Before tonight, Buffalo and Vancouver had the same goal differential. 1 his dead last in his conference while the other has a WC spot.

HabsCode

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
4,070
4,883
Kind of a random thread I will conceide, but how do you explain this. Before tonights game they were both at -12.

Do Sabres lose all their game in a terribly close manner? Or vice and versa do Vancouver wins a lot of really close games?

They have similar PK efficiency (only 2.2% difference) but Vancouver has a considerably better PP at 22.5 vs 16.2.

Buffalo has 5 players with 40 or more points. Vancouver has one and it's a defenseman.

Vancouver has goaltending of .904 (Lankinen) from their more frequent start, .889 from Demko. Buffalo most frequent starter Lukkonen is at .897 and second is Reimer at 0.908.

Is the east bottom half teams just stronger than the west bottom half teams?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysses31
Kind of a random thread I will conceide, but how do you explain this. Before tonights game they were both at -12.

Do Sabres lose all their game in a terribly close manner? Or vice and versa do Vancouver wins a lot of really close games?

They have similar PK efficiency (only 2.2% difference) but Vancouver has a considerably better PP at 22.5 vs 16.2.

Buffalo has 5 players with 40 or more points. Vancouver has one and it's a defenseman.

Vancouver has goaltending of .904 (Lankinen) from their more frequent start, .889 from Demko. Buffalo most frequent starter Lukkonen is at .897 and second is Reimer at 0.908.

Is the east bottom half teams just stronger than the west bottom half teams?
Yes the Eastern bottom feeders are much better. The oddest goal differential is the Lightning.
 
Canucks and Wings have the same GD now (-11) and are in the same spot in the standings..

What a weird thread
It would be better, when comparing goal differential to acknowledge engs against, as wildcard teams tend to pull the goalie more often for points, understandably.
 
Kind of what you'd expect from a team with significant injury problems. Good enough to win when healthy, but getting blown out when a bunch of key guys are on the shelf. I'm not sure if that's actually what happened, but why let facts get in the way of a fun hypothesis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
The Canucks have lost a lot of one goal games.

They've lost so many OT games (they're 3-11 as of this post) that it's a statistical outlier. That, coupled with locker room drama and whack-a-mole injuries to their core, and it kind of feels like this season is cursed.

Fortunately there's no 3-on-3 in the playoffs, so if the Canucks manage to squeeze into a wildcard spot with everyone relatively healthy they could be a dangerous floater in the postseason.

I wouldn't bet on it tho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot
They got plenty of face palms, though
Instead of palm trees Buffalo has palm threes:

1739088053570.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MaWa
Vancouver plays a very defensive style and grinds out a lot of one-goal wins. Buffalo at times blows out opponents, but also lose tons of one-goal games. Dahlin (their best player) was also out injured for I think half of that long losing streak. They're not a particularly deep or well-balanced team, but they're also not necessarily worst-in-the-conference bad.
 
Kind of a random thread I will conceide, but how do you explain this. Before tonights game they were both at -12.

Do Sabres lose all their game in a terribly close manner? Or vice and versa do Vancouver wins a lot of really close games?

They have similar PK efficiency (only 2.2% difference) but Vancouver has a considerably better PP at 22.5 vs 16.2.

Buffalo has 5 players with 40 or more points. Vancouver has one and it's a defenseman.

Vancouver has goaltending of .904 (Lankinen) from their more frequent start, .889 from Demko. Buffalo most frequent starter Lukkonen is at .897 and second is Reimer at 0.908.

Is the east bottom half teams just stronger than the west bottom half teams?
Easily. Points aren’t based on goal differential and every game is different. There are many ways to get to the same number.

Goal differential is about a relevant to position in the standings as the roster limit of players allowed to dress per game, which they are also tied in!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad