strattonius
Registered User
No one, not even the person you are responding to, said he's been good or that they were satisfied with his play offensively. The person you are responding to only said that they were happy with Peteys defensive play. Don't have to strawman a "Petey has been great" to make a both sides argument here. Not bad isn't the same as good or satisfied.
The two actual sides seem to be split on why Pettersson has struggled, not whether he has. One side, the trade him even if we lose the trade side, believes that its a character flaw and it won't therefore improve or that he will never be consistently at a level that justifies his contract. The other side believes that it is better to keep him, either because the cause is fixable or not largely due to fixed character flaws or because we wouldn't be better from making such a move.
This news from the agent absolutely helps the latter side make their case that he's had an external cause limiting him. However, it remains curious why the team doesn't seem interested in defending him or seconding this position. It wouldn't be hard for them to say hey he dealt with something, couldn't go as hard coming in, we are working with him etc etc. Yet they deny he was even hurt. To me theres probably some disagreement with how EP40 handled this either by not communicating with the team or disagreeing with their plan or something. Theres no reason to not back him up especially with Miller no longer there to throw a hissy fit if they didn't pick his side.
I'm firmly on the keep Petey, he was the 21st highest contract by cap percent at time of signing when he signed this deal, and the cap is only going up and he's still young and insanely talented. The upside is something you don't get back in any trade. We already traded Miller for a lot less than his play is worth, why do it again? Ive also fully believed hes been hurt, he went from leading the league in points and dominating to disappearing so quickly last season and has been starkly slower since. But as I said, there's more to this than just that, since the team doesn't want to back him up for some reason here. Probably both sides (not including certain extreme posters) are correct to some degree.
I'm not strawmanning anything. So many flippant uses of that word around here it's like a weird back pocket Ace people think they have.
I replied to 'he hasn't been playing bad' and maybe I didn't understand the rhetoric? Either way I'm not trying to bury anyone I'm just in the 'very little patience for ep40' group.