Biggest Disappointment This Season

[Behind Enemy Lines]

Jeff Jackson playing GM for a day should put to rest the idea that agents are capable of building a hockey team. Agents spend their entire career thinking of reasons and making excuses for why their player should be paid as much or more as the previous guy. Thats their sole purpose. It’s not in their best interest to consider all their hockey skills as a whole but rather to downplay or outright ignore their weaknesses and upsell their strengths. All these guys are equal to them one way or another.

I don't think this can be a blanket statement indictment. There's some examples where it has worked notably Zito but he had substantive years of progressive pro hockey management experience before getting the gig in Florida. Even then he surrounded himself with a group of senior hockey advisors Rick Dudley, Les Jackson, and Paul Fenton who were vital resources to him. Brian Lawton with agency experience helped build a good foundation in Tampa. I think the Montreal model of deep rebuild is being watched.

Jackson seemed to be a good hire. Spoke of how his agency experience gave a world view of organizational best practices across key function areas, played the game at NHL level, and had some team management experience. Maybe a part of the issue was timing and circumstantial of the executive role to him (without Ken Holland training wheels) and requirement of immediate, significant personnel decisions to deal with. BIG difference from theoretical to immediate huge personnel decisions that carried risk-reward amplified by coming off a Game 7 Cup run. Decisions made with essentially in-house people in an organization that has some significant misses and some hits.

I was really bullish on the Jackson hire for the diversity of experience and philosophy he was espousing. However the summer decisions of he and oiler management have significantly hurt this team at this existential point of their winning window.

 

[5 Mins 4 Ftg]

Funny how in the last 9 months;

Ottawa addressed goaltending.
Colorado addressed goaltending.
LA addressed goaltending.
Washington addressed goaltending.
New Jersey addressed goaltending.
Seattle addressed goaltending.
Hell - Even San Jose and Chicago addressed goaltending.

But we are constantly told goalies aren’t out there and when they are we sign Jack f***ing Campbell. Only to be fed “SkInNeR gOt ThEm To GaMe SeVeN”.

Dustin Schwartz has cast an evil spell on this franchise.

 

[Lay Z Boy GM]

McLeod, lmao, watching him turtle from any physical contact in the playoffs was an embarrassment. Good riddance to that little Mary.

Not disagreeing but I do wish we could have kept him, I just wouldn’t want to pay the guy much money.

He’s not physical but his speed was useful and he was part of an amazing PK. That speed tires out the opposition too.

The lack of edge is just so noticeable in the playoffs.

 

[TopShelfGloveSide]

So you expected Mcdavid to go from 150+ to 130+ points to barely 100?

I expect him to easily put up 100.

 

[Drivesaitl]

I agree to an extent. McLeod could still be more than Savoie though. McLeod is just a bottom six talent so it's not a huge deal. But, it would have been good to keep him if we were going to populate the bottom six with so many 30+ year old forwards.

The punch to the gut to our youth was the mishandling of Holloway and Broberg. This might have much deeper consequences than most think.

I don't get the degree of consternation with McLeod on the board. So a guy that is excellent at pk, has top speed in league, is aces at zone exits and entries and can knock in 15 goals a year. Thats not of any value? The opinions on him seem to give him no credit at all for what he does do well and frankly we have half a dozen forwards on this roster that don't even approach what McLeod was doing here consistently.

Thing is McLeod was an established NHL player, a can't miss NHL player that will have a long career in this league and will contribute. Thats bird in the hand stuff. Say what people want about McLeods lack of physicality its zero in Savoie and in a recent game Savoie at Center was flat out put on his back by Killorn in Anaheim game. They go onto score the goal. I mean put flat on his back taking faceoff.

So the talk about physicality is odd. Savoie barely seems to have the strength to play at this level.

Matt Savoie has 4 games here and was getting steamrolled. -4 in 4GP. Too early to tell but Savoie is no certainty at NHL level. McLeod always was.

 

[Drivesaitl]

Not disagreeing but I do wish we could have kept him, I just wouldn’t want to pay the guy much money.

He’s not physical but his speed was useful and he was part of an amazing PK. That speed tires out the opposition too.

The lack of edge is just so noticeable in the playoffs.

Its not like the club has even remotely addressed that aspect. So we get rid of soft McLeod, other "nothings" like Holloway, Broberg, Foegele and replace them with who exactly thats been useful. Was a classic case of an org disrespecting the players it had and being seduced by players they seemingly knew less about than they thought.

Jackson guilty of trying to be the smartest guy in the room. Lets get a guy off two backsurgeries that could barely finish any games last season. Lets get another that was getting bought out by the worst club in the league. These were going to be answers. And Podkolzin. That brings us back to physicality. Is a player ONLY offering a modicum of physicality useful when they can't finish a play to save their lives? Is that player more useful than a Holloway or McLeod or Foegele that could have had more time on Drais wings this season and usually did well with him.

 

[Messrules11]

I don't get the degree of consternation with McLeod on the board. So a guy that is excellent at pk, has top speed in league, is aces at zone exits and entries and can knock in 15 goals a year. Thats not of any value? The opinions on him seem to give him no credit at all for what he does do well and frankly we have half a dozen forwards on this roster that don't even approach what McLeod was doing here consistently.

Thing is McLeod was an established NHL player, a can't miss NHL player that will have a long career in this league and will contribute. Thats bird in the hand stuff. Say what people want about McLeods lack of physicality its zero in Savoie and in a recent game Savoie at Center was flat out put on his back by Killorn in Anaheim game. They go onto score the goal. I mean put flat on his back taking faceoff.

So the talk about physicality is odd. Savoie barely seems to have the strength to play at this level.

Matt Savoie has 4 games here and was getting steamrolled. -4 in 4GP. Too early to tell but Savoie is no certainty at NHL level. McLeod always was.

Spare us the McLeod love, it was embarrassing to watch him in the playoffs. That showing was his ticket out of here. He can go score 15 for Buffalo and not have to worry about playoff hockey ever again.