... is awesome, just off to a bit of a slow start, he'd do it though!Jason Robertson.
What upward trajectory?It was very good evidence that your statement of him playing almost every game for the last 6 years was so laughably false. 34 points over 3 seasons, while not adjusting for their ages and Brady's upward trajectory is not "significant", sorry, especially when they score goals at the exact same pace over their careers, then it's just disingenuous stat manipulation. My initial point is Brady is now and will prove to be more and more so as their careers progress, more durable and anyone who knows hockey knows the most important ability is availability. We both agree Matt is better, but you don't understand what Matt's game will do to his body long term vs Brady, who again, could dummy Matt, which makes GM's drool. I made these same predictions about how Weber's offer sheet contract destroyed his value and with his game he'd be long retired b4 it was done, and I met with the same short sighted myopic arguments. Done now, take care
Cause every team and every fanbase wants him and for good reason. Also, it's HFBoards, lol, you new here? (I know you're not)
Follow up.Timothy Liljegren and nic Robertson seem to be available
Never said he was and have said multiple times Matthew is better, great reading comprehension. Bearing you mean maybe? And idk, you tell me, you're the one bringing it up, though I did mention they both made their teams in their first camps, which just speaks to their similarities, but that was in a long list of other stuff that showed how similar they were, so you focusing on that is a bit weirdWhat the hell does what they did at 19 have a single barring on who they are now? lol.
There’s one person in here who thinks Brady is more valuable.
And it’s you.
Wait… you mean like the same sample size you’re using to say Woll > Swayman
Dude just give it up lol
What upward trajectory?
He had 10 less points in 23-24 than 22-23, and outside of the fact that his on ice shooting% is at like 20 rn, he is at a worse level than the 2 years previous in:
individual categories EV: producing worse in virtually every aspect
-less assists
-less goals
-less shots
-less expected goals
-more giveaways
-less takeaways
-less hits (I know you love this)
-worse penalty differential
heck he's even getting cooked in the faceoff dot worse
View attachment 924447
View attachment 924448
On ice categories EV:
View attachment 924449View attachment 924450
The only "improvement" has been from shooting luck. (hint, having 40% of a teams shots go in on the power play is not sustainable)
Which of the stats I mentioned do you consider "advanced stats"Ah, so you're one of those fans that thinks advanced stats mean everything huh.
Which of the stats I mentioned do you consider "advanced stats"
I mentioned 9 individual metrics where he has regressed EV, which of them do you view as "advanced":
here they are
Goals
Assists
Shots
Giveaways
Takeaways
Hits
Faceoffs
Penalty differential
Expected Goals.
Or is the advanced part that I took a look at when both teams had the same amount of people on the ice?
Or are the spooky advanced stats "how often does his team generate a shot when he's on the ice"?
God I love when people say Corsi and Fenwick are advanced stats when it's literally just a count of shot attempts.
No, my argument is that there is no upward trajectory to suggest he's approaching his brother. Most guys stagnate around their mid 20s.Having more shot attempts in itself doesn't really mean that much. Or obviously a guy is going to have more shot attempts against when he's playing against better players. There are a lot of factors that could make those fancy stat numbers go up or down. A lot of it has to do with the quality of the linemates and team in general and situational factors.
So your argument is that Brady is actually becoming a slightly worse hockey player as he gains more experience?
Did you also predict Lucic and Backes would both destroy their bodies and become pretty useless?It was very good evidence that your statement of him playing almost every game for the last 6 years was so laughably false. 34 points over 3 seasons, while not adjusting for their ages and Brady's upward trajectory is not "significant", sorry, especially when they score goals at the exact same pace over their careers, then it's just disingenuous stat manipulation. My initial point is Brady is now and will prove to be more and more so as their careers progress, more durable and anyone who knows hockey knows the most important ability is availability. We both agree Matt is better, but you don't understand what Matt's game will do to his body long term vs Brady, who again, could dummy Matt, which makes GM's drool. I made these same predictions about how Weber's offer sheet contract destroyed his value and with his game he'd be long retired b4 it was done, and I met with the same short sighted myopic arguments. Done now, take care
Cause every team and every fanbase wants him and for good reason. Also, it's HFBoards, lol, you new here? (I know you're not)
What did both Matthew and Brady Tkachuck do when they were 24?Never said he was and have said multiple times Matthew is better, great reading comprehension. Bearing you mean maybe? And idk, you tell me, you're the one bringing it up, though I did mention they both made their teams in their first camps, which just speaks to their similarities, but that was in a long list of other stuff that showed how similar they were, so you focusing on that is a bit weird
There has not been a single season where Woll has been better than Swayman. Including the AHL lol.Uh no. You seriously think I am saying this based off of 3 playoff games? He's been high end for many years going back to his last year with the Marlies.
There has not been a single season where Woll has been better than Swayman. Including the AHL lol.
So you’re basing it off of…. Nothing?
What the hell do YOU base it off of?What do you base this off of? Just reading statlines basically?