- Feb 10, 2010
- 14,749
- 11,949
And the unfair part of the comparison is that a critical point (just judging on this thread alone) in the argument for Ovi is his longevity of scoring at a high/elite level and of course Lemieux can't compare because his career was cut short due to injuries.
So on one hand we know Ovi was an elite scorer for a very long time but can only assume Lemieux would have (or wouldn't), so there's really no fair comparison there.
Indeed it all boils down to whether you value things that happened in real life here on planet Earth (which some say is unfair) or if you want to credit Mario Lemieux with player attributes that he clearly did not have (which some say is totally legit).