Best-on-best. Playoff game. Who would you bet your money on in a game between Sweden and Finland? Jalonen vs Hallam.

Finland vs Sweden?

  • Finland

    Votes: 25 43.9%
  • Sweden

    Votes: 32 56.1%

  • Total voters
    57
They play one goalie at a time. So Ullmark and Saros. Both are great.
Sedush D is one of the most reliable D in the world, but finland got a powerhouse up front.

It will be a great game. Not to impressed by pettersson lately. Zibanejad best forward equvivalent to Rantanen is playingstyle. Forsberg cab score somem Finland has the bwst player on ice with Barkov. Sweden got Ekholm, H Lindholm, Dahlin, E Karlsson, Hedman, A Larsson as defencemen wich is a good D core. A very close game. If Filip Forsberg and ZibNejad just capitalize on their chanses, sweden wins. If not, Finland wins.
Think Lehner/Marky has the highest level among Swedish goalies!

You forgot the best Swedish Fw this season Willy Nylander, has a career season so far, and and always coming in big in the national team. Ep 40 has a great season in a bottom feeder, great 200 fw C game.

Zibby vad been great, but his produktion coming in bunches and PP coloured.

F,Forsberg has a quiet season, but he can explode in point when you think hes almost done.

Dont think Finlands Fw is better then the Swedish if you look at it today.

Swedes D with Dahlin/Hedman än d new born Ek is superior the finns.

In 1 game you never now, Finns always sees the Swedes as a Gold medal game, even in round robin.

60-40 Sweden!
 
Last edited:
Sweden has the edge, but FIN has currently their starpower in right places for success. Superstrong down the middle with Barkov, Hintz, Aho. Saros is a legit no1 goalie and fantastic no1 PP d-man in Heiskanen. If Laine & Rantanen light it up and supporting cast of Granlund, Teräväinen, Lehkonen etc. work their asses off anything can happen. D-core sucks though and for that it is Swe. Waiting for Kiviharju to age beautifully😉
 
Why do people keep saying that Sweden has better d than Finland? We dont. We have better offensive skilled Ds, yes. But the finns Ds are much better overall and much better at defending, which being a D is first and firemost about. No idea why people think being a D is only about offensive game.

Heiskanen - Lindell
Välimäki - Jokiharju
Määttä - Hakanpää

Thats a good D-corp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lambo
Why do people keep saying that Sweden has better d than Finland? We dont. We have better offensive skilled Ds, yes. But the finns Ds are much better overall and much better at defending, which being a D is first and firemost about. No idea why people think being a D is only about offensive game.

Heiskanen - Lindell
Välimäki - Jokiharju
Määttä - Hakanpää

Thats a good D-corp.
I'd replace Välimäki with Niko Mikkola since we are talking about fitting into Jukka Jalonen's system. Mikkola has won two golds with Jalonen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eye of Ra
Why do people keep saying that Sweden has better d than Finland? We dont. We have better offensive skilled Ds, yes. But the finns Ds are much better overall and much better at defending, which being a D is first and firemost about. No idea why people think being a D is only about offensive game.

Myself and others have refuted this claim you’re repeating time and time again, but you simply do not listen.
 
I have listen. But the arguments is not something i agree with. You guys should listen to what im saying.

All you’re saying is that the Finns are good at defending and the Swedes aren’t.

Meanwhile, there are 11 Swedish NHL defensemen receiving more ice time than any Finnish defenseman other than Heiskanen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy
All i know is that Sweden and Finland can win any team any time. Finland has taken medal from every best vs best Olympic tournament except from Salt Lake City, with much lesser teams what we have right now.

Sweden isn't as strong what they used to be, but it's still very good team. Rosters on paper pretty much loses it's meaning when Finland and Sweden are playing, we've seen that over the years. It's 50-50 pretty much.

If i had to bet, i'd put OT win for Finland.
 
Finland winning against Sweden in a playoff game is actually a rather rare occurrence nowadays(at senior level). Finland won 2019 WCH quarterfinal which was rather impressive. That was not best-of-best though. The last of best-of-best win was in Nagano 1998 quarterfinal. After that the swedes have beaten us every time. If there was a best-of-best tournament and we meet there, I would bet my money on Sweden although I of course hope for Finland victory.

In World Juniors its pretty even. Some great wins for us in a past couple of years but also a big disappointment lately. And that latest matchup (and the way it was done) sadly reminds me of old times. Hopefully that was just a flaw. :D
That is pretty much true for the Olympics. Finland has only managed to beat Sweden in Sapporo, Nagano and Beijing, so three times. Even then, I don't think Sweden is the favorite in 2026.
 
How often do they update those rankings? I mean, how can Russia be ranked #3 when they haven't played a competitive game for almost a year?
 
That is pretty much true for the Olympics. Finland has only managed to beat Sweden in Sapporo, Nagano and Beijing, so three times. Even then, I don't think Sweden is the favorite in 2026.
You also have to remember that current Sweden is maybe 1/4 the team what Sweden used to have with Foppa, Näslund, Sedins, Lidström etc.
 
You also have to remember that current Sweden is maybe 1/4 the team what Sweden used to have with Foppa, Näslund, Sedins, Lidström etc.

1/4, really? Sounds like crazy hyperbole, and chronologically confused seeing as those old names rarely assembled during their respective peaks. Which iteration of the Swedish national team are we even talking about here? Did we ever see all these players both in their primes and on the same roster? Näslund wasn’t there in 2006, the Sedins hadn’t hit their stride as elite players and Forsberg was gimp when that generation finally won something, after a decade of disappointments. I feel like the best possible Team Sweden with its golden generation should have been a hypothetical one somewhere between 1996-2004, but they always had flaws such as positional depth and goaltending, or — crucially — actually getting everything together and not choking.

That current projections of Team Sweden is a quarter the best team with those names is a terrible exaggeration. Today’s Team Sweden may lack the immense star power of Forsberg, Sundin, peak Alfredsson, peak Näslund, but it does look deeper than most Swedish forward groups historically. I’m not taking anyone above Sundin, but I’d take all of Zibanejad, Pettersson, Lindholm, and probably William Karlsson as well over Michael Nylander for #2C. Lidström was rarely the hero for Team Sweden that his NHL reputation would suggest, but even if he was Bobby Orr incarnate, Sweden’s D-corps is looking better with its 3-4 Norris level players of recent history than it ever did with Lidström et al. The golden generation also got by with below average goaltending, at least at the world stage, until young Lundqvist finally arrived for their last hurrah. Hard to argue that whatever flavor of the season all-star projected to start for Team Sweden trumps Lundqvist, but at least Sweden’s had great other options for a few years now whereas the golden generation usually had Tommy Salo, who at best was a very average NHL goalie, and not much else.

All’s to say, there have been stronger iterations of Team Sweden than the best possible of today, but Sweden’s definitely not at 1/4 of its historical best. Absolute peak offensive stars have dropped, but other positions are deeper and stronger.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad