If we're being 100% pedantic it's a save "ratio" when spelled out... It used to be given as a percentage number and the old "sv%" marker still lingers. If you think about it, a sub 1.000 "percentage" would always be pretty awful, the goalie letting in more than 99 of every 100 shots....sooo we’re going to act like Rask didn’t take the Bruins to the cup finals twice and that he doesn’t have a .925 save percentage and a 2.22 GAA in the playoffs?
Okay, this isn't even a pet peeve, just one of the mildly amusing discrepancies you tend to notice when you're not a native speaker but had to sweat it at school to understand what the Muricans are saying lol
Interesting to see what comes out of this between Bruins/Providence and Rask. Maybe he has gas in the tank for one last hurrah. He isn't geriatrically old yet for a goalie.