Proposal: BOS/VGK Cap Trade

Clint Eastwood

Eff the Habs
Nov 11, 2018
5,734
10,763
Chili's
Double check the trade list and hope the Bruins aren't on it lol

To Bruins:

Dadonov
2023 1st
2022 2nd
2022 NYR 3rd
2023 3rd

To VGK:

Something to make the cap work


The Bruins would have no problem helping out the Golden Knights with some of their cap issues. Just have to pay a little price ;):naughty:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LuckyBoeser

BlueBaron

Registered User
May 29, 2006
15,752
6,350
Sarnia, On
This is a confusing situation. My understanding is they are collecting cap penalties daily.

Seems to me this puts them at a bargaining disadvantage. Squeeze everything you can out of them.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,692
35,322
40N 83W (approx)
Double check the trade list and hope the Bruins aren't on it lol

To Bruins:

Dadonov
2023 1st
2022 2nd
2022 NYR 3rd
2023 3rd

To VGK:

Something to make the cap work


The Bruins would have no problem helping out the Golden Knights with some of their cap issues. Just have to pay a little price ;):naughty:
The Knights' 2023 1st isn't free to be moved because if their 2022 pick lands in the top-10, the 2023 pick goes to Buffalo.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,090
10,804
Can't see Vegas paying that price (different 1st) even if they shot themselves in the foot here, accidentally or knowingly.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,293
21,176
Bruins don't have the cap space to take on Dadonov without sending cap back. Vegas needs to shed Dadonov's cap hit without taking cap back. There's no way for this trade to work.

This is a confusing situation. My understanding is they are collecting cap penalties daily.

Seems to me this puts them at a bargaining disadvantage. Squeeze everything you can out of them.
Vegas is not incurring any cap penalties. They are currently cap compliant. The issue is that they need about 4.8 mil in cap space to activate Martinez off LTIR. Trading Dadonov without taking cap back, or by taking only players back who are on LTIR, gives them that cap space.
 

BlueBaron

Registered User
May 29, 2006
15,752
6,350
Sarnia, On
Bruins don't have the cap space to take on Dadonov without sending cap back. Vegas needs to shed Dadonov's cap hit without taking cap back. There's no way for this trade to work.


Vegas is not incurring any cap penalties. They are currently cap compliant. The issue is that they need about 4.8 mil in cap space to activate Martinez off LTIR. Trading Dadonov without taking cap back, or by taking only players back who are on LTIR, gives them that cap space.
Yeah that's an issue. I'm pretty sure it's also an issue keeping healthy people from playing. There is a timer ticking.
 

OTC

Registered User
Jul 11, 2018
428
119
You do realize any team that "acquires" Dadonov cannot play him for until next season right?
While there is a specific deadline for trades, teams can still acquire players from other clubs after March 21. The caveat is that any player traded after the March 21 deadline is not eligible to be placed on a team's postseason roster. They can play the rest of the regular season with their new squad, however.
 

smytty

Registered User
Aug 1, 2015
351
700
I think you're wrong. Friedman and Marek addressed this on their latest podcast. They are ineligible to play regular season as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teddygmr

Daz28

Registered User
Nov 1, 2010
12,761
2,217
Yeah that's an issue. I'm pretty sure it's also an issue keeping healthy people from playing. There is a timer ticking.
It looks like Stone won't be able to come off LTIR even if healthy AFTER a Dady trade. They'd have to waive him, and hope someone takes him. What if no one takes him? Then what? This is why the whole LTIR nonsense thing needs to be handled.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,692
35,322
40N 83W (approx)
It looks like Stone won't be able to come off LTIR even if healthy AFTER a Dady trade. They'd have to waive him, and hope someone takes him. What if no one takes him? Then what? This is why the whole LTIR nonsense thing needs to be handled.
Enh. If Dadonov is traded and Martinez stays on LTIR, Stone could be activatd if Lehner goes on LTIR. Hypothetically.

If they're both healthy at the same time, Vegas might have to go Tonya Harding on somebody.
 

BlueBaron

Registered User
May 29, 2006
15,752
6,350
Sarnia, On
It looks like Stone won't be able to come off LTIR even if healthy AFTER a Dady trade. They'd have to waive him, and hope someone takes him. What if no one takes him? Then what? This is why the whole LTIR nonsense thing needs to be handled.
Totally. It's a flawed system. It's so complicated and full of loop holes.

Cap shinnanagans are giving the league an awful look.
 
  • Like
Reactions: go4hockey and Daz28

Daz28

Registered User
Nov 1, 2010
12,761
2,217
Enh. If Dadonov is traded and Martinez stays on LTIR, Stone could be activatd if Lehner goes on LTIR. Hypothetically.

If they're both healthy at the same time, Vegas might have to go Tonya Harding on somebody.
Then you'd still have a healthy Alec on LTIR??? Just moving the titanic chairs around.
 

Daz28

Registered User
Nov 1, 2010
12,761
2,217
Er. No. If they're both healthy simultaneously, Vegas is in trouble.
From what I've seen AM will be healthy sooner, and Stone is a much better candidate for, "my back's just not feeling right, I think I should be on SSI"
 
  • Like
Reactions: DickSmehlik

Price is Wright

Registered User
Feb 5, 2010
12,519
5,656
essex
I think you're wrong. Friedman and Marek addressed this on their latest podcast. They are ineligible to play regular season as well.

I was unable to find any evidence of trades after the deadline and the player playing in the NHL, but there were definitely trades where the player played in the AHL after. Rocky Thompson played games for the Panthers AHL team after being traded from the St. John Flames.

It was a while ago so I don't know how rules have changed.
 

jellybeans

Registered User
Nov 9, 2007
1,351
1,138
You do realize any team that "acquires" Dadonov cannot play him for until next season right?
Wrong he can play during the regular season just not the playoffs.

While there is a specific deadline for trades, teams can still acquire players from other clubs after March 21. The caveat is that any player traded after the March 21 deadline is not eligible to be placed on a team's postseason roster. They can play the rest of the regular season with their new squad, however.3 days ago
 

UConn126

Bass Player.
Sponsor
Jun 12, 2010
8,839
7,785
Somerville, MA
why would we take 5 mil of salary on for next season when we already have just 3.5 to sign Bergy?
Bergeron can sign a 1 mil deal with bonuses worth whatever he wants because they can be pushed the following season when we have lot's of money (Smith, Foligno, Haula) all coming off the books.
 

smytty

Registered User
Aug 1, 2015
351
700
Wrong he can play during the regular season just not the playoffs.

While there is a specific deadline for trades, teams can still acquire players from other clubs after March 21. The caveat is that any player traded after the March 21 deadline is not eligible to be placed on a team's postseason roster. They can play the rest of the regular season with their new squad, however.3 days ago
That was my understanding too, but as I said a couple posts back, Friedman and Marek say otherwise.
Also, a quote from Allen Walsh:

Many people think the NHL Trade Deadline is a Trade Deadline. It’s not. Players can still be traded after the Trade Deadline. However, traded players cannot play in any regular season and/or playoff games this season with the acquiring team.​


I'm having a hard time finding reliable info to prove this either way. There's a sporting news article that claims players are eligible to play regular season, but I trust Jeff Marek more than I trust the sporting news.
 

Ciao

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2010
10,220
6,072
Toronto
Double check the trade list and hope the Bruins aren't on it lol

To Bruins:

Dadonov
2023 1st
2022 2nd
2022 NYR 3rd
2023 3rd

To VGK:

Something to make the cap work


The Bruins would have no problem helping out the Golden Knights with some of their cap issues. Just have to pay a little price ;):naughty:
Probably worse than the penalty Vegas would receive for exceeding the cap, without trading Dadanov?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad