Being 13th as of today in defensemen scoring is enough, by the time his contract ends he will be 9th.Congrats to Burns. Hell of a player but not Hall of Fame worthy IMO. That said, it has become the Hall of Very Good so he'll get in eventually.
Being 13th as of today in defensemen scoring is enough, by the time his contract ends he will be 9th.Congrats to Burns. Hell of a player but not Hall of Fame worthy IMO. That said, it has become the Hall of Very Good so he'll get in eventually.
no its not. terrible logic.
Jamie Benn won an Art Ross trophy, that alone is enough to get into the Hall of fame. He's going to surpass 1000 career points before it's all said and done. On top of that he's big, strong, handsome and plays hockey the right way. And for over 3 years Benn was leading the NHL in points as a feared powerforward: NHL Stats
So his 3 worst years offensively was being forward and that is supposed to some how change his hall of fame status?Why won't anyone call out the fact that about 100 of the points was him playing forward? I mean i love the player one of my favorites of all time, but let's be honest here, he didnt get 900 points as a defender.
Didn't say it does, just saying he didn't get 900 points as a defender.So his 3 worst years offensively was being forward and that is supposed to some how change his hall of fame status?
Don't see why he wouldn't make the HoF. Peaked very high and was elite for a long time. Also has some incredible longevity playing later in his career. Unique player in that he played at forward as well. Not sure what they case against him would be.
What im saying is that this is not true: Bei Facebook anmeldenSo his 3 worst years offensively was being forward and that is supposed to some how change his hall of fame status?