phillipmike
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2009
- 12,709
- 8,634
Howell to the (phantom) DL. good move. we should do that more.
Wonder if Grilli is next for Sparkman when he is ready.
Last edited:
Howell to the (phantom) DL. good move. we should do that more.
As someone who is probably one of the bigger Shapkins fans, if they pass on Alex Faedo to take Logan Warmoth, I would probably start hating them more then Zeke.
So judging a GM based on a single draft choice in a notoriously crap shoot type of draft with more information than every draft/scouting prognostication put together is the final straw?
Ok I may have exaggerated a little , I would still be angry though. Warmoth is the Deck McGuire and Jon Harris of the draft, a player who is decent at everything, but the best you can hope for is a utility player. I get that sometimes it's better to get a player who is easy to project and is a safe option, but at least pick someone who has more potential then a backup infielder.
Maybe you should do a bit more reading before you come to obtuse conclusions. Warmoth is much better than you give him credit for.
I can understand why people may like him better if he was sure to stick at shortstop, then at least he could be a starter. But he likely will have to move to second base. I don't see anything I said as being wrong. MLB.com's review of Warmoth says "While Warmoth doesn't have a standout tool, he also doesn't have any obvious shortcomings."
I can understand why people may like him better if he was sure to stick at shortstop, then at least he could be a starter. But he likely will have to move to second base. I don't see anything I said as being wrong. MLB.com's review of Warmoth says "While Warmoth doesn't have a standout tool, he also doesn't have any obvious shortcomings."
Having no real weaknesses instead of a standout tool doesn't mean you're a utility player. Value is value.
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2017/4/14/15144070/logan-warmoth-2017-mlb-draft-ss-north-carolina
I swear like 15 years ago I was reading basically the exact same scouting report on another North Carolina SS we took in the first round.
MLB.com's reports are months old. Warmoth has a legitimately impressive swing and above-average power that produces hard contact to all fields. Furthermore, his plus arm plays at 3B even if he doesn't stick at SS, even though he really hasn't shown anything which suggests that he can't play SS at least at an average level.
I find that if a player doesn't have a standout tool, most of the time they simply aren't good enough to be in a starter in an MLB team. If I thought he would be a starting SS or starting 2B I wouldn't care he didn't have a standout tool, but the Jays have been burned so many times by the safe, "they do everything good" option like Deck McGuire, Jon Harris and like the poster above me said, Russ Adams.
I find that if a player doesn't have a standout tool, most of the time they simply aren't good enough to be in a starter in an MLB team.
If I thought he would be a starting SS or starting 2B I wouldn't care he didn't have a standout tool, but the Jays have been burned so many times by the safe, "they do everything good" option like Deck McGuire, Jon Harris and like the poster above me said, Russ Adams.
To be fair, around here, we all kind of universally disapproved of the Trea Turner rumours because he was essentially a 'does everything well, with his only plus tool being his speed' guy. Of course, Turner has turned into somewhat of a beast (despite his slow start to 2017).
Its really a crapshoot.
There are tons of major league regulars who are just good all-around players rather than being really good at one particular aspect of the game.
And how many times have they been burned by guys with clear standout tools but obvious weaknesses? Hell, look at the 2012 draft alone.
On that note, guess that means its been 15 years since the Moneyball draft. Which remains my favourite chapter in that book because it only proves that there's no actual strategy that works when it comes to drafting MLB players besides just having more picks than anyone else.
It's tough to complain about the 2012 draft when the Jays got Stroman and Alford, and I'll take prospects like Smoral and Gonzales in the 2'nd and 3'rd round any draft. I do agree taking prospects like Davis in the first round is a bad idea, but that's because I don't like taking raw prospects who's best tool is speed.
That chapter is awesome. My favourite part is how they ridicule other teams' scouts for drafting guys who look like athletes over guys who actually put up numbers...and then they go on dismiss Prince Fielder because he's fat.
I'm also guessing that Judge goes quite a bit higher in the draft if Moneyball doesn't come out.