giza
Registered User
- Jul 19, 2011
- 1,439
- 633
Hopefully trade bait for Garland.Entwistle is so useless, what's his role?
Hopefully trade bait for Garland.Entwistle is so useless, what's his role?
How about Kane? I would rather be franchise all-time leading scorer than have another Cup. Got 3 of those.
Please, explain them then, since you are so smart.The impact cards are 100% spot on.
I don't think many understand them.
Korchinski was complete garbage yesterday and the game before and you cannot hide it with the impact cards.
I love it. It's like a breath of fresh, honest air.
The bar was low but yeah, Reichel was better at times.I actually didn't think Reichel played bad at all. He made a couple good defensive plays. Had a couple explosive plays offensively, one of which drew a penalty. He is a work in progress at C, but I thought this game was his best so far.
he did play his best game but still think a few games on AA wing would help his confidence.I actually didn't think Reichel played bad at all. He made a couple good defensive plays. Had a couple explosive plays offensively, one of which drew a penalty. He is a work in progress at C, but I thought this game was his best so far.
This makes sense to me and I was hoping that Hall would be that guy but thus far it doesn't look like it.I've seen people suggest putting Bedard with another skilled winger such as Reichel and I'm not sure I agree. Bedard needs someone who can retrieve the puck and get it to him. I'm a big fan of having high-end "diggers" play with skilled guys. They need the puck on their sticks and Bedard doesn't strike me as someone who will be all that great at retrieving pucks himself. Reichel, Kane, Panarin are not either.
Hall - Bedard - Kane/Panarin type would be chasing the puck even more than what that line is now, IMO.
Fiddy are you delexiac?
I figured Hall was to give Bedard some skill to play with and Donato would bring the hustle. I think I'd leave the lines as is and give them time to build some chemistry and for Bedard to learn how to play better without the puck. And not that it's a priority right now, but that vet line is playing well. I would be curious to see Foligno play up if any one of those two.This makes sense to me and I was hoping that Hall would be that guy but thus far it doesn't look like it.
I'd hate to break up the veteran line but perhaps Dickinson and/or Foligno may work better than what this line brings currently. Adding one or both of those guys would also serve to shore it up defensively. If Dickerson moves over it would also mean that one of Dickinson or Bedard would need to play wing but to be honest I don't think it matters that much where Bedard plays as long as he gets the puck in scoring positions. IMO, playing the wing would not be the terrible thing that I have read from other folks here.
I don't think so ......One of the few times HF50 responded to someone else was when he claimed his typos were from typing on a cell phone. I think that is still the case. Why he doesn't proof read what he has posted is beyond me hence it comes across as his schtick.I figured he's using talk to text/translate and he's speaking an ancient form of Inuit.
He also responded to one of my posts before, to tell me I spelled a player’s name wrong.I don't think so ......One of the few times HF50 responded to someone else was when he claimed his typos were from typing on a cell phone. I think that is still the case. Why he doesn't proof read what he has posted is beyond me hence it comes across as his schtick.
Agreed. So much more goes into building a line that just putting 3 highly skilled players together. It’s why I’d love to end up with Michael Brandsegg-Nygard with one of our firsts this year. Heavy shot, enough offensive instincts to keep up with Bedard, and an absolute menace on the forecheckVlasic looks great and a pleasant surprise. A tall, smart, mobile defenseman who knows how to use his stick can control so much. Love seeing him be physical, despite that apparently being a knock against him before this year.
I've seen people suggest putting Bedard with another skilled winger such as Reichel and I'm not sure I agree. Bedard needs someone who can retrieve the puck and get it to him. I'm a big fan of having high-end "diggers" play with skilled guys. They need the puck on their sticks and Bedard doesn't strike me as someone who will be all that great at retrieving pucks himself. Reichel, Kane, Panarin are not either.
Hall - Bedard - Kane/Panarin type would be chasing the puck even more than what that line is now, IMO.
I don't think they will change.I wouldn't change Bedards linemates much. Helps him grow and Hall has skill to play with him while Donato can hustle and get his 15 goals.
I wouldn't change Bedards linemates much. Helps him grow and Hall has skill to play with him while Donato can hustle and get his 15 goals.