Blues fire HC Drew Bannister; hire Jim Montgomery as new HC

geebster

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2019
2,081
3,233
It is the perfect fit, but understandable if other fans don't know about the established connections.
Lots of established connections and he was an assistant there but I said that because I feel that St Louis isn't that close and Montgomery is a better coach for a more established contender. Could be wrong, I don't follow the Blues that closely but to me they seem like a team on the other end of their contention window and need to rebuild a bit.
 

ChicagoBlues

Terraformers
Oct 24, 2006
15,925
6,723
Lots of established connections and he was an assistant there but I said that because I feel that St Louis isn't that close and Montgomery is a better coach for a more established contender. Could be wrong, I don't follow the Blues that closely but to me they seem like a team on the other end of their contention window and need to rebuild a bit.
You could be right. This move looks like it is one of those preemptive, slightly impulsive things that DA does. This is a good situation, though. Many of us thought the team would be the WC2 and get bounced in the 1st round or just miss the playoffs altogether. So, we're not far from being competitive, but at least 2-3 years from being seriously competitive.

Army struck while the iron was hot. Let's just make sure we forge a beautiful sword and not an anchor.
 

JianYang

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
19,567
18,970
Average time the last 3 Bruins head coaches remained unemployed after being fired.....6 day

That is pretty remarkable. Wonder if prospective coaches for the bruins look at that track record as a positive or a negative.
 

stl76

No. 5 in your programs, No. 1 in your hearts
Jul 2, 2015
9,483
9,070
Crazy the Blues are going to pay three coaches this year to finish outside of the playoffs. Dumb, dumb, dumb. But at least they got their guy, i guess.
Don't think the Blues are paying 3 coaches. Thought usually a coach's contract ended when they signed with a new team (Toronto in this case). Could be wrong, but I thought that was the norm. This would also relate to Monty's term (if he leaves before 5 years probably wouldn't be unemployed long so ownership wouldn't be paying him not to coach long either). Unless I'm just completely wrong about coaching contracts...

Anyway, they can't be paying Bannister very much and if the ownership group is on board then honestly who gives a f*** lol

Monty had 3 games to 1 lead twice bumbled once with historic point season team and almost coughed it up another 3 to 1 lead against leafs. I'm not sure why is so hyped to be so amazing?
Funnily enough, his career did not begin and end with coaching the Boston bruins :eyeroll:
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,824
19,327
Connecticut
That is pretty remarkable. Wonder if prospective coaches for the bruins look at that track record as a positive or a negative.

No idea, I'd be more concerned that the team felt Brice was too hard and got him fired. Monty was the polar opposite and they quit on him after 2 seasons.
 

Reality Czech

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
5,884
9,509
In not convinced he's a very good HC.

Think he'd very much be available in June/July

Not sure about your second statement. I feel like if he wanted a job now someone else would have signed him if we hadn't.

As for his coaching abilities, I guess we'll have to wait and see how the Blues do in the next couple years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad