of what we have. LW is not really a position of need.
I would consider trading one of Coyle or Nino, though I think their value is low right now, so again I think it's dumb to sell low on them.
If i'm trading Brodin and Coyle, it would be for a high end player or very high pick, and BOS doesn't have that to offer.
If I had to ball park value Brodin it would be Debrusk+ Frederic for Brodin. Still don't think it would be smart for the Wild. Anointing Nick Seeler as your #1 LHD to start next season is not wise. Podgornik obviously has a different take on things..
BTW, I was pretty impressed by that Dman with too many consonants. Miller, too. It's amazing how the B's have rebounded from 2-3 years ago...the depth is impressive.I don’t think either of you are necessarily wrong. I would think Boston would entertain Heinen with the emergence of Donato. But Brodin also knocks Gryz from the lineup which is not ideal. Again, I don’t think it’s a great match, but interesting to see your perspective.
Ewww. No. Wouldn’t do Brodin straight up let alone add.Brodin + something for Byfuglien
BTW, I was pretty impressed by that Dman with too many consonants. Miller, too. It's amazing how the B's have rebounded from 2-3 years ago...the depth is impressive.
I think Brodin, Coyle and Ennis for O'Reilly and McCabe is the closest we've come on that one.
No, that isn't a good move. RNH is more expensive than Brodin, and is not a #1C, and I would argue a MOR #2C, at best. He is also not anywhere near any of our present C's when it comes to physicality, and, while a good skater, is nothing special. Don't see him getting anything but beaten up by teams like WPG. I would be appalled if the Wild made that deal.Brodin for RNH sounds like a good move for us. Not sure what Oilers fans think about it though.
BUFF is amazing, but MN can't do that.Brodin + something for Byfuglien
I think your analysis of RNH is spot on. That's still probably a fair deal for Brodin.No, that isn't a good move. RNH is more expensive than Brodin, and is not a #1C, and I would argue a MOR #2C, at best. He is also not anywhere near any of our present C's when it comes to physicality, and, while a good skater, is nothing special. Don't see him getting anything but beaten up by teams like WPG. I would be appalled if the Wild made that deal.
Admittedly, it might make less sense now that Buffalo's drawn 1st overall. The idea was kind of predicated on the Sabres moving O'Reilly, and I get the feeling that everyone is going to cool on that idea over the weeks leading up to the draft.I wouldn't make that trade from Buffalo's side. I like Brodin and all, but I don't see him as ever being anything but a solid top 4 player. And this creates a hole in Buffalo's top 6 that nobody can replace anytime soon. On top of it, Buffalo takes yet another bad contract to make the trade? I'd be a hard no on this idea. But then again, I'd be more willing to trade Reinhart in a package for that type of deal so what do I know?
Brodin for RNH sounds like a good move for us. Not sure what Oilers fans think about it though.
Turning centers into wingers might be a reason why you didn't make the playoffs.If you’d proposed that last summer it might have been well received, but RNH was lights out with McDavid and they really complemented each other well.
RNH is probably not available for Brodin. Hindsight being 20/20 and the RNH/Dumba rumblings from last year don’t look so bad for us now...