Winnipeg wants a comparable LD for Trouba. If Winnipeg calls this June before the expansion draft offering Trouba straight up for Skjei,do you make the trade if you are Gorton? Skjei is no longer an unknown quantity with a cup of coffee of NHL experience like he was in the fall.
The thing Skjei really needs to work on is kinda the opposite of what Kreider had to. He needs to play the game at a pace where he can think and pass. He knows he's a tremendous skater and it bails him out of a lot of situations, but then he'll enter the offensive zone, by himself, with the puck, and have no idea what to do with it. he comes across as a very dumb player but I'm not sure if he just lacks the vision i'd hoped he'd have, or he just doesn't know at what speed he needs to play the game.
Don't see how anyone can really call him dumb with some off the passes hes made in the offensive zone this year. Put those John Moore comps to rest real quick.
The vision is there. Dumping pucks in deep when you're by yourself isn't necessarily a low IQ play, especially when it seems like a player on this team does it after spending a minute+ skating around in their own end and need a change.
I'd hesitate to discredit that comparison so quick.
Skjei is in his 22-23 year old season right now. That was 2012-2013 for Moore. Lockout shortened year. Traded to NYR mid-season.
5v5 via Corsica:
TOI:
Skjei: 790 [14.6 per game]
Moore: 366 [12.2 per game]
G/60
Skjei: 0.15
Moore: 0.16
A160
Skjei: 0.68
Moore: 0.66
A260 [included for integrity, but **** A2s]
Skjei: 0.61
Moore: 0.33
relSA%
Skjei: 1.52
Moore: 0.86
relxGF%
Skjei: -1.42
Moore: 2.6
relGF%:
Skjei: 2.27
Moore: 9.32
Individual attempts per 60:
Skjei: 8.97
Moore: 10.18
So, in my defense, this isn't the most ridiculous comparison.
And tbf, John Moore was pretty good as a Ranger. Really dropped off when we traded him to ARI. Never really progressed from his 12/13 season.
He was great when he first came over that lockout shortened year but he really plateau'd in the 13-14 season and going forward. He was pretty much a serviceable 3rd pairing dman which was very disappointing based on what we had seen from him in that stretch after he got dealt here.
He was great when he first came over that lockout shortened year but he really plateau'd in the 13-14 season and going forward. He was pretty much a serviceable 3rd pairing dman which was very disappointing based on what we had seen from him in that stretch after he got dealt here.
Precisely.
I've never gone from liking a player to hating them as fast as J. Moore.
It's not a ridiculous comparison, but I'd still say Skjei is a much more complete player, and someone I'd take 10 times out of 10 over Moore.
He looked like the Diet McDonagh at first, and he tailed off hard after that.
Sure, but also....
Is exactly what I said about Skjei. I asked will he be more of a McDonagh or more of a John Moore? And thus, the comparison narrative was born.
Hey I said the comparison wasn't ridiculous haha, he could very well end up on that side of the scale, I just don't see it happening, I already think Skjei is a better player than Moore, a much better passer, hell he even has more assists in 54 games than Moore has had season high point totals.
From a profile standpoint, I can understand the Moore and Skjei comparisons.
But when you watch them play, its easy to see that its a not really an accurate one. Skjei has made a ton of plays in the offensive zone that Moore just doesn't make. He's been better (or at least more willing/confident) at rushing the puck up the ice and does a better job at getting his shot on net, even if he lacks the velocity that Moore has.
He isn't flawless and there are mistakes that he definitely needs to iron out in order to reach the lofty #2 ceiling that some see, but even if you want to throw out the idea that Skjei and Moore had similar ceilings at the same stage of their careers (now that is fair IMO), Skjei is already closer to reaching it than Moore has ever been.
A2 schmay2, Skjei has already produced more this year than Moore has in any professional season. As long as he stays healthy, that gap is only going to continue to grow. I agree that playing on a strong offensive team will inflate your numbers some, but I don't believe that it's really that big of an issue (See: G has 10 points and Staal has 7 points.)
So we are 'eye-testing' Brady Skjei this year to your memories of John Moore in 2013?
Or, are you comparing Brady Skjei this year, to John Moore this year, where he plays on a Devils team whose entire system is based around suppressing offense for and against? Have you watched enough Devils game to make this comparison of the eye-test?
Or perhaps before declaring anything of substance either way, which you'll notice I have not done, is that maybe we agree that their underlying numbers, and the way they both played at age 22 are similar, and perhaps the book has yet to be written on whether Brady Skjei will definitively have a better NHL career than John Moore has.
I am not comfortable making that declaration just yet.
Brady Skjei was never billed as an offensive d-man. If I recall correctly, we drafted him as a defensive d who was a tremendous skater with the hope that he could be a 2-way d-man. Offensive upside was gravy.
In my opinion, he's pretty much been as advertised. Better defensively than offensively, and he can skate. I was never sure where the OFD thing came from.
Brady Skjei was never billed as an offensive d-man. If I recall correctly, we drafted him as a defensive d who was a tremendous skater with the hope that he could be a 2-way d-man. Offensive upside was gravy.
In my opinion, he's pretty much been as advertised. Better defensively than offensively, and he can skate. I was never sure where the OFD thing came from.
I believe he was always billed as a 2 way defenseman since he was drafted.
edit - http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1458134-ny-rangers-everything-you-need-to-know-about-brady-skjei here an an article with a few scouting reports of him 4 years ago.