All The Kings Men
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2016
- 1,987
- 5,958
I genuinely believe that's NOT what he was trying to do.I agree that my 40's self would disagree with a lot of the things my 20's self thought.
But I think my 20 year old self was 100% right on Rob Blake, once you remove the C from your jersey as a contract negotiating ploy you can F-off forever.
I suppose we'll never know for sure but I think his position was that the team captain shouldn't be a distraction and that his contract negotiation was a distraction.
It was portrayed as a defiant act of self interest when with the benefit of hindsight I believe it was a misunderstood act of selflessness.
I also think the union was pressuring him and since his contract would have an impact on a non-cap world and other players coming up behind him I can see him feeling like he had an obligation to the rest of the league.It was an insult to the importance of wearing a C in the National Hockey League.
Blake also greatly overstated his value, he demanded to be the highest paid defenseman in the league, and he was clearly not as good as Lidstrom or Pronger. It's not as if the Kings were insulting him with the offers that were made. Like they did with Robitaille a year later.