Brad Treliving is doing a great job.

Patches with another 2 picks and Domi with another goal.a depth game

Tell me again about how the depth isn't doing much.

Because while Nylander and Marner did score this was a depth game

I don't look at single games, I suggest you don't either.. team is still carried by the top players, like usual.
 
Anyone still arguing this team isn't different, this isn't our best D, the coach isn't better, the depth isn't better, is a completely clueless poster. Like come the eff on, we've never seen anything approaching this type of game. Full credit to the GM, love it.
The #1 sign of a person falling into a cult is if they've fallen into a cult before.

Of course Keefe and Dubas idiots slurp the same shit.
 
I think in the near future it will look insane Keefe had 5 years here. I think he's out in NJ in 3. He drastically under performed even with some injuries. Crazy he was kept around for so long.

Nice to have a gm and coach that understand playoff hockey.
Especially after the Habs collapse. At that point they could have moved anyone since none of them had NMC kick in yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClarkSittler
who gives a f***

this is an elite shutdown defenceman. points are a bonus

...although he actually moves the puck up the ice very well, so maybe we'll get a couple of bonus assists and a greasy bonus goal...

GLG
This whole puck moving shit is just gas lighting. There are very few NHL defensemen who can't move the puck if the forwards are helping out like they should.
 
According to the two Dubas fans left here, this future Hall of Fame player, too, is wrong.
IMG_0926.gif
 
Not sure what you're even trying to say. He didn't fail to get a Muzzin. He literally got him, and a lot of other players that were far from "filler". There were no cohesion or oil issues.

That's recency bias talking.

Tanev is a 20 point pace defender. Muzzin is a 35 point pace defender.

They both did that. Muzzin actually played more minutes, and did it with Holl, not McCabe. While providing better offense and PKing. We can appreciate Tanev and what he's done in year 1 without diminishing what past players brought.

I realize Tanev had 2 points in game 1, including a goal and that's fantastic

But offense is NOT why he's on this team.

He's on this team for defense and he's damn good at it.

Any offense he does provide is a bonus.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad