gritdash60
Registered User
Im going to say 47 and i think thats a very good season for him, Blackhawks are going to be very bad next season.
Nore likely he puts up closer to 50 goals then 47 ptsIm going to say 47 and i think thats a very good season for him, Blackhawks are going to be very bad next season.
Bruh you are dreaming big, i like it. Keep that mindset in your life!80-110
80 pts if hes a Matthews esque play
100ish pts if hes a crosby esque player
110&up if hes Mcdavid esque player
He'll be closer to 50 goals then 40 pts
47 pts would mean he has a rookie year as good as Lafrenriere adjusting for scoring and his usageBruh you are dreaming big, i like it. Keep that mindset in your life!
Jack Hughes scored 21 points in his rookie year (he missed 21 games).47 pts would mean he has a rookie year as good as Lafrenriere adjusting for scoring and his usage
He will have Taylor Hall (50-60 pt player the last few years in a 3rd line scoring role) and possibly Reichel (50-60 pt rookie season should be expected with his first two years being similar to Nylander in the AHL/short NHL stint)
I can't see him getting 47 pts unless he misses ~30 games
Hughes was a worse prospect than Bedard and his rookie year was clearly an issue with him being small, he added muscle the next year and was a 50ish pt player before exploding the past two yearsJack Hughes scored 21 points in his rookie year (he missed 21 games).
Reichel and Hall if healthy I see as 60 pt players without Bedard boost.I think he could have the ability to be a top 10 scorer but likely 'just' a top ~25 scorer due to the severe lack of talent on the Hawks
McD and Sid at least had some talent on their teams as rookies
There is no chance Bedard gets 70+ in his rookie season in that team. It just will not happen. If he does im very happy to be proven wrong but i give it like 1% chance of happening.Hughes was a worse prospect than Bedard and his rookie year was clearly an issue with him being small, he added muscle the next year and was a 50ish pt player before exploding the past two years
Bedard is around 185 lbs so he doesnt have the same issue with size adjustment.
Hall, RNH, Yakupov, Matthews, Hishier were all 50 pts or better pace wise as rookies
Bedard is considered a generational or borderline generational prospect (patty kane/Matthews).
Kane had 72 pts and Matthews 69. With scoring up I cant see less than 80 ots from Bedard. He is just to skilled and hard to touch
Came here to say something like this.80-110
80 pts if hes a Matthews esque play
100ish pts if hes a crosby esque player
110&up if hes Mcdavid esque player
Nore likely he puts up closer to 50 goals then 47 pts
Guys like Hischier, RNH, Hall, Laf, Yakupov, Tavares, and Stamkos put up higher then that or higher pace (well except for Laf)
NHL scoring is higher than when those guys mostly came in 2008-2017 stage
He is also a couple tiers ahead as a prospect than the best of that group
Bedard is going to be the exception to your size rule.It'll be about 55. He'll be given every chance to succeed, but it won't be as easy as some think. He'll have a good season though and be in the Calder race.
If he’s a generational type player we’ll know it after the first few games but i don’t think Chicago fans needs to be concerned if he score around 50 points.If bedard gets 47 points with a full season, there will be a lot of concerned people in Chicago…..hes A lock to be a ppg player imho.