Bedard or Celebrini
- Thread starter Pete Taylor
- Start date
PeteEakins
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2021
- 398
- 1,275
We only get to see three NHL games from Celebrini and now we have to decide. GO!!
i was looking for this very topic after watching the game last night. I firmly believe Bedard is going to be an elite producer but very very very tiny sample size Celebrini looked better to me. Zero surprise if/when Bedard is better but so far in limited view just against my team and if I knew nothing of either i'd pick Celebrini.
Peasy
Registered User
I'm gunna find it funny if Celebrini actually ends up better in the end. My god the Bedard hype for those entire 2 years leading up to him being drafted. They barely made a fuss about Celebrini probably because they were so tired of pumpin Bedard for 2 years straight.
Could easily see Bedard ending up the better offensive weapon but when all is said and done, Celebrini has the more successful career overall.
Could easily see Bedard ending up the better offensive weapon but when all is said and done, Celebrini has the more successful career overall.
Very hard question to answer really. I've seen a fair amount of Chicago games and Bedard looks like the real deal, but has some question marks too (size and speed)....but I think he'll be good. I rarely see San Jose games....1) timing and 2) just never been a team I'm interested in watching.....that said, even if I watched their games, I would have only seen Celebrini play 3 games....so would really have nothing to go on....fairly anyway.
hotcabbagesoup
"I'm going to get what I deserve" -RutgerMcgroarty
North Vancouver what are you feeding your kids?!!!!!
yeah that's what i'm thinking. Might end up a kopitar situation where it takes him his whole career before people acknowledge how underappreciated he had been (relative other elite players).
Celebrini for me. Bedard is a winger disguised as a C. Celebrini looks like Toews with more offense
Mathew Barzal
Walk It Like I Tocchet
A diet of very wealthy parents and opportunity + access to facilities/training that no average human can afford.
I appreciate responses like this. Celebrini is amazing. 18 year old Patrick Marleau is the second best rookie I’ve been able to watch up close and Celebrini is miles better. He has an amazing shot combined with great vision and creativity. Add a high motor and active stick in all 3 zones. Plus we are hearing that his work ethic at practice and off the ice is unparalleled. We have a winner.
Shark Finn
∀dministrator
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,027
- 17,153
Ghost of Murph
Registered User
- Dec 23, 2023
- 1,151
- 1,874
- Jan 23, 2017
- 20,134
- 28,231
Used to be Bedard for me, now it's Celebrini. If Bedard scores the next game while Celebrini doesn't, then it's Bedard again.
HairyKneel
Registered User
- Jun 5, 2023
- 1,458
- 1,347
McKenna will be better than both. But make me pick I go with Macklin. But you can't go wrong with Bedard either. Both really nice kids. Apparently Macklin's youngest brother is going to be a stud. Seven more years and he can come back home. Bedard in six. Right about the time Miller and Peter's contracts expire.
