Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,323
- 12,761
Proposal: Brady Tkachuk to New York Rangers
- Thread starter Agent Zuuuub
- Start date
Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,351
- 13,661
lol, poster isn’t a Sens insider at all, farthest thing from it, you made that up.
Last edited:
Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 57,019
- 34,786
Wtf are you talking about??? Lol,
Can’t really see the Rangers being interested in this. Aside from becoming even more top-heavy, giving up two wingers, one of whom is finally looking like he will live up to his 1st overall pick level, they aren’t likely to want to tie up another $9M long term in one player on the left wing when they have Panarin and Kreider already there.
noncents
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2022
- 1,678
- 2,088
replace laf with kreider and i think we have something
Probably more replace Kakko with Zib and Tkachuk with Stutzle. Can’t see the Rangers entertaining rearranging the wingers. They need a C, not more expensive wings.
noncents
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2022
- 1,678
- 2,088
Zib isn't moving, with an NMC, and certainly isn't moving to return to ottawa.
they don't need a C, they need a LHD. Chabot pinto for kreider lindgren is the trade
Kocur Dill
picklicious
- Feb 7, 2010
- 3,182
- 1,680
Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
The issue here is that Rangers fans are talking up Lafreniere as being as good as Tkachuk without the PP1 time (we have a set PP1, so Brady would be out of luck also). Even if you concede Tkachuk is better, the difference isn’t Kakko, who is turning into a top six winger this season.
So definitely not.
So definitely not.
Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 9,048
- 4,381
Insider? That’s a licentious use of that word.
I’m sure this will launch a boat load of stupid posts though. Perhaps that was the intent?
frightenedinmatenum2
Registered User
Dionysus
Registered User
Why lie to make your proposal sound like more than something you just made up? Bad look.
Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,323
- 12,761
Just as likely as the original. Neither is realistic. I’d argue the Rangers need both a top 6 C and a top 4 LD. Ottawa doesn’t have those they’d be willing to trade.
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Dionysus
Registered User
Not really. Nobody with any known connections or sources on hfsens has made any such claims.
Xspyrit
DJ Dorion
Uh I would do the proposal in the OP in a heart beat and I wouldn't do Laf for Tkachuk 1 for 1 if I was the Rangers but Stutzle is off limits and the only Rangers player valuable enough to have a conversation for him is Adam Fox.
Crazy how underrated Stutzle is. He is still 22 y/o and has the 22nd highest PPG in the NHL since 2022-23 when he was 20 y/o, and where he was already the offensive engine of the team. He is trailing players like Crosby and Eichel...
I would do it in a heart beat, doubt the Rangers would consider though
Last edited:
Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,351
- 13,661
Stutzle was being used as an example, not a real proposal. And Fox is worth more than Stutzle. Doesn’t mean he isn’t valuable, though.
Lindgren isn’t a great top-2/4 LD. He’s fine as a 6, but the idea would be to upgrade him if he’s in the top 4.
It’s just a bad example, because it completely goes contrary to what the Sens would be trying to do here.
The Rangers are in their window now and it might not be for much longer. The Sens are rebuilding and finding out they’re not quite as close as they hoped to be, and finally dawning on everyone that Brady isn’t the leader they hoped would be in his prime for the window. So to change team culture they’d need to trade him away and make the younger star center their new captain.
Suggesting that the deal could be massaged so that the Sens keep the guy they’re trying to part with and move the years-younger guy they’re trying to promote to leader of their not-imminent compete window … is to completely ignore every single thing about what this proposal would be trying to accomplish.
The Rangers are in their window now and it might not be for much longer. The Sens are rebuilding and finding out they’re not quite as close as they hoped to be, and finally dawning on everyone that Brady isn’t the leader they hoped would be in his prime for the window. So to change team culture they’d need to trade him away and make the younger star center their new captain.
Suggesting that the deal could be massaged so that the Sens keep the guy they’re trying to part with and move the years-younger guy they’re trying to promote to leader of their not-imminent compete window … is to completely ignore every single thing about what this proposal would be trying to accomplish.
leetch99
Leetch66 Joined 2007
Lafreniere and a slight add for BT . Seems like a fair deal for both clubs . At some point BT will want out and best to trade before it comes to that I think. Sens get a skilled kind of local guy with lots of upside and Rangers get a truculent player they desperately need . Each would likely then become leaders of their new clubs . I can see it helping both clubs ....if Sens get the right +/add in the deal . Hopefully they can get it ironed out .so it helps both teams .
Xspyrit
DJ Dorion
Awful, like god awful
Kreider turns 34 and only 2 years left after the season. Lindgren don't have any value left
Pinto just turned 24 y/o but missed 1.5 years of development with an injury and a suspension.
When healthy, Chabot is a puck possession monster and play driver who is elite in transition. I do want to see him somewhere else though (for his own sake) but not with this trade
Another really bad deal for Ottawa, as much as they'd need to add a Frederic
Batherson is the 2nd best offensive player on the team and makes less than 5 M$
Debatable. Stutzle is younger, cheaper, 1st line 2-way C and has more term left. Age and contracts are very big factors in players value.
Where do I sign?
I mean Tkachuk is a first line power forward but Laf is special and fits more what the Sens need
I want to watch Lafreniere and Stutzle together for 10+ years
Lafreniere - Stutzle - Batherson, what a line that would be.
