Bizarre situation in in Colorado

[Muffin]

Seattle challenged Colorado's goal for offside. Review showed Lehkonen was offside so the goal was called off. They review the play the again then realized Seattle shot the puck into their own zone so it was called a goal again.

Click to read more...

 

[BB79]

Bizarre thing happened at the bazaar today..

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Seattle challenged Colorado's goal for offside. Review showed Lehkonen was offside so the goal was called off. They review the play the again then realized Seattle shot the puck into their own zone so it was called a goal again.

What do you mean they reviewed it again? Did Col challenge the challenge? (Is that even a thing)

 

[Muffin]

What do you mean they reviewed it again? Did Col challenge the challenge? (Is that even a thing)

No idea they looked at the play again before they dropped the puck.

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

What do you mean they reviewed it again? Did Col challenge the challenge? (Is that even a thing)

We dont know.

I suspect the league intervened to fix what was about to be an error by the officiating crew. They sounded the horn just as they were about to drop the puck and play on.

 

[kingsholygrail]

Maybe Toronto gave them a call?

 

[jackjohnson]

Seattle challenged Colorado's goal for offside. Review showed Lehkonen was offside so the goal was called off. They review the play the again then realized Seattle shot the puck into their own zone so it was called a goal again.

NHL is a 3rd rate league due to stuff like this

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

NHL is a 3rd rate league due to stuff like this

For getting calls right?


Certainly a take.

 

[jackjohnson]

For getting calls right?


Certainly a take.

No, for not getting it right the 1st time. Need 10 reviews to get it right.

 

[tarheelhockey]

Maybe Toronto gave them a call?

Sounds like it. Understandable how it could play out that the refs on the ice would review the play for what the coach challenged, then issue their ruling up to Toronto, then Toronto notices that there’s another contextual factor that the refs failed to consider.

No real issue with this as there is a lot going on at ice level and the purpose of Toronto is to catch stuff like this.

 

[JoeSakic13]

For getting calls right?


Certainly a take.

Coach’s challenge.

No definitive evidence that it’s a take.

 

[Canada4Gold]

While odd they got it right. If the refs/linesman review a play and because of a weird sequence of events they get it wrong I'm happy someone(whether the NHL office or Colorado) clarified to them what actually happened and they're still allowed to alter their review decision once they understand.

 

[RoyIsALegend]

Eddie O is still confused as to what happened, despite the referee clearly explaining it.

 

[Anglesmith]

No, for not getting it right the 1st time. Need 10 reviews to get it right.

Are you essentially saying that all of the other leagues do better? Because if so...

 

[Avs2022]

NHL is a 3rd rate league due to stuff like this

Yeah. Getting it right is a bad thing.

 

[jackjohnson]

Are you essentially saying that all of the other leagues do better? Because if so...

Yes other leagues do it better. Even in tonights game they changed Hughes assist 50 times...just ridiculous.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

Yes other leagues do it better. Even in tonights game they changed Hughes assist 50 times...just ridiculous.

Have you not seen NFL officiating?

 

[Anglesmith]

Yes other leagues do it better. Even in tonights game they changed Hughes assist 50 times...just ridiculous.

Have you not seen video review in any league other than professional tennis?

 

[tarheelhockey]

Yes other leagues do it better. Even in tonights game they changed Hughes assist 50 times...just ridiculous.

Have you not seen video review in Professional Bull Riding?

 

[jackjohnson]

Have you not seen video review in Professional Bull Riding?

So you are now comparing NHL to Bull riding? I guess you prove my point that NHL is a 3rd rate league