PocketNines
Cutter's Way
Bramptfordon-Boulangerie visits Kelowna tonight 705pm PACIFIC
Stancl is the only prospect in action today Tues Jan 21
Stancl is the only prospect in action today Tues Jan 21
I don't see why not if Dvorsky can. But I suspect he would go to the AHL first since Kelowna may not make its playoffs and their season would end March 23, there being 10 games left for Springfield. Especially if they call Dvorsky up at the endCan Stancl get a 9 game trial in the NHL this year without burning an ELC year?
Wow, that's a bold statement from you. But it excites me. Thanks for posting your insights. I'm looking forward to following Stancl's progress, you've given me high hopes for him.In fact if this player overcomes the skating question I think he is the #1 prospect in the organization. His total 200' pro style game is already past Dvorsky, Stenberg and Snuggy, it really is
In fact if this player overcomes the skating question I think he is the #1 prospect in the organization. His total 200' pro style game is already past Dvorsky, Stenberg and Snuggy, it really is
yesIs Stancl a C or a winger?
Is Stancl a C or a winger?
As long as you're clear why I'm saying it.That's a massive claim. I'd like to see how he does in the AHL next year compared to a healthy Zach Dean. That will be telling because I can safely see one of those two as a future 3C based on potential. It's possible Stancl becomes something more but putting him above Dvorsky is wild at this point. Glad you're excited about him though.
I’ve liked what l’ve seen from the clips of him so far, could be a blessing in disguise he got injured his draft year. If he was healthy no way the Blues get him at 16th overall.Jiricek runs a better power play than anyone in St. Louis. What incredible vision and passing by him at the point. I was not pleased on draft night, but I'm a believer in him now that I've watched more of him this season. He may well be the 1D we have been seeking.
No, I read the totality of your statement. I can concede that his defensive game is better than Dvorksy's, but I wouldn't put Stancl as the #1 prospect in the organization. I get why you're excited about him because I am too, but he has a lot more to prove offensively to put him above Dalibor, and I'm fairly certain the Blues' development staff would agree. We're talking a prospect who was nearly a goal per game player in the OHL and was rated as best shot, best stickhandler, and second smartest player in the league by the coaches. Of course Stancl plays in the WHL, but I don't think he would get that type of praise in the OHL.As long as you're clear why I'm saying it.
Aside from skating, the rest of his game is more complete than Dvorsky's. Certainly you don't watch them both and think Dvorsky is better on the defensive side of the puck? So you can then understand the if-then conditional, and understand why it's reasonable.
It's a little annoying to be so clear about the if-then and then have it so quickly misunderstood tbh, but it's a given, people are going to skim and conclude a different thing than what I am saying, then go after that thing.
I am just saying IF-THEN. Like I said I have Stancl at #5, behind Dvorsky Lindstein Stenberg and Snuggy as I sit here watching all his games today. I am agreeing with the scouts before me who see a complete player minus the skating (whatever "loses focus" was, that is not this player at all any more, he is like ROR focus out there).No, I read the totality of your statement. I can concede that his defensive game is better than Dvorksy's, but I wouldn't put Stancl as the #1 prospect in the organization. I get why you're excited about him because I am too, but he has a lot more to prove offensively to put him above Dalibor, and I'm fairly certain the Blues' development staff would agree. We're talking a prospect who was nearly a goal per game player in the OHL and was rated as best shot, best stickhandler, and second smartest player in the league by the coaches. Of course Stancl plays in the WHL, but I don't think he would get that type of praise in the OHL.
I do apologize for not acknowledging your conditional statement initially. Like you said, it's a hypothetical. What are we expecting that improvement to really look like? In theory, any player could improve an area and turn that weakness into a strength, but it's impossible to rank prospects in such a fashion because it's not only wishful, but we would lack any agreement regarding degree of improvement.I am just saying IF-THEN. Like I said I have Stancl at #5, behind Dvorsky Lindstein Stenberg and Snuggy as I sit here watching all his games today. I am agreeing with the scouts before me who see a complete player minus the skating (whatever "loses focus" was, that is not this player at all any more, he is like ROR focus out there).
"If he continues to improve his skating and work ethic, Stancl should find a home in the NHL as a good bottom-six center to someone in the third-fourth round area. If his skating improves dramatically, he may even have some higher potential than that"
I am agreeing with this assessment. IF his skating is something he can pull a Backes on (improves "dramatically" which nobody can 'expect'), this is a very very special player then, and it would make him #1. I am watching as many of these players as I possibly can right now and I definitely don't decide in advance which ones to get excited about, they have to show it. This one, in the beginning of this season, Oct and Nov, Stancl was good but more like a complementary player to a serious play driver on his line, so it's tougher to see his own driving ability. Now that he is by himself (they got a tall skilled draft eligible player in Hayden Paupanekis who is on his line now, #23) you can really see how much of it is him. In his team's games, they are getting caved. I watched all of a 10-0 loss and a 7-3 loss, and the game I saw in person they won but were outshot like 52-24. But when Stancl is out there, the play is generally going Kelowna's way. It's a ton of heavy lifting and he is getting a lot of practice at it.
I did not expect to see what I am seeing from him. I'm not convinced until I see him skate with pros. But every other thing he is doing on the ice is something we would want our prospect to be doing, and at this level his skating is definitely not an issue. It is very clear that he has both worked on it and the confidence he has is infusing him, both things. We are in a wait and see mode.
I'm trying to get across that the rest of his game is so good that in its total well roundedness, if he pulls a Backes then yes I think he is above those other forwards. The other forwards are great! No ding on them! None of them have Stancl's size, but Stancl has real offensive skills: passing, shooting, vision, IQ to go along with the 200' defensive responsibility that definitely is above the other three.
The Blues could so badly use another Michal Handzus. It's tantalizing with Stancl, you can see he has leveled up. The WJC was not a fluke.
No worries I was bracing for it and holding back saying it for awhile because I was worried it would be mistaken, so I'm glad I got to explain it betterI do apologize for not acknowledging your conditional statement initially. Like you said, it's a hypothetical. What are we expecting that improvement to really look like? In theory, any player could improve an area and turn that weakness into a strength, but it's impossible to rank prospects in such a fashion because it's not only wishful, but we would lack any agreement regarding degree of improvement.
He is the most swiss army knife prospect that we have, he can play any forward position.Springfield has Stenberg listed as a center on their website but that can't be right, people on the internets said he was a left wing and they seemed really certain about it. Must be a typo.
View attachment 965828
Maybe you should see whether they actually play him at center (which they haven’t yet) before you take a victory lap.Springfield has Stenberg listed as a center on their website but that can't be right, people on the internets said he was a left wing and they seemed really certain about it. Must be a typo.
View attachment 965828