Post-Game Talk: - Blues 7 - Jets 2, Jets lead series 2-1 | Page 14 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Post-Game Talk: Blues 7 - Jets 2, Jets lead series 2-1

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s fair for me to question Chevy based off the lack of post season success since 2011.

NHL general managers are rarely employed for such a period, and the team’s post season performance does not warrant such level of unwavering loyalty.
His job is to assemble a good team. Clearly he did that

It's up to the coaches and players to execute in thr playoffs

Why don't you step back from the ledge for a second and see how things play out?
 
Next thing we are going to be granting him prima nocta rights :laugh:
I guess it is safe to assume that this is your phone wallpaper? :sarcasm:
1745679113845.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jets 31
It’s fair for me to question Chevy based off the lack of post season success since 2011.

NHL general managers are rarely employed for such a period, and the team’s post season performance does not warrant such level of unwavering loyalty.
I agree when you look at it from the POV of the entire tenure. GMs last 5ish years, he's 3x that. Id pose the question for someone that knows: how many gm's in history get 10+ years with a team without coming close to a Cup or a SCF appearances?

However, the Jets as of late have done real well and that will hold more weight I think. If the Jets weren't going to move from Chevy years ago I doubt they will be even thinking about given the team now.

Ironically, the fact that the Jets are not a FA destination actually helped this team turn it around with the PLD trade. If PLD wanted to stay, the team would have re-signed him for sure imo. Also, can't gloss over this either getting Bowness in, regardless if it was last resort after Trotz or not, and rebuilding the team culture etc (can argue it was broken under his watch).
 
I agree when you look at it from the POV of the entire tenure. GMs last 5ish years, he's 3x that. Id pose the question for someone that knows: how many gm's in history get 10+ years with a team without coming close to a Cup or a SCF appearances?

However, the Jets as of late have done real well and that will hold more weight I think. If the Jets weren't going to move from Chevy years ago I doubt they will be even thinking about given the team now.

Ironically, the fact that the Jets are not a FA destination actually helped this team turn it around with the PLD trade. If PLD wanted to stay, the team would have re-signed him for sure imo. Also, can't gloss over this either getting Bowness in, regardless if it was last resort after Trotz or not, and rebuilding the team culture etc (again can argue it was broken under his watch).

Poile got 20 years with the Preds before they made a finals appearance, then he got another 6 years after that. Now Trotz is completely butchering every move with that team. Grass isn't always greener.
 
Poile got 20 years with the Preds before they made a finals appearance, then he got another 6 years after that.
Yeah so final answer to how many is 1? out of how many gm's ever.
 
Last edited:
Yeah 1 out of how many gm's ever.

Very few get that long of a leash. Wilson was another with the sharks 19 seasons and 1 Cup finals. McPhee got 17 years with the Caps and no Cups.

Seems it's more of a trend with smaller-mid market teams nowadays to keep GMs longer. I'd imagine if Chevy hadn't navigated a lot of those trades so well he would have been out a lot sooner.
 
Very few get that long of a leash. Wilson was another with the sharks 19 seasons and 1 Cup finals. McPhee got 17 years with the Caps and no Cups.

Seems it's more of a trend with smaller-mid market teams nowadays to keep GMs longer. I'd imagine if Chevy hadn't navigated a lot of those trades so well he would have been out a lot sooner.
OK so 3 in history? Very few get that long of a leash is essentially what I was getting at.
Off quick thought I'd say for Wilson probably had the best resume of that group.

Perhaps on your second point. The Jets are in the midst of their best stretch of years and the vibes/culture is in a better place. No one is thinking of firing him now.
 
OK so 3 in history? Very few get that long of a leash is essentially what I was getting at.
Off quick thought I'd say for Wilson probably had the best resume of that group.

Perhaps on your second point. The Jets are in the midst of their best stretch of years and the vibes/culture is in a better place. No one is thinking of firing him now.

Yeah he's likely safe until the downturn that will likely follow Scheif and Helle's decline in ability.
 
I agree when you look at it from the POV of the entire tenure. GMs last 5ish years, he's 3x that. Id pose the question for someone that knows: how many gm's in history get 10+ years with a team without coming close to a Cup or a SCF appearances?

However, the Jets as of late have done real well and that will hold more weight I think. If the Jets weren't going to move from Chevy years ago I doubt they will be even thinking about given the team now.

Ironically, the fact that the Jets are not a FA destination actually helped this team turn it around with the PLD trade. If PLD wanted to stay, the team would have re-signed him for sure imo. Also, can't gloss over this either getting Bowness in, regardless if it was last resort after Trotz or not, and rebuilding the team culture etc (can argue it was broken under his watch).

I also wonder if Winnipeg being an unpopular destination helped the jets sell high on him, with other teams assuming that inconsistent play was due to him just naturally wanting out. Dubois being middling while playing in LA made it a lot more obvious that he had something else going effort/psychology wise.
 
Interesting fact:

In the past 100 years, only 40 GMs have won the cup

Does that make every other GM a failure?

I think at the end of the day, TNSE's primary goal is to build a skilled and entertaining team that can win games on a nightly basis in order to keep the fans engaged

Of course they'd love to win a cup, but there is so much more that goes into it than just roster construction

Ultimately... if, as a fan, your only acceptable outcome every year is if your team makes the finals or wins the cup, then ultimately you're responsible for your own disappointment
 
Beyond first round picks, and Barlow, Lambert, and Yager?

Who would you have targeted to fill a glaring 2C hole say the last few years? Provide specifics.

The focal point of your statements are that you think Chevy has done a good enough job to build, and propel the team forward since being hired in 2011.

So be it I suppose, but I think a franchise should set higher expectations of their executives.

I think a prime example of what Chevy has to deal with is that they were heavily in on Nelson but he preferred to go to Colorado, and had the trade protection to make it happen.

Chevy has this job for as long as he wants, it seems. I can see him leaving once the team starts declining into missing the playoffs regularly but not when they're comfortably making the playoffs each year.
 
So I see the Jets are not the only ones who don't get the call on interference but it was funny this goal the Oilers scored on was because an interference penalty on the Kings.
 
So I see the Jets are not the only ones who don't get the call on interference but it was funny this goal the Oilers scored on was because an interference penalty on the Kings.

Was he supposed to get out of his way?

Holding maybe, but not interference. He's have to actually step in front of him for it to be interference
 
Beyond first round picks, and Barlow, Lambert, and Yager?

Who would you have targeted to fill a glaring 2C hole say the last few years? Provide specifics.

The focal point of your statements are that you think Chevy has done a good enough job to build, and propel the team forward since being hired in 2011.

So be it I suppose, but I think a franchise should set higher expectations of their executives.
I'm not the one bitching about Chevy but nice diversion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog
The problem with trading away high draft picks and promising young prospects for veterans that may or may not get you over the hump is always about long term outlook. Which is something the GM of an NHL team in Winnipeg has to constantly keep in mind. Prospects offer control, vets on expiring contracts do not. Trading away the farm to take a crack at the hardest trophy to win in sports is always going to be a risk but doubly so when you are Winnipeg.

We don't always know what kind of conversations Chevy is having but it's always going to be tough when you are the most listed team on no trade lists. Chevy has done a decent job at getting us out of a pickle. Kane, Trouba, Laine, Copp, PLD. He navigated those situations pretty well, a job that I know for a fact a lot of other GM's would have botched hard. He has his gaffes as well but so far the positives have outweighed the negatives. He's put together a decent team and I don't think he was simply sitting on the sidelines this year. We know for a fact he's tried hard to get a number of players and been willing to make competitive offers but when those players simply do not want to go to Winnipeg there is only so much he can do. We were always going to be a draft and develop team first and foremost and that is what has gotten us to where we are. We draft and develop players and when they want out we trade them for players that will hopefully remain. Rinse and repeat. Selling the farm for rental vets is antithetical to that philosophy. Don't get me wrong I want Chevy to go out and get all the Stones and Nelsons, but I'm also realistic about our position in this league.

We only lost 1 game, we can come back and win this. We should get DeMelo back in the lineup, possibly Vilardi which will provide a jolt. Blues get last change on the road, we knew they would be hungry, just gotta win this next game and take it back to the Peg. No need to panic yet.
Extremely well said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog
Not a diversion.

You’ve ignored every question I’ve asked, and then get upset because you know where the answers lead.
I'm not a big fan of people who use strawmen, diversion, and manipulation of words to debate, so I'll just leave it at that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad