jjniner
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2016
- 513
- 325
On that list, I'd like Lindholm.Just looking at a list of upcoming UFAs, some names over the course of the season could be:
Giordano
Rielly
Lindholm
Ekholm
From what I've gathered Ducks fans would be reluctant to trade him....just because you do still need leaders and good players even during a rebuild. He has looked good in pre-season I think too.On that list, I'd like Lindholm.
Also, if we are talking about adding someone today, Anaheim is the only team that has acknowledged that they are rebuilding, and so they might make a future-focused move today, rather than cling to hope that they might be a playoff team.
I haven't watched Lindholm lately, but a few years ago he was an amazing top pairing guy. A bit boring, but ate tons of minutes and always seemed to do the right thing with the puck.
On that list, I'd like Lindholm.
Also, if we are talking about adding someone today, Anaheim is the only team that has acknowledged that they are rebuilding, and so they might make a future-focused move today, rather than cling to hope that they might be a playoff team.
I haven't watched Lindholm lately, but a few years ago he was an amazing top pairing guy. A bit boring, but ate tons of minutes and always seemed to do the right thing with the puck.
Romanov for Thomas is a fair trade imo.
Suzuki/Dvorak/Thomas would be ideal and imagine Romanov with his physicality with the Blues.
Romanov for Thomas?
No thanks.
Not the type of D that we need. There is no way soneone like Tomanov would be able to replace Bouwmeester
From what I've gathered Ducks fans would be reluctant to trade him....just because you do still need leaders and good players even during a rebuild. He has looked good in pre-season I think too.
Barring a huge step forward for Krug this year (mainly in terms of defensive play), he is a 2nd pairing defenseman. We need a shutdown guy that can play with Parayko so that Krug gets bumped down to the 2nd pairing where he belongs and so Scandella isn't in the top 4 anymore. He doesn't need to necessarily be a #1 defenseman, just someone who is serviceable on the top pairing and is sound defensively. Basically we need Bouwmeester or Edmundson back.I am confused you have Krug..................
Barring a huge step forward for Krug this year (mainly in terms of defensive play), he is a 2nd pairing defenseman. We need a shutdown guy that can play with Parayko so that Krug gets bumped down to the 2nd pairing where he belongs and so Scandella isn't in the top 4 anymore. He doesn't need to necessarily be a #1 defenseman, just someone who is serviceable on the top pairing and is sound defensively. Basically we need Bouwmeester or Edmundson back.
I’m not saying anything that I think romanov would be good for stl, but I’m pretty sure romanov’ nhl comparison in the way he plays is jay bouwmeester I’m actually pretty sure that there was an article written about it, which I’m unable to find right now to post but I will keep lookingNo thanks.
Not the type of D that we need. There is no way soneone like Tomanov would be able to replace Bouwmeester
I’m not saying anything that I think romanov would be good for stl, but I’m pretty sure romanov’ nhl comparison in the way he plays is jay bouwmeester I’m actually pretty sure that there was an article written about it, which I’m unable to find right now to post but I will keep looking