kimzey59
Registered User
- Aug 16, 2003
- 6,050
- 2,433
This is scary seeing as he was the slowest player on the avalanche
He was also their 2nd best player in the PO's.
This is scary seeing as he was the slowest player on the avalanche
Saad for sure.Sign Saad for free (assets, not dollars) or trade Thomas, Kyrou and a 1st for MT?
if im trading those, they go towards eichel not tkachuk.Sign Saad for free (assets, not dollars) or trade Thomas, Kyrou and a 1st for MT?
Sign Saad for free (assets, not dollars) or trade Thomas, Kyrou and a 1st for MT?
this has to be a troll postSign Saad for free (assets, not dollars) or trade Thomas, Kyrou and a 1st for MT?
this has to be a troll post
Wait, what rumors? I've only seen that in HFBoards. Was there speculation that I missed?That was the rumor asking price for MT?
Wait, what rumors? I've only seen that in HFBoards. Was there speculation that I missed?
I think your first quote is just ONE Blues fan that said it here over and over.Blues fans: Avs are a 1 line team!!!!! Avs are a 1 line team!!!!! They have no depth and their goalie sucks.
Also Blues fans: Look at all the quality depth the Avs lost. Plus they lost their goalie, They are going to be so much worse.
Yeah, but where? That's why I'm asking. If there were speculation from Friedman, or Pagnotta, or anywhere, I'd like to know.That’s just what I read it would cost.
we don't have the picks or premium prospects Calgary would demand. They ofc know this and would want core pieces from the current lineup that I and prob Army would say hell no to. I think a MT trade is all but fantasy at this point. Nothing indicates that he's on the block and prob won't be moved unless someone wows Treliving with a no brainer offer.That was the rumor asking price for MT?
Yeah, but where? That's why I'm asking. If there were speculation from Friedman, or Pagnotta, or anywhere, I'd like to know.
So glad we got Saad on a reasonable deal like that! This is a win.
While it's true both Steen and Perron took big steps in production in their age 29 season, they are by far the exception.I'm on the record as not being a big fan of the term in this deal, primarily because it might prevent us from doing other things down the road if the cap doesn't rise soon, but I really wish we could get away from the absolutism that seems to exist about players regressing because they are getting older. If you want to base your argument on the deterioration of a specific skill, especially one that makes the player valuable, then that's fine. But this idea that a player is not going to be worth their contract in 5 years based solely on the idea that they've had a few birthdays is lazy. David Perron is an example of why that simply isn't a universal truth. Even when the physical skills start to diminish, a player's hockey IQ and experience can help them play smarter and actually be as effective if not more so.
While it's true both Steen and Perron took big steps in production in their age 29 season, they are by far the exception.