joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,051
- 17,175
Have no idea how the Oilers make it work cap wise, considering they need some additions on back end.
That’s what I’d be fine with. We saw players like Jeff Skinner get $9M though so who knows what some players could get.
I trust Yzerman to not fall into that trap though. He doesn’t really do bad contracts
Or maybe a mod should clear out the frequent useless posts complaining about new threads, since they've already included a perfectly functional "ignore" button for people who are offended by a new thread?We really need just a general Bo Horvat trade thread.
For whatever reason just like with JT Miller, this OP feels like making a dozen new threads a week discussing the same stuff.
A mod should just make a general Horvat thread so half the threads on the first page aren't about Horvat.
Or maybe a mod should clear out the frequent useless posts complaining about new threads, since they've already included a perfectly functional "ignore" button for people who are offended by a new thread?
edmonton should be all over this. They need to be spending first and trying to win now. they have 3 years before Drai is going to be 11-12 mill.
11-12?
Try 14-15
I was trying to be optimistic for them. It depends on how much Matthews rakes in. He is going to set the standard and it could be huge.
If it is a new topic you're after I recommend starting near the last couple pages of the thread.I disagree. I enjoy seeing a new topic come up when there's new information, rather than sifting through 50 pages of general thread nonsense from HF's finest
Mentioning the Leafs drive clicks not value.shocked he did not mention the Leafs---Oilers or Leafs are just the go to teams to try and drive up the trade value--whether or not it makes sense or not
1st in 2024 + Yamamoto + conditional pick 3rd becomes a 2nd if the oilers make the western conference final?
Boston makes so much sensen.
The defense& net are set for a long time, W has quality beyond Marchand.
The only weakness, which is a major one is the C
Bruins loved Horvat in his draft year. Pretty sure Bo and his family thought he was going to Boston as well.
Would be interested to see the cost for him from Boston. Reilly and Smith would have to be out for cap. I wouldn't mind them moving a first for him either if he's extended, not sure they would be able to draft someone who would live up to Horvat's #'s.
Marchand - Bergy - Debrusk
Hall - DK46 - Pasta
Zacha - Horvat - Coyle
Frederic - Foligno - Nosek
Greer
Grizz - Cmac
Hampus - Clifton
Stralman - Carlo
WOOW...
Horvat has been really, really good and if he wasn't a pending ufa his trade value would be pretty high, but in my opinion Pettersson has pretty clearly been the best Canuck player this season. Horvat is much better on faceoffs and has had a great early season as a power play sniper, but Pettersson has had the better all-round game.For people that are not familiar with how Horvat is doing this year, he has 13 goals in 16 games, and has easily been our best player.
They basically wasted a tdl and also the easiest time to trade a player (off-season) if that's the case. It's obviously harder for contenders to fit Horvat now versus the offseason. Seems more like ownership was pressing things and acted like fans did after a little run last season.I think the Canucks have all but decided that Horvat is their best chance of fixing the Defence and prospect pool. They havent negotiated an extension with him since the season started so i dont even think it has anything to do with the Canucks bad start. They saw the writing on the wall before the season even began.
Sure. Edmonton has a whole in the top six on RW, so they traded for Horvat it would let them run with Kane-McDavid-Draisaitl as the most dominant line in the game, and then go with Nuge - Horvat - Hyman on the second line. No more having to rely on Yamamoto's inconsistency and Pulujarvi's inability to engage offensively in the top six.Edmonton?
I'd imagine they'd want Holloway or Broberg as part of the package and Holland has been hesitant to move any big name prospects, regardless of depreciating value.Yep probably pure rental if Edmonton is interested.
Salary could work since Kane is on LTIR and Canucks can retain.
but like you said I dont know if there's any prospect piece that the Oilers could offer that would be more tantilizing to the Canucks compared to offeres that would come from CBJ or Detroit to name a few.
I think the Canucks have all but decided that Horvat is their best chance of fixing the Defence and prospect pool. They havent negotiated an extension with him since the season started so i dont even think it has anything to do with the Canucks bad start. They saw the writing on the wall before the season even began.
Unfortunately, there isn't much else in the Bruins prospect pool that would interest the Canucks if Lysell is off the table. A late 1st and an AHLer aren't going to get a deal done.Yeah they are the best fit by quite a bit IMO.
Lysell + 1st for an extended Horvat makes some sense for everyone involved at the deadline. The Nucks are not getting a better offer than that most likely and the Bruins do it because it allows them to transition away from the Bergeron/Krejci era without having to bottom out.
EDIT: Didn't realize how well Lysell has performed in the AHL so far. Maybe its a bit too much from Boston and Lysell needs to be swapped with something else maybe.
One of my faves was the Miller threads, all 371.6 of them.How about we(avs) trade for him the. Trade him to y’all in the off-season for A 7th
What about all the times they aren’t traded there was chatter if I remember right the avs wanted hovrat last year by didn’t wanna give up byram
Count Bruins out until maybe the off season .........Watch Boston get him and they'll just continue to be good for the next 5 years with Horvat/Pasta/McAvoy/Lindholm and however long Marchand and Bergeron stick around...