Agree on Rosen and I'm kind of out of touch with the Canes these days but John Forslund had also been fantastic back in the dayThis might be an unpopular opinion or bias showing but I think hockey has some of the better broadcast teams compared to other sports. There are only a handful of local broadcast teams that I really can’t stand. ESPN also has some ass crews, unfortunately.
Really going to miss Sam Rosen and Joe Micheletti calling Rangers games. Sam is a legend and I can’t explain why but there’s something comforting listening to him call a game.
I want Chico back in the TV booth. Dano is a real "for the fans" choice, so I can't hate him, but for outside viewers I understand why they might not like him. That, or they like him because he sounds like Jesse Ventura.I have no complaints with Bill Spaulding, Ken Daneyko, and Bryce Salvador. I wish Bryce and Dano switched roles, but I love their takes.
Chico wasn't popular among outside fans at all lol.I want Chico back in the TV booth. Dano is a real "for the fans" choice, so I can't hate him, but for outside viewers I understand why they might not like him. That, or they like him because he sounds like Jesse Ventura.
I didn't say he was but I phrased it poorly. Point is, bring back Chico.Chico wasn't popular among outside fans at all lol.
Sometimes, depending on the opponent, I'll watch the other team's feed when they play the Rangers, just because I enjoy their PBP/commentary (Sam Rosen is a legend, but I like to switch it up sometimes).
My top 5, in no particular order:
- Ottawa (Gord Miller is awesome, love when he called games for NBC)
- San Jose (Randy Hahn has great energy. His calls during the Game 7 comeback vs Vegas are incredible)
- Washington (Joe Beninati really gets into it)
- Carolina (I like Mike Maniscalco's energy. Can do without Tripp, but Mike makes up for it)
- NY Rangers (my team, Sam Rosen is a legend, especially when he was paired with John Davidson)
It's also no contest that Colorado's team is the worst in the league. I cannot stand listening to Mark Moser whine and cry over every Avs penalty or goal allowed. He's such a homer in the worst way.
I have no complaints with Bill Spaulding, Ken Daneyko, and Bryce Salvador. I wish Bryce and Dano switched roles, but I love their takes.
Avs are the worst, it's not even a debate. I also can't stand Edmonton's guy randomly yelling things.
Washington is right at the top of the list for sure.
AS for the Devils Bill Spaulding is easier on the ears than Steve "HE SCAAAAAAARES" Cangialosi was and Daneyko sounds like he's been chewing gravel most of the time, but his knowledge of the game and the Devils is top tier.
As an Avs fan, it’s somewhat indulgent and satisfying that the Avs announcers are reviled so much. Is this so surprising when Bally’s was into regional sports coverage for so long? It’s like people aren’t aware that announcers like Harry Caray and Hawk Harrelson once existed for their fans and regional coverage. In high school/college, “know you’re audience” is a concept that makes sense. But suddenly in the NHL ecosystem, everyone wants pure journalism when it comes to regional coverage. Journalism doesn’t exist (or is scarce) in mainstream media and people are expecting pure journalism when it comes to regional coverage of NHL games? Do you not see how somewhat absurd this is given the world outside of the NHL ecosystem. Even Avs fans agree with everyone that their announcers are homers. In light of all of this, the real question is so what? And why does it matter? Maybe stop pretending like you can’t watch the other team’s coverage?
I mean, in a thread about which announcers you like around the league, it shouldn’t be surprising that guys who sulk like elementary school kids when the other team does something good are going to get a bad rating.
It just seems like amateur hour.
Plenty of announcers are able to summon some interest in the other team and give exciting plays their due, so whether it’s in line with the larger journalistic environment is irrelevant.
But I’m not going to protest or try to get them cancelled or anything. It’s a free country.
You’re just regurgitating things that have been said many times that I was addressing. And you think this is some form of rebuttal? Rinse and repeat? You’ve given me nothing of substance to respond to because you haven’t said anything that I haven’t already addressed.
I’m just reinforcing the obvious in the face of your feeble argument.
You like your homer announcers, great.
When you have no argument, you don’t have the right to describe something as a a “feeble argument”.
And, I’m not calling you stupid but your reading comprehension is certainly fair to question. If you actually read my comment, at no point did I say I prefer the Avs announcers. Misattributing poitions/ideas/thoughts is the very definition of a straw man. And you actually use the word feeble.
If you look at the part of my comment that you seem to be complaining about, you’ll see I’m not defending the Avs announcing team per se as much as I’m calling out opposing fans who feel like they’re owed something.
I've always liked their broadcastsJoe B and Locker are the best, very underrated aspect of the success the Caps have had in becoming so popular in DC
What is feeble is essentially advocating that people shouldn’t have an opinion on your broadcasting team because they have the choice not to listen to them, in a thread where people are discussing what they like and dislike about announcers.
Calling out people for having an opinion in a thread where they are being asked for opinions?
Can you be more obtuse?
If you actually enjoy the villainous role played by your amateur broadcasting crew, then you shouldn’t care what other people think of them anyway.
But I suspect it still bothers you for some reason.
Having an opinion is one thing. Having an opinion is easy and cheap. It costs nothing to have an opinion. Giving people a reason to care is a different matter. In most scenarios complaining can be euphemised as having an opinion. So why should others care about this opinion? In my initial comment that you responded to, I cited “know your audience”. If the Avs are doing that, what exactly is the point of having this opinion?